Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I remember months ago, there was a rumor that the 12 would support 8-bit color and the 12 Pro would support 10-bit color. Is this still accurate? I haven’t seen any of the tech spec comparisons mention this.
I was almost sure it was in the announcement. I need to find that live blog summary.

EDIT: Guess not. Just mentions that Pro can record 10-bit HDR
 
I was very much leaning towards the regular 12 but with the $120 price difference between the 128GB version and the 128 Pro, I'm leaning towards the Pro now. T-Mobile is going to give me $415 for my XR which brings the monthly cost down to $24 for the Pro, $5 more per month than the regular 12. I think the $5 per month extra is worth it for a phone I will be holding onto for 2-3 years
 
So, the main camera’s sensor is identical between the two? And the only benefit on the Max is with the Telephoto/zoom lens?

Or am I getting confused with what a sensor and lens is, and just sound stupid? Ha. As in the sensor is what controls all 3 lenses, and if larger, allows more light for all of them - and will improve all 3 lenses over the 12 Pro?
So the way I understand it is each lens has its own sensor. Put very simply, a camera sensor is what takes the light that passes through the lens and turns it into an image the phone can use. The short answer to your question is "no". Just because one of the sensors is larger doesn't mean it improves all three lenses.

The wide lens (I assume this is the main one you're talking about) has a sensor that is larger on the Pro Max than it is on the Pro, and features sensor shift image stabilization, which should help in low-light situations. Again, this ONLY helps the performance of the WIDE camera. The main sensor on the 12 and the 12 Pro I believe is the same, but the 12 Pro has dual optical image stabilization (OIS, where the lens moves to keep the shot steady), while the 12 has single OIS. There are a lot of nuances between the camera systems in the models, and to be honest, I don't think we'll truly know the difference in performance between them until third parties do real testing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: friedmud
Okay, so how much more light does the wide lens get on the Pro Max vs the Pro? Bigger pixels too, correct? Realistically speaking just how much better is the main camera going to be on the Pro Max vs Pro.

EDIT: Thanks for the response, Fuji. I’ve currently got the 11 Pro. I can’t imagine going back to that huge size of a Max (as when I did on an 8 Plus). But if it’s going to be a significant upgrade on the Max’s main lens, it’s something I have to consider. I take a lot of photos, the camera is the only reason I upgrade year to year.
 
The iPhone 12 starts at $799 ($829 for some carriers)

WRONG! The iPhone 12 starts at $829 (SIM-free, T-Mobile, Sprint) and $799 with a $30 discount for some (two) carriers.

You've bought into Apple's deception--trying to make the $130 price hike seem less.
 
I'm well aware, I'm pointing out the differences/changes to the person claiming nothing had changed.
[automerge]1602784159[/automerge]

47% larger than what? The 12 Pro? The 12? The 11 Pro?
'

Yes. 47% larger than the 12 Pro, 12, and 11 Pro. This has a pretty good breakdown: https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/14/21515158/iphone-12-pro-max-best-camera-biggest-phone

So, the main camera’s sensor is identical between the two? And the only benefit on the Max is with the Telephoto/zoom lens?

Or am I getting confused with what a sensor and lens is, and just sound stupid? Ha. As in the sensor is what controls all 3 lenses, and if larger, allows more light for all of them - and will improve all 3 lenses over the 12 Pro?
So the way I understand it is each lens has its own sensor. The wide lens (I assume this is the main one you're talking about) has a sensor that is larger on the Pro Max than it is on the Pro, and features sensor shift image stabilization, which should help in low-light situations. The main sensor on the 12 and the 12 Pro I believe is the same, but the 12 Pro has dual optical image stabilization (OIS, where the lens moves to keep the shot steady), while the 12 has single OIS. There are a lot of nuances between the camera systems in the models, and to be honest, I don't think we'll truly know the difference in performance between them until third parties do real testing.

Fuji has this right: 3 sensors, one for each lens: Ultra Wide, Wide and Tele.

12 Pro Max has a 47% larger sensor for the Wide lens.

12 Pro (regular and max) both have sensor-shift stabilization for the Wide and Tele sensors. This allows the sensor to move to counter camera movemnt (vibration, etc.). This is called a "dual-optical" stabilization because there is stabilization in both the lenses _and_ and sensors.

It definitely will for the reasons you said. Apple always puts something unique on the new models for the vain customers. Plus they featured the color on GMA. Hopefully they forget by the time Pro can be ordered or it will be backordered to 2021 if you don't order in 30 seconds.

"vain"? Why be nasty? Some people will utilize those "unique" features. I will definitely use every bit of camera in the Pro Max... including ProRAW when it's released. If the phone isn't for you, then just move on and let the rest of us talk about why we're buying them.
 
12 Pro (regular and max) both have sensor-shift stabilization for the Wide and Tele sensors. This allows the sensor to move to counter camera movemnt (vibration, etc.). This is called a "dual-optical" stabilization because there is stabilization in both the lenses _and_ and sensors.
Wait, is this true? I read the information to mean that only the wide camera sensor on the Pro Max featured sensor stabilization, but I would happy if I'm wrong about this :)
 
'



12 Pro Max has a 47% larger sensor for the Wide lens.

I guess this is just what it comes down to for me, just how much better that larger sensor is going to translate in photographs. I’d prefer to remain with the sizing of a Pro, mainly due to pocketability. But if it is that significant, it kind of forces my hand to go with the Max.
 
Wait, is this true? I read the information to mean that only the wide camera sensor on the Pro Max featured sensor stabilization, but I would happy if I'm wrong about this :)

From: https://www.apple.com/iphone-12-pro/specs/

"Dual optical image stabilization (Wide and Telephoto)"
[automerge]1602787303[/automerge]
@FujiLingo it wouldn't make sense to put it on the wide and leave it off the tele... the Tele is where it's really needed most! ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: FujiLingo
Sigh. Still wrong.
Uhhh actually drzen is right... The Pro Max tele is worse in low-light than the Pro is because of (1) max aperture difference between f/2.0 and f/2.2 and (2) focal length difference between 65mm and 52mm. The shorter the focal length, the slower the shutter speed you can get away with to still get a crisp photo without camera shake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmariboe
Does anybody know how exactly LIDAR improves low light photos? Previously we had raw camera specs that bettered low light photography on these phones year to year, now we have LIDAR. Can anyone explain?
 
From: https://www.apple.com/iphone-12-pro/specs/

"Dual optical image stabilization (Wide and Telephoto)"
[automerge]1602787303[/automerge]
@FujiLingo it wouldn't make sense to put it on the wide and leave it off the tele... the Tele is where it's really needed most! ;-)
Wow. This makes the decision go more in favor of the Pro over the Pro Max for me. I was pretty much sold on the Pro Max, but if the only true benefit to the Max is just the larger sensor and slightly different telephoto, I might have to reconsider.
 
When reading this Apple makes it seem like the sensor stabilization is exclusive to the Max.
 

Attachments

  • 33B4CE71-A765-4E93-88C4-4E74E6A76595.jpeg
    33B4CE71-A765-4E93-88C4-4E74E6A76595.jpeg
    198.5 KB · Views: 118
  • 72765BE5-BF36-45E7-AA34-93F257F88361.jpeg
    72765BE5-BF36-45E7-AA34-93F257F88361.jpeg
    104.1 KB · Views: 110
When reading this Apple makes it seem like the sensor stabilization is exclusive to the Max.
Ahhh way to make me come crashing back down to reality! Looks like I'm going with the Max again...

Also, that screenshot doesn't make it clear whether sensor stabilization will be on the telephoto. I hope that it is.
 
Last edited:
Uhhh actually drzen is right... The Pro Max tele is worse in low-light than the Pro is because of (1) max aperture difference between f/2.0 and f/2.2 and (2) focal length difference between 65mm and 52mm. The shorter the focal length, the slower the shutter speed you can get away with to still get a crisp photo without camera shake.
They claim the Telephoto is identical from the 11 to 12 Pro. It's not.
 
Gonna go slightly OT here:

Any idea how much of a discount we can expect on the 11 Pro once the 12 is out? (I realize they won’t be available @ the Apple Store.)

Given the shrinking price differentials between models, it’s actually getting pretty hard to choose. For 256GB, the Mini is $879, 12 Pro $1099... If the 11 Pro shows up at sub-$800 prices it would be pretty compelling. (I’m coming from a 6S, so any of these phones will be paradise to me.)

Seems like it was easier NOT to buy a Pro last year, but with the difference being only $100-$200ish from the standard 12/Mini, the tele lens and LiDAR are a lot more tempting.
[automerge]1602790630[/automerge]
I believe the iPhone 11 Pro has a 52mm f/2.0 telephoto lens. That's exactly the same one that's on the iPhone 12 Pro. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I think the difference is the Tele and Ultra Wide can do Night Mode now...?
 
Currently have iPhone 11 128Gb on IUP in UK, deciding what to do. Will definitely be a 12 or 12 Pro at 128Gb

So 12 (price increase from last year), goes to £46.45, 12 Pro £56.45.

Without seeing the colours in the flesh I prefer the blue of the 12 I think, and I think I want blue this year.

Next year I’ll probably do IUP again unless decide nothing new. I am this year as want OLED.

Just not sure on what to do. Not really impressed with the wide camera as goes fisheye to me so don’t use much. I’m not a professional at all, but do take lots of pics and vids all with my iPhone.

I’d much rather have a zoom, although can’t remember if a x2 is any different in real use?
 
The Pro Max has a larger sensor and OIS on the sensor itself instead of the lens.

But that's only on the ultra-wide camera.

Frankly, and assuming sensor-OIS is substantially better than lens-OIS, I'd rather have that on the wide and telephoto sensors, as camera shake is more detrimental at longer focal lengths.

EDIT: I made a mistake. sensor-OIS is on the wide sensor, not the ultra-wide sensor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
Two days ago I pretty much had my mind made up for the Pro Max, mostly for the larger display and battery. Yesterday, thinking about its size and usability, and coming from an iPhone X, I decided to create a mockup out of wood, and carry it around for a few hours as if it was a real phone. An experiment.

Based on that, I decided to get the regular 12 Pro. For me, the Pro Max was a little too unwieldy. And the 12 Pro being about the same size as my X, will work just fine.



iPhone X and 12 Pro Max.jpg
 
How am I supposed to pick between aerospace-grade aluminum and surgical-grade steel!?

Was Apple this full of bs when Steve Jobs was there and his reality distortion field just worked better? This sounds like the kind of nonsense I expect from a jeweler, not Apple.
It’s a good point. I found that at first glance, one fixates on the first words ‘aerospace-grade and ‘surgical-grade’... and would assume that ‘aerospace-grade’ would trounce anything else... and then you re-read it... 🙄
 
13h to go and still cannot decide if I should go rather with 12 or 12 max.

It might sounds silly but the design of the 12 is waaaaay better than 12 pro. I can't stand this pacific blue color (I want blue) and these three lenses 🙃🙃🙃

Currently I have 11 pro max.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lwii2boo
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.