the sensor only makes sense if the computational capabilities are in line. iphone camera dont use alot of AI to improve and reduce the noise and as a result ip12pro pics r so meh. and the camera isnt even in the top20.
I find no flaws in your logic. I'm sure most people wouldn't complain about their phone not being 'super thin' if it meant better battery life.
Besides an obsession with thin/light, I think it has to do with the internal layout. It's not arbitrary to simply increase the depth for more battery without having empty spaces that compromise stability. The iPhone X was the first time Apple employed an 'L-shaped' battery (basically two rectangles), so I doubt they're capable of getting batteries that can fill more weirdly-shaped free space. They would essentially have to redesign the whole layout to achieve a depth with no camera bump, which would mean a redesign of the manufacturing process (costly pain).
It's not Apple's fault. No one forced all of these case-making companies to flood the market with their (mostly-crap) smelly plastic products thinking consumers were going to run out and buy them all. They assumed that Apple won't change the design from one year to the next...and you know what happens when you assume?
They do it that way as an upsell just like with the "pro" ipad. There isn't really anything "pro" about the device, but it adds to apple's profit margin.
Man the bootlicking is real with you. So instead of blaming apple (who will do something like make it .2 mm thicker so cases (even the own apple cases) won't fit, and you blame it on the case manufacturers l o l. I could see if they were changing the designs drastically year to year, but come on, Apple comes out and says they are leaving out the charging brick because of the environment, yet single-handedly is responsible for all the waste when they reuse the design (which I am fine with btw) but change just enough that the previous-gen cases won't fit. No different than when they went from the X-Xs and made the camera module a little larger so X cases didn't fit.
Ordinarily what you say makes total sense , unless it’s about the max phones which are already too heavy and a pain to hold for a prolonged period.
Technically still symmetrical, the axis is just tilted diagonally to the leftI don't think Apple will do something like this! If you look at the Pro cameras the top one is smaller than the other two! If one thing Apple showed us is that they like symmetry
I would gladly pay the same price for a smaller phone that has all the features. I, for one, don't want a huge phablet that I'm juggling all day.
13 mini is my jam this year after September as well.
only if they bring the MBP 14” and 16” correct this time, no more keyboard issues, no more gutting performance on the small low end models to make the top end models seem decent. No chumping on ports for the low end vs the top end.
We here :: love my 12 mini.
LOL … So you want another lipstick phone? Didn’t work for Nokia too well but I think Mila jovavich may have one to sell you.I'll take a cylinder form factor. Now we're talking...
