Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
. . . the days of the independent, small repair shops are over. . .
Maybe, maybe not. Tens or hundreds of millions of devices out there, some easier than others to repair.

I just had battery replacement done on a 5th generation iPad, used local non-authorized repair shop, they did the work quickly and I know of no problems.

I would be less eager to give my new $1100 13 Pro Max to a local shop, however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjack50
No, Apple did this so you can't spoof FaceID.

Apple doesn't give a **** about third-party repair services, they care about ensuring the security of their devices.
Agreed. Logic and Reason escape the dexterous digits of the nattering nabobs who react with ever-jerking knees to anything that seems rainbows-and-unicorns pleasantry. Reality is a harsh and hateful mistress for many here today, it seeems.
 
I can see both sides of the argument.

The days of people getting cheap screen replacements from independent shops for around £20-£50 are over on new devices. They'll need to now spend up to 10 times the amount to get an out of warranty repair done:


The pricing is outrageous. £316.44 for the iPhone 11/12/13 Pro Max for example. £266.44 on the mainstream iPhone 11/12/13. It will just push people to Android devices where they can get cheap and easy repairs done.

Then on the other hand, there's the security aspect.

But lets be honest, Apple can push the security agenda all they like. They just want to get the extra revenue that third parties currently receive.

It does make an absolute mockery of Apple's environmental message. Perfectly good devices will end up in the bin because people simply wont be able to afford to get them repaired.

What will Apple do next? Ensure the batteries cannot be replaced by third parties? I'm sure they already have plans for this.
 
I've always found a $20 case and $8 screen protector works wonders. I dropped my phone face-first hard on the concrete about two weeks ago, and broke my screen protector, put about 4 big cracks in it. Put a new one on, it was too off center, but put on a second and it was all good. Yesterday I dropped my phone right at a funny angle on the floor by the bathroom (again face-first) and chipped and cracked the screen protector, again. Thankfully they came as a three-pack! :)
 
In an era where everyone has their personal information on mobile phones including but not limited to…

Credit cards
Driver license
Car/home keys
Vaccination info
Private messages
Location history
Political affiliation
Web history

Apple has to create as many security measures as possible.

Hackers only need to break in once to humiliate Apple. Remember the icloud scandal
That's great info until you realize 100% of the FaceID components are mated to the body of the device and have 0 parts inside the display. Literally 0 are in the display.

the display only has clear cutouts so the sensors can see through the display.
when you change the display nothing to do with the FaceID hardware comes out.

The device detects a different SN from the display and then just disables the faceID even though the display has nothing to do with FaceID. The display does not contain the sensors and does not do any faceID processing.

So none of the security concerns exist like it did with TouchID which WAS installed into the display but could be moved to a different display to keep security.

This is why its anti repair for them to disable touchID.

The chip they are moving from one display to the next to keep FaceID is just the Identifier with no FaceID processing at all. Thats done on board the device.

Again for the record when you change a display you dont remove or even touch any FaceID components.
 
What’s the problem here? Take better care of your stuff and you won’t need repairs. But if something does happen, who is trusting their $1K phone to an unauthorized repair shop anyway?
The local third party shops are the go-to for the majority of users, especially for battery & screen replacements. Shops in train stations/airports/service stations/shopping malls make a good living repairing devices. Its just convenient for people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diesel79
This will be an unpopular opinion, but I'm 100% fine with this if it means I can trust the shop repairing my Apple product to do it properly, and with OEM Apple components. Kinda comes down to "if you don't like the policy, don't buy the product in the first place". Let your wallet speak.

Related, I recently had a non-AASC tell me they sold/use Apple OEM parts, and then the display fell off my iMac because they were using the wrong parts.

Same here. I'm fine having Apple repair my phone, though I've never needed a repair since buying iPhones for a dozen+ years.

Have to laugh at all the intense outrage here! Wonder how many people will be voting with their wallets next time they need a phone. Likely none.
 
"This situation makes AppleCare all but required for newer iPhones, unless you happen to know that your local repair shop is ready for the challenge. Or you simply plan to never drop your phone."

I've never purchased AppleCare, never needed it. This doesn't change that.
 
Not surprised at all. Apple only looks out for Apple. Specifically, their own full pockets.
They have to make up for their losses, iPhone marketshare recently dropped to under 14% and they dropped to rank #4 of smartphone manufacturers. The money's gotta come from somewhere, so make sure others can't repair and raise repair prices. They can't live from the US market alone.
 
The device detects a different SN from the display and then just disables the faceID even though the display has nothing to do with FaceID. The display does not contain the sensors and does not do any faceID processing.

So none of the security concerns exist like it did with TouchID which WAS installed into the display but could be moved to a different display to keep security.

This is why its anti repair for them to disable touchID.

The chip they are moving from one display to the next to keep FaceID is just the Identifier with no FaceID processing at all. Thats done on board the device.

Again for the record when you change a display you dont remove or even touch any FaceID components.
I saw a YouTube video where the guy was swapping parts between two identical iPhones. Nothing really worked until he put the original parts together that came with each phone. Apple looks to be using serial numbers on the major parts and marrying the parts for a given phone together. Changing parts requires apple tools to update the serial number inventory for a given phone. Everyone is, of course, calling this a lock in to Apple for repairs.

What it is really doing is making the value of stolen parts much lower if you can't use them. Stolen phones for parts is a big business and part of why independent repair shops can undercut Apple so much.
 
An unsurprisingly consumer-hostile move from Apple. I’m sure it’s only a coincidence that they charge an arm and a leg for screens replacements.
And what a coincidence that Apple users symbolically already put THEIR credit card inside APPLE's Wallet, the App.
Vicious circle completed, and thumbscrews tightened, ready steady suck!
 
The screen repair on my iPhone 6S Plus broke my Touch ID. Don’t know if it’s an edge case/user error, or a known issue, though.
same issue here with my IPhone 6s, I’ve purchased a cheap EBay screen replacement and it rendered Touch ID useless/disabled, found a reputable EBay seller with iPhone 6s Touch ID compatible LCD screen replacement and works very well, I guess you get what you paid for.
 
A couple of years ago I accidentally got my iPhone X wet, everything still worked except for faceID. The cost to replace the module was prohibitively expensive so I went without faceID for a few months until the 11 came out. It was a real drag, and I was extremely relieved when I got the feature back after buying the 11.

I hope I never have a phone without faceID again. And I fully support the right to repair. I really wish Apple designed its products so its customers could repair their devices on their own.

IMO the only acceptable reasons for making them so difficult to repair is to make them less desirable to thieves and / or making them more secure against non-owner tampering. So if that is the case, I can live with the current design choices.

I also understand that if I don't like Apple's decisions, no one is forcing me to buy their stuff.
 
Last edited:
Tech is going to be more and more complicated and integrated in order to make design more efficient. New Face ID is smaller and integrated with the screen, it's good direction in order to reduce the notch. With the pace of innovation and complexity right now some people really expect to keep repairing things with screwdriver
 
First? Security issues should be handled one at a time? Idle the hardware team until the software team fixes all their bugs?
No one said anything about idling anyone. The argument was "look we make things so secure", when in reality many security issues exists.
Please explain how repairability or replacement of a component is a threat to security in this particular case, and please explain in detail so a hardware and software designer can understand it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.