Meta of course!in all fairness though, who else would Apple look out for if not themselves? Amazon?
Meta of course!in all fairness though, who else would Apple look out for if not themselves? Amazon?
Maybe, maybe not. Tens or hundreds of millions of devices out there, some easier than others to repair.. . . the days of the independent, small repair shops are over. . .
Agreed. Logic and Reason escape the dexterous digits of the nattering nabobs who react with ever-jerking knees to anything that seems rainbows-and-unicorns pleasantry. Reality is a harsh and hateful mistress for many here today, it seeems.No, Apple did this so you can't spoof FaceID.
Apple doesn't give a **** about third-party repair services, they care about ensuring the security of their devices.
Tim Cook has made more money this year than I will probably ever make in my lifetime so forgive me if I don’t shed a tear if right to repair makes him slightly less filthy rich.Give Apple a break guys, after all, they need to earn a living. I don’t want to see Timmy in the poor house.
That's great info until you realize 100% of the FaceID components are mated to the body of the device and have 0 parts inside the display. Literally 0 are in the display.In an era where everyone has their personal information on mobile phones including but not limited to…
Credit cards
Driver license
Car/home keys
Vaccination info
Private messages
Location history
Political affiliation
Web history
Apple has to create as many security measures as possible.
Hackers only need to break in once to humiliate Apple. Remember the icloud scandal
The local third party shops are the go-to for the majority of users, especially for battery & screen replacements. Shops in train stations/airports/service stations/shopping malls make a good living repairing devices. Its just convenient for people.What’s the problem here? Take better care of your stuff and you won’t need repairs. But if something does happen, who is trusting their $1K phone to an unauthorized repair shop anyway?
This will be an unpopular opinion, but I'm 100% fine with this if it means I can trust the shop repairing my Apple product to do it properly, and with OEM Apple components. Kinda comes down to "if you don't like the policy, don't buy the product in the first place". Let your wallet speak.
Related, I recently had a non-AASC tell me they sold/use Apple OEM parts, and then the display fell off my iMac because they were using the wrong parts.
Then maybe they should start by fixing their constant security issues in software first, no?No, Apple did this so you can't spoof FaceID.
Apple doesn't give a **** about third-party repair services, they care about ensuring the security of their devices.
"This situation makes AppleCare all but required for newer iPhones, unless you happen to know that your local repair shop is ready for the challenge. Or you simply plan to never drop your phone."
First? Security issues should be handled one at a time? Idle the hardware team until the software team fixes all their bugs?Then maybe they should start by fixing their constant security issues in software first, no?
It’s almost as though Apple has built in a series of ways to lock customers in by making switching expensive and inconvenient.Wonder how many people will be voting with their wallets next time they need a phone. Likely none.
An inability to replace the iPhone 13's display without breaking Face ID could have a major impact on companies that offer iPhone repairs, iFixit [url="https://www.ifixit.com/News/54829/apples-new-screen-repair-trap-could-change-the-repair-industry-forever"]said today in an article advocating for Right to Repair laws.
When you find yourself borrowing language from Spiro Agnew, it's never a good look...Did you just find out what a thesaurus is or have you always written like a comic book villain?
They have to make up for their losses, iPhone marketshare recently dropped to under 14% and they dropped to rank #4 of smartphone manufacturers. The money's gotta come from somewhere, so make sure others can't repair and raise repair prices. They can't live from the US market alone.Not surprised at all. Apple only looks out for Apple. Specifically, their own full pockets.
I saw a YouTube video where the guy was swapping parts between two identical iPhones. Nothing really worked until he put the original parts together that came with each phone. Apple looks to be using serial numbers on the major parts and marrying the parts for a given phone together. Changing parts requires apple tools to update the serial number inventory for a given phone. Everyone is, of course, calling this a lock in to Apple for repairs.The device detects a different SN from the display and then just disables the faceID even though the display has nothing to do with FaceID. The display does not contain the sensors and does not do any faceID processing.
So none of the security concerns exist like it did with TouchID which WAS installed into the display but could be moved to a different display to keep security.
This is why its anti repair for them to disable touchID.
The chip they are moving from one display to the next to keep FaceID is just the Identifier with no FaceID processing at all. Thats done on board the device.
Again for the record when you change a display you dont remove or even touch any FaceID components.
It’s almost as though Apple has built in a series of ways to lock customers in by making switching expensive and inconvenient.
And what a coincidence that Apple users symbolically already put THEIR credit card inside APPLE's Wallet, the App.An unsurprisingly consumer-hostile move from Apple. I’m sure it’s only a coincidence that they charge an arm and a leg for screens replacements.
same issue here with my IPhone 6s, I’ve purchased a cheap EBay screen replacement and it rendered Touch ID useless/disabled, found a reputable EBay seller with iPhone 6s Touch ID compatible LCD screen replacement and works very well, I guess you get what you paid for.The screen repair on my iPhone 6S Plus broke my Touch ID. Don’t know if it’s an edge case/user error, or a known issue, though.
And what a coincidence that Apple users symbolically already put THEIR credit card inside APPLE's Wallet, the App.
Vicious circle completed, and thumbscrews tightened, ready steady suck!
No one said anything about idling anyone. The argument was "look we make things so secure", when in reality many security issues exists.First? Security issues should be handled one at a time? Idle the hardware team until the software team fixes all their bugs?