I’m sorry the regular pro is a pos. You got to step up your game and get the max or sit down and just relax. And play the sax on your bax. Keep talking and I’ll charge you taxHow does the Pro compare, is it identical besides the resolution/size?
No the part you are missing is that they tested all the phones, the best phonesAm I missing something as DisplayMate do not seem to have tested many phones other than 3 iPhones over the last 2 years
Why does the picture on the left look familiar to me?
Here's the thing, the 13 Pro Max hits the exact same brightness measurement in direct sunlight with an all white screen at roughly 1000 nits. This is the first time I've seen Apple stoop to Samsung's advertising level and claim 2000 nits as that is with a very low APL which means most of the display isn't displaying anything at all.I took my kids to an amusement park this weekend and was frequently checking game updates for my Chiefs (RIP) and my iPhone 14 Pro was so easy to read in direct sunlight. The problem? It was draining my battery like CRAZY. I had to put it into low power mode so it wouldn't get so bright.
I doubt there are many situations where I would be outside in direct sunlight for so long frequently checking my phone over the course of a three hour NFL game but still that 2300nits is amazing and absolutely nukes batteries. They can seriously stop working on display brightness I see no reason to ever improve over looking great in direct sunlight. For HDR content indoors I often find myself turning down the brightness because it's just too blinding.
Do you say Congrats TSMC for Apples processors?Congrats Samsung.
Anecdotally on these forums, people prefer the PWM of the 13 over the 14.Isn't already undisputed? what other display comes close?
The PWM is so bad with the flickering on these phones I had to downgrade back to an iPhone 11 which is the last iPhone with an LCD (correction iPhone SE has an LCD still). No more headaches, no more EYE STRAIN. I can spend hours staring at an LCD no problems.
Literally about to “downgrade” to a third-gen SE from an iPhone 13 mini with eye-stabbing OLED. These displays are so overrated it’s crazy. Like, just look at the headline/article.The PWM is so bad with the flickering on these phones I had to downgrade back to an iPhone 11 which is the last iPhone with an LCD (correction iPhone SE has an LCD still). No more headaches, no more EYE STRAIN. I can spend hours staring at an LCD no problems.
Then we go back to pitchforks & torches.The problem is, what happens when the entire iPhone line shifts to OLED?
Even on Android phones you'd be hard pressed to find any flagship with an LCD panel nowadays.
I just did the same thing tonight. Downgraded from 14 Pro back to my XR. I couldn't take the eye strain anymore.The PWM is so bad with the flickering on these phones I had to downgrade back to an iPhone 11 which is the last iPhone with an LCD (correction iPhone SE has an LCD still). No more headaches, no more EYE STRAIN. I can spend hours staring at an LCD no problems.
Difference is, Apple designs Apple silicone from ground up and the core technology behind it is Apple engineering and TSMC manufacturers them. But Samsung has the core technology in display and Apple tweaks them to their spec.Do you say Congrats TSMC for Apples processors?
Difference is, Apple designs Apple silicone from ground up and the core technology behind it is Apple engineering and TSMC manufacturers them. But Samsung has the core technology in display and Apple tweaks them to their spec.
Are you implying Snapdragon is the best processor? When did they beat Apple silicone?Qualcomm takes ARM cores and builds processor around them (tweaks them). So I guess next time Qualcomm releases a new Snapdragon you’ll be saying “Congrats ARM”?