Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not true. They still sell more of the pro line then lower phones. It just shows people less likely to get the base 15 vs 14 as they aren't worth the extra money for the cheaper phones. Almost 1/2 of all iPhones were the top of the marketing ladder. That is great marketing.

The graph shows 45% Pro/Max. The rest is non-Pro. Apple definitely sells more non-Pro devices.
 
I think we've reached the point where the pain-in-the-ass factor of switching your phones is n't even worth the new features you get. This is now a mature market and year-over-year updates are really not exciting anymore.

I upgraded from a 12 Pro Max to a 15 Pro Max because AT&T offered me a deal too good to pass up... but this upgrade was easy the least exciting phone upgrade I've ever had. The actual difference in your day-to-day experience is barely even noticeable.

I think we're witnessing the market go from an average of a 2 year life cycle to a 3 or 4 year life cycle and no one even cares.
 
The pale/faded-looking colors of the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus (left side) are also a step backwards from the more vibrant colors of the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus (right side), IMO.

View attachment 2373916
I think you are onto something. I suspect the washed out colors of the 15 series is driving some sales towards the models with more vibrant colors (and that's saying something as the 14 series doesn't have the most inspiring color palette either unless you are a big fan or red or yellow). The 13 series seems to still be doing pretty well too for the 2 year old option (honestly, I wanted to hold onto my 2 year old green 13 until Apple made another green one that wasn't so pale).
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
iPhone 15/15 Plus can be considered an iPhone 14 Pro/Pro Max since it uses the same A16 Bionic but in an aluminum body, no telephoto, no Pro Motion, uses USB Type C instead of Lightning...

iPhone 14/14 Plus can be considered an iPhone 13 Pro/Pro Max since it uses the same A15 Bionic but in an aluminum body, no telephoto, no Pro Motion...
 
The graph shows 45% Pro/Max. The rest is non-Pro. Apple definitely sells more non-Pro devices.
The Pro devices would do even worse if Apple made the lower phones have 120 hz OLED screens and the newest A series chips. The goal is profit, not volume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
My sister in law upgraded from a 12 to a 256GB 14 Pro for 5 bucks a month with trade in. There was ZERO reason to pay full price for a 15 with aggressive carrier deals like that.
Apple needs to stop iterating and get back to innovating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
You either care about features in which case you get the Pro or you don't care at all and just want a decent iPhone at the lowest possible price, in which case you get an older generation of phone which to MOST people is indistinguishable from the current version.

My husband brought home a loaner iPhone 13 recently (he is a doctor and this was issued to him for taking certain pages). And even I who research this stuff all the time, couldn't tell at first that it wasn't the latest model. For average customers they must all be exactly the same so why spend money on the most recent one.

I'll still be getting my husband an iPhone 15 when it is time to upgrade due to usb-c. But I totally understand why most people don't care.

I honestly think apple could release the base iPhone once every 2 years since they are hell-bent on intentionally holding back this model.
 
If the economy is crap, then how is it that "The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max share hardly changed compared to the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max the same quarter a year ago?"

Maybe the real reason is there aren't any real improvements from iPhone 14 and 14 Plus to iPhone 15 and 15 Plus
People that can afford a Pro or Pro Max are less price sensitive.
 
Hopefully iPhone 16 will offer more value. But judging from current rumours, very likely not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
Maybe iPhone sales will improve when Apple offers AI capabilities on iPhone 16. Qualcomm said yesterday during their earnings conference call that their AI smartphone chips are seeing strong demand, especially in China, which could explain why iPhone sales in China are down. Chinese buyers preferring AI-capable smartphones from Oppo, Huawei, Vivo, etc.


May 1 (Reuters) - Qualcomm on Wednesday forecast quarterly sales and adjusted profit above Wall Street expectations, driven by selling more and pricier chips into Android smartphones with artificial-intelligence features.

After a smartphone slump last year, Qualcomm said that China's Android market - which has become critical to the company - has started to pick up, with consumers there shifting toward purchasing higher-priced devices that can accommodate AI chatbots.

The company said its sales to Chinese smartphone makers have grown 40% in the first half of its fiscal year, a sign of recovery in that market.

"AI is driving a lot of silicon content in those devices because of the expected computational capability to run those models," Chief Executive Cristiano Amon told analysts on a conference call. "Users want to buy a more capable phone that can run AI."

Qualcomm's forecast for the recovery in China's smartphone market recovery may not extend to Apple's iPhone.
 
But, but, the titanium!!

Looks like iOS system and battery performance nerfs incoming to the 12, 13 and 14 series...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.