Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s not a Thunderbolt cable.

iPads don’t come with a Thunderbolt cable and neither does the M1 MacBook Air.

TB cables are a lot thicker and less flexible than regular USB cables, they would be a bit annoying as your daily use cable.
My question is why can’t I use the iPhone 15 USB-C cable to get USB transfer speeds? It’s not a Thunderbolt port.
 
That’s not what this article says.
This article says “there is a 1-meter black Thunderbolt cable that enables USB 3.1”, it just says “one exists”. It does not say “The 1-meter black Thunderbolt cable is the ONLY cable that will enable USB 3.1”.
 
This article says “there is a 1-meter black Thunderbolt cable that enables USB 3.1”, it just says “one exists”. It does not say “The 1-meter black Thunderbolt cable is the ONLY cable that will enable USB 3.1”.
This makes zero sense. It is unprecedented that a USB-C cable is not capable of offering USB 3 speeds. That’s what it’s designed for.
 
This makes zero sense. It is unprecedented that a USB-C cable is not capable of offering USB 3 speeds. That’s what it’s designed for.
Googled, picked the first cable in the sponsored links.

If unprecedented means “fairly common”, then you’re right.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Haha
Reactions: darngooddesign
Okay… So if Apple sell a 1mtr charge cable that says 60W for £19 and if you up that to 2mtrs it is then 240W for £29…. Question being:- What is the wattage of the USB C Charge Cable shipped with the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max?
 
Last edited:
This makes zero sense. It is unprecedented that a USB-C cable is not capable of offering USB 3 speeds. That’s what it’s designed for.
Regardless of what Apple should have included, what you said is simply not true. The majority of USB-C cables are not capable of 3+ speeds. Now if you had said “…cable which comes with faster drives” then I would agree with you.
 
Regardless of what Apple should have included, what you said is simply not true. The majority of USB-C cables are not capable of 3+ speeds. Now if you had said “…cable which comes with faster drives” then I would agree with you.
USB-C came out after USB 3 was already fairly popular. I assumed that meant all those cables met the 3.1 spec. Who would use a USB-C cable at 2.0 speeds? Those devices use USB-A connectors.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.