Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,482
37,740


The first reviews of the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max were shared today by select media outlets and YouTube channels, ahead of the devices launching on Friday. Also check out our iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus review roundup.

16-pro.jpg

iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max models feature 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch displays, respectively, up from the 6.1-inch iPhone 15 Pro and 6.7-inch iPhone 15 Pro Max. Other new features include a Camera Control button, an A18 Pro chip optimized for Apple Intelligence, a 48-megapixel Ultra Wide camera, support for 4K at 120 FPS video recording, longer battery life, faster charging over MagSafe, and improved microphones.

Reviews

The Verge's Nilay Patel on the Camera Control:

It's pretty fun to flip the phone on its side and shoot with the button like a normal camera, although the physical button is a bit stiff — a few Verge staffers found themselves moving the phone slightly when pushing all the way down to take a photo, although I thought it was fine.

I found myself accidentally opening the camera a lot at first since I'm left-handed and the button is placed where my fingers tend to rest when I hold the phone. You can set it to require a double-click, and that solved the problem for me. You can also set the button to open third-party camera apps; it works well with the new version of Halide that's been updated to support that functionality.

He concluded that the Camera Control is not a huge improvement:

Overall, the button is very nice to have, but that’s about it right now — as it exists today, it’s not a huge improvement over shooting photos with any other iPhone.

He believes the iPhone 16 Pro has only iterative upgrades at launch, with Apple Intelligence and more Camera Control capabilities coming later this year:
As it exists today, it's a remarkably iterative update to the iPhone 15 Pro — it's hard to find reasons to upgrade from last year’s model. And I'm not at all convinced that it's worth upgrading to the 16 Pro from older Pro models just yet, either — the Camera Control and Action Button are nice, but not game changing, and unless you're excited about dialing in the new Photographic Styles and the new tone control, you might find the even-brighter-and-flatter photos to actually be a step backward in photo processing.

The smaller iPhone 16 Pro fared well in Tom's Guide's Mark Spoonauer battery-life test:

On the Tom's Guide battery life test, which involves continuous web surfing at 150 nits of screen brightness, the new iPhone 16 Pro lasted 14 hours and 7 minutes, which is a big jump from the 10:53 from the iPhone 15 Pro, and enough to just crack our list of the best phone battery life.

While it was believed that the iPhone 16 Pro supports up to 45W wired charging, Spoonauer did not actually see any improvement during his testing.

Gizmodo's Florence Ion on real-world battery life:

For now, I can tell you the iPhone 16 Pro, with its smaller battery pack, performed impressively on a day out into the city. I still had 20% battery toward the end of my transit ride back to the car after six hours out and about with the AirPods 4 with ANC engaged in my ears. I also started the day with 83% on the iPhone 16 Pro, only to end up at 24% battery after seven hours of installing software, shooting photos, taking a phone call, listening to a podcast, and playing a little Apple Arcade.

Geekbench benchmark results already confirmed that the A18 Pro chip is up to 15% faster than the A17 Pro chip, as Apple advertised. iPhone 16 Pro models continue to have the fastest CPU in any smartphone, and that seems to be evident.

WIRED's Julian Chokkattu on performance:

These phones are powered by the A18 Pro chipset, which is far and away the most powerful smartphone processor according to my benchmark tests, easily blowing away much of the Android competition. It has one extra graphics core compared to the A18 in the iPhone 16, but the CPU cache sizes are larger, which means as a whole, the A18 Pro is still generally faster than the A18.

PetaPixel's Chris Niccolls touched on the iPhone 16 Pro's new 48-megapixel Ultra Wide camera in his photography-focused review:

The ultra-wide camera has also been improved to a new 48-megapixel sensor with autofocus that can deliver decent macro capabilities with more detail than before. The aperture is the same as before at f/2.2. I like now having the option of 48-megapixel RAW files although, in real-world situations, the resolution does not match that of a standard Bayer pattern sensor at 48 megapixels. Oddly, Apple also decided not to implement the option for a 24-megapixel HEIF file, which it does have on the main fusion camera. The extra megapixels are unnecessary for social media applications but at least landscape and macro photographers can squeeze some more detail out of their RAW files.

He also touched on recording 4K video at 120 FPS:

On the video front, the headline addition is the ability to record up to 4K 120p with a very high-quality look thanks to ProRes Log. You can also retime the 120p footage down to 1/5 speed for a 24-frame-per-second timeline right on the phone and it will show it to you in real-time as it is rendering. Speed ramping can be done very simply within the same interface allowing for some dramatic looking slow motion shots.

Engadget's Cherlynn Low on the new "studio-quality" microphones:

For the most part, going to Cinematic or Studio modes from Standard resulted in a noticeable reduction in environmental noise. My favorite is Studio, which generally seemed to improve voice clarity as well, making people sound like they could be talking on a podcast.
Videos

... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: iPhone 16 Pro Reviews: 'Iterative' Upgrades… For Now
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Michaelgtrusa
TBH; I'm shocked that a massive company such as Apple with so much talent in there cant ship Apple Intelligence at launch. I feel like there is something in terms of politics/approvals going behind the scenes thats impacting it and not purely just need more time to test it.
 
TBH; I'm shocked that a massive company such as Apple with so much talent in there cant ship Apple Intelligence at launch. I feel like there is something in terms of politics/approvals going behind the scenes thats impacting it and not purely just need more time to test it.

No surprise for me. A.I. is not a "just throw one switch in a compiler"-type thing like the same spun for the Silicon transition now 4+ years ago with lots of apps still not converted. Apparently that "one switch" is a HEAVY switch. ;)

A.I. is quite complex... much more so to deeply integrate... and Apple was apparently very late to get on that train. Those already with it deployed have been on it for many years. Apple is trying to catch up in less than one year. And Apple doesn't want the bad press in an implementation that is average or worse but is likely striving for above average or best. That's much harder to do.

I hope they are successful at the pace they are trying to move. But that's a tall order... even for the Almighty. My wild guess is that refined functionality that basically just "passes through" (already worked out by third party suppliers) will work well. Anything Apple is trying to pioneer is probably going to be refined in iOS 20+ a few more years from now. But we'll see. Maybe the Almighty can work wonders? Or hopefully the Car software was loaded with easily transferrable A.I.-like goodies that can be repurposed and drop right into the platforms.
 
Last edited:
TBH; I'm shocked that a massive company such as Apple with so much talent in there cant ship Apple Intelligence at launch. I feel like there is something in terms of politics/approvals going behind the scenes thats impacting it and not purely just need more time to test it.

Having professionally worked in tech over my career, I'm not shocked at all... knowing all tech companies, even Apple, do not have infinite resources and capacity.
 
More screen, next year 7.2” please
We already dont wear our phones in our pockets but in our hands and briefcases/backpack

As long as they keep offering the regular-sized model for those of us that do keep our phones in our pockets and aren't glued to a screen, go for it.

It's disappointing that the weight is back up with the Pro. I've always hated the weight of my 13 Pro (it's not too heavy, I just don't like it), and was happy to see it going down with the 15 Pro, but now it's basically the same.. Bummer..
 
I’m upgrading from the 15 Pro Max (since I’m on the Apple Upgrade Program) but this definitely seems to be an “S” year. It’s a refined 15 Pro with slightly bigger screens, better battery life, better camera and faster processor.

I’m ok with it, but I know a lot aren’t. Smartphones have more or less hit the refinement stage, like cars, watches, TV’s, etc.

Year over year updates are going to be relatively minor but if you upgrade every 2-3 years, they add up.
 
As long as they keep offering the regular-sized model for those of us that do keep our phones in our pockets and aren't glued to a screen, go for it.

It's disappointing that the weight is back up with the Pro. I've always hated the weight of my 13 Pro (it's not too heavy, I just don't like it), and was happy to see it going down with the 15 Pro, but now it's basically the same.. Bummer..
Even the regular size went from 4” to 6.3”
The regular phone soon will be the former max size 6.7”
 
TBH; I'm shocked that a massive company such as Apple with so much talent in there cant ship Apple Intelligence at launch. I feel like there is something in terms of politics/approvals going behind the scenes thats impacting it and not purely just need more time to test it.

They are between a rock and a hard place. Need to roll out AI asap to keep up with the tech Joneses but if it's done badly would be a PR nightmare. The right play would've been to roll out Apple Intelligence when it's fully baked on iOS 19 but that stock price won't prop itself so here we are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r and 2761216
I’m upgrading from the 15 Pro Max (since I’m on the Apple Upgrade Program) but this definitely seems to be an “S” year. It’s a refined 15 Pro with slightly bigger screens, better battery life, better camera and faster processor.

I’m ok with it, but I know a lot aren’t. Smartphones have more or less hit the refinement stage, like cars, watches, TV’s, etc.

Year over year updates are going to be relatively minor but if you upgrade every 2-3 years, they add up.
Felt like that with the 15 Pro too. It had an action button, and a better zoom lens. Feels a bit more of an upgrade even from that this year to be honest. Which isn’t too bad.

I remember just 3G and 3Gs having small upgrades, as well. People freaked over 2 small upgrades. There’s loads of them here (yeah there could be more) but I’m happy with upgrading.
 
TBH; I'm shocked that a massive company such as Apple with so much talent in there cant ship Apple Intelligence at launch. I feel like there is something in terms of politics/approvals going behind the scenes thats impacting it and not purely just need more time to test it.
More developers and money doesn't mean things happen faster. Take a look at the gaming industry right now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.