Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The EU directive allows for full wireless charging without a port, as long as it's not propritary.
To my knowledge, wireless charging is not part of the regulation.
If a device charges via cable, it must include USB-C. MacBooks with MagSafe are acceptable because they have USB-C in addition to the MagSafe port. If there’s a device that is ONLY charged wirelessly, there is no issue with it having proprietary charging hardware, such as Apple Watch.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Lightning had the potential to be developed and Apple could have allowed others to do so.

Lighting is a superior port (imo) given it’s a single solid piece and smaller than usb c with no central thin connections.
The last home button iPad Pros had USB 3.0 Lighting but Apple only made use of it in their camera connection kit. Try didnt even do a cable to take advantage of it.
 
To my knowledge, wireless charging is not part of the regulation.
If a device charges via cable, it must include USB-C. MacBooks with MagSafe are acceptable because they have USB-C in addition to the MagSafe port. If there’s a device that is ONLY charged wirelessly, there is no issue with it having proprietary charging hardware, such as Apple Watch.
iPhone MagSafe isnt even proprietary any more now that Apple gave it to the QI2 standard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Ok, I get it, the 17 Air is the 'test-subject' so they know how to make a new mini later.
I can wait ☺️
You may not like what you’re waiting for if this new “mini” turns out to be a folding iPhone. Then again, maybe you will. Anyway, the 17 “Air” sounds like another upsell phone to push people to the Pro models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
It will indeed be a very thin device. Only disappointing thing is the presence of a single lens on the back of the device. Waiting to hear more about the phone in the coming months.
 
If that camera bump is real i will never buy another iPhone.

I am already looking at alternatives because Apple hasn't innovated anything in a few years, but one thing it still had going for itself is design - despite the notch, it was still looking better than any Android.

The addition of this Pixel-esque bump will remove this advantage as well - iPhone will be just like any other fugly phone. It hurts my eyes.
 
Apple caused usb c. They could have allowed licensing of lightning to other manufacturers or just let anyone use it many companies would have quickly jumped on board and it would have become standard.

But no. Apple help it as proprietary.
I love USB-C because I can use it to charge all my devices. It's not flimsy either, it's fine.

It's the best feature the 15 pro had over the 14.. well second best, after the weight loss..
 
If that camera bump is real i will never buy another iPhone.

I am already looking at alternatives because Apple hasn't innovated anything in a few years, but one thing it still had going for itself is design - despite the notch, it was still looking better than any Android.

The addition of this Pixel-esque bump will remove this advantage as well - iPhone will be just like any other fugly phone. It hurts my eyes.
What alternatives are you considering?
 
If that camera bump is real i will never buy another iPhone.

I am already looking at alternatives because Apple hasn't innovated anything in a few years, but one thing it still had going for itself is design - despite the notch, it was still looking better than any Android.

The addition of this Pixel-esque bump will remove this advantage as well - iPhone will be just like any other fugly phone. It hurts my eyes.
This wart is the fugly that turns you off?

Apple has had fugly camera warts for years now. This fugly wart isn't any worse than the other lopsided phones Apple makes.

I'm laughing about the off-center USB port thing when the fugly off-center camera wart is RIGHT THERE IN YOUR FACE and has been for years.
 
I think it's going to be the opposite.

The ONLY way this abomination will sell is if it turns out to be dirt cheap. Nobody actually wants the reduced battery or the extra-bendable thin phone. It won't sell as well as the mini.

There might be some initial sales, but once the JerryRigEverything video comes out, it's done.

I think people on internet tech forums may be surprised how few people actually visit internet tech forums, or watch niche YouTubers.

If this device is what the rumors say, then Apple's engineers know they are creating it for the real world, and not for people who hold a phone up to a camera and forcefully bend it, for clicks.

No one here - not a single person - knows how this device will sell, whether it will be any more or less bendable than other smartphones, what the camera is like, or the screen, or the battery life, or what its retail price will be. No one.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
I love USB-C because I can use it to charge all my devices. It's not flimsy either, it's fine.

It's the best feature the 15 pro had over the 14.. well second best, after the weight loss..
It works, but after a while of being in stressed position and dirty pockets, it gets kinda loose and is a bit more difficult to clean that lightning. I’ve never had a loose lightning port but struggle with the usb-c ports on my Mac mini not being tight enough every now and then.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.