That’s not gonna happen.If I could run iOS EU version on a Samsung Ultra, that would be my phone.
That’s not gonna happen.If I could run iOS EU version on a Samsung Ultra, that would be my phone.
It’s funny, I pulled out my iPhone 6 recently and it felt like the future. The thinnest phone they ever made and it is very light as well. In fact I was even slightly astonished once again that everything could fit in such a minuscule chassis and yet have full functionality.
It essentially felt as if it were the minimum thickness/weight that you would care to make a phone it even if they could be made smaller. I could nearly imagine flipping it around like a TV remote, and caring just as less if it went flying across the room. I think this is where we should go for the future of phones. Take all the advancements of current phones and get them back into tiny packages of a few years ago.
Obviously it’s not. Fantasy world where companies that act massively in the 1% best interest are regulated to require interoperability.That’s not gonna happen.
Some people can think for themselves and know exactly what they want after using all the options. Others don’t care. You obviously don’t care. Don’t question my mental health by it. It’s against the rules here.I cant imagine having such strong preferences about a phone. Are you ok?
This is why it's a good thing there are options. I can't stand Samsung phones, I haven't seen one I liked yet. There have been one or two Pixels that I haven't hated, but I've not yet seen another phone that can compete with an iPhone in my estimation. That's not to say it won't happen, the competition is working hard to close the gap! My experience with iPhones just makes other phones seem to be cheap 'no frills' competitors.I really like the ecosystem Apple has but it shouldn’t require one brand to make an ecosystem work. It’s the definition of anticompetitive practices. This will end eventually.
I would love to run an EU iOS device that’s actually by Apple but updated iPhone that’s the exact Samsung Ultra but has an A-series SoC in it. Samsung makes nicer devices. Apple has a better ecosystem. Apple is better at the SoC but they’re all so fast right now for phones it doesn’t really matter.
If I could run iOS EU version on a Samsung Ultra, that would be my phone. I like the Pixel 8 Pro, but it’s not perfect. It feels better than iPhone but it’s not as durable - having dropped my 15PM so many times I know it can sustain more drops. The Pixel is Google which has downsides. But I am not against any company. I prefer to buy Apple products but I want not an open OS that’s open source, I want to do whatever I want with my phone, tablet and computer. They shouldn’t have to be the same brand to work together. This is what an anticompetitive company does to make money. It’s beyond fair and the tech is just too widely used to allow any company to act like Apple, Google, Meta and so on.
The way YouTube videos are made now, they'll have their scripts written before the phone is released. Reality has nothing to do with it any more.I hope they reinforce the frame or else "bend-gate" will be back with a vengeance. I can see the flood of youtube videos now.
People did’t ask for AirPods, the iPhone, or AirTags, yet they have been fantastic successes. Customers famously don’t know what they want until you shown it to them.Not that I think it's going to be a bad product, but... Who asked for this, exactly?
I wonder if it ever occurred to you that it’s the overall volume of the device that you struggle with? It’s not only the thickness, but also the size of it, ie the larger screen that so many think is the best thing since sliced bread.Amazing, this would solve the huge pain point of current iPhones that are almost 8 millimeters thick! Every day I'm struggling with my iPhone and I keep thinking, "man, if only it were one millimeter thinner, the world would be a better place!"
Even though Sammy has improved the Flip, she is hesitant to go back to it. She’s currently using a 1+ 12.Ha yeah well there ya go. Third time you say?
That's why I'm thinking Apple's warranty department ran the numbers and the executives took one look at them and said "yeah, we aren't doing that."
iPhone 17 Mini is needed. Not Slim.
Yes. The real breakthrough, taking a lot of courage, is a phone that can lay flat. You can do it, Apple!I’d prefer they just even out the back to get rid of the camera bump.
Personally, I'd choose the option where there's no camera bump. The selfie camera is good enough for me so just put one flush on the back too.Would you please think about that for a second?
Here are your options if you want a flush camera island:
- make the iPhone thick enough = much thicker and heavier device
- make the camera island thinker = big reduction in camera quality
I don't think you realise those are 2 terrible options. So what Apple does by having a great camera that sticks out is by far the best option.
I did. I don’t like heavy and thick phones with camera bumps. Hope ‘Air’ won’t have camera bump at all and only one camera.Not that I think it's going to be a bad product, but... Who asked for this, exactly?
More likely, thinner wallet to match a thinner phoneThinner phone = Thinner price??![]()