I’m not expecting anything, I’m just predicting what is gonna happen.Why do you expect that we all have to embrace folding phones?
I’m not expecting anything, I’m just predicting what is gonna happen.Why do you expect that we all have to embrace folding phones?
Well, if we're playing predictions, mine is that folding phones will be a thing for five or ten years, then they'll disappear again, awaiting their next resurgence.I’m not expecting anything, I’m just predicting what is gonna happen.
Once again. It will be funny once it happen.Well, if we're playing predictions, mine is that folding phones will be a thing for five or ten years, then they'll disappear again, awaiting their next resurgence.
I’m not suggesting nor asking. I’m just telling what is gonna happen.It will not.
The pure size of Apple doesn’t really allow for much secrecy when it comes to the products in the pipeline.
We usually know at least a rough estimate of what will be released the following year in the world of Apple, if a foldable were only nine months away we would absolutely know.
For instance, we already knew all of the screen sizes of the entire iPhone 12 lineup, from the mini all the way to the Pro Max, in April 2019, a full 18 months before the phone released.
All of this to say, a foldable is absolutely not happening in 2025.
Now, 2026/27? Absolutely a possibility, we will just have to wait and see
It is possible that the Air eventually becomes a folding phone a year or two after it’s released, but what is certain is that the fourth iPhone in 2025 will not be a folding phone.
If it were, we would absolutely know that folding devices at Apple weregoing into trial production months ago , and we would be hearing exact screen specifications and resolutions by now.
Even the latest reports that do mention a foldable say it won’t arrive until the end of 2026 at the earliest, meanwhile this “iPhone Air” will probably start mass production within months.
Personally, I don’t expect a folding iPhone until 2027 with the 20th anniversary iPhone where they can brag about how the beautiful new iPhone Fold “sets the benchmark for the next 20 years of smart phones” or some ridiculous marketing spin like that.
Then they can proudly announce that it “starts at $1999 for 256 GB and 8 GB of RAM”.
Samsung did it and it’s selling quite well. It is the Samsung Z Fold. Actually I have fellows that own it, and are happy and satisfied with it.The absolute last thing you would do with a smartphone is make it fold vertically.
As you, I rather like to fold it horizontally, anyway I think Apple will launch both versions, just as Samsung did (Z Fold & Z Flip).Imagine how stupid Apple would have to be to make it fold vertically.
Yes, I think it would be very thick. It seems thin to you because you’re just looking at an image with a black profile, but like with the iPad Pro, things change when you hold physical objects in your hands.WTH are you guys even taking about? With this new slimmer design, just make the depth the same as the back camera bump so it’s flush. It would still be a thin phone. And why would a flush back change the camera layout?
Check the image I had to make. You three think that’s a BIG disaster?🤦🏻♂️
Have a Pixel 8 Pro also.Go buy an Android!
Have you ever realized that what you’re describing and dreaming with, is an Android? No kidding!
ContentNot that I think it's going to be a bad product, but... Who asked for this, exactly?
Or maybe Apple got inspired by Samsung plans because there is much more going on in the Samsung world today than there is on Apple.I’m sure this is just a total coincidence.
Samsung has always acted like little brother
Its going to be lighter, this is what is important.Amazing, this would solve the huge pain point of current iPhones that are almost 8 millimeters thick! Every day I'm struggling with my iPhone and I keep thinking, "man, if only it were one millimeter thinner, the world would be a better place!"
170g is not that light. Its same as a Nokia 5110 from 25 years ago. Thats 6oz in freedom units.Current base model iPhones are already very light. And the Pros are dense due to the stuff inside them, not much way around that. You really think the thinness will be that noticeable? In a good way, I mean?
We don’t know that. Maybe giving too much weight to MR posters requirements. I didn’t think apple would do that, but it’s starting to make sense.Did Apple gather this data using the same means as the data that showed the market wanted an iPhone mini or iPhone Plus?
You know thats where they’re heading. They will do it. They will tell us about it. And fans will lap up the product.It's not about thinness or miniaturization of technology. It's about Apple reducing the environmental impact of their products. Apple will tell us how great the iPhone Air will be for the environment as Apple will use less materials to manufacture them and they'll be able to ship them in thinner boxes, both of which will help reduce carbon emissions and use of rare-earth elements.
As I stated folding vertically gets you nothing, it’s actually pretty embarrassing humans did that.Samsung did it and it’s selling quite well. It is the Samsung Z Fold. Actually I have fellows that own it, and are happy and satisfied with it.
As you, I rather like to fold it vertically, anyway I think Apple will launch both versions, just as Samsung did (Z Fold & Z Flip).
I can see how they'd be useful, and I'd like to think I'd be careful enough with one. I just don't think they're ready for the general "my phone screen is constantly shattered" public. Not to the point where Apple is confident offering AppleCare+ on it, anyway.
170g is not that light. Its same as a Nokia 5110 from 25 years ago. Thats 6oz in freedom units.
Depends on the person I guess. Wife loved her Flip till the 3rd time the screen cracked in the hinge (Flip 3).
Only real issue I have run into (yea, I dropped mine a time or two) was my Honor Magic V2. The frame cracked. They definitely are not as rugged.
Its not relative its exactly the opposite. 170g is still 170g that is a constant. Thinner does not imply lighter you are quite right. Case in point the iphone pro is heavier than a nokia 5110 despite being 25 years newer and about 1/3 to 1/4 as thick.All relative. Does a hell of a lot more than that Nokia did. Standard iPhone is hella light compared to the Pro model, and the gap between functonality there is a lot closer than the Nokia vs standard iPhone.
I get it though, I want them to be lighter too. It's just that thinner does not necessarily imply lighter.
I really like the ecosystem Apple has but it shouldn’t require one brand to make an ecosystem work. It’s the definition of anticompetitive practices. This will end eventually.Have a Pixel 8 Pro also.
I cant imagine having such strong preferences about a phone. Are you ok?I really like the ecosystem Apple has but it shouldn’t require one brand to make an ecosystem work. It’s the definition of anticompetitive practices. This will end eventually.
I would love to run an EU iOS device that’s actually by Apple but updated iPhone that’s the exact Samsung Ultra but has an A-series SoC in it. Samsung makes nicer devices. Apple has a better ecosystem. Apple is better at the SoC but they’re all so fast right now for phones it doesn’t really matter.
If I could run iOS EU version on a Samsung Ultra, that would be my phone. I like the Pixel 8 Pro, but it’s not perfect. It feels better than iPhone but it’s not as durable - having dropped my 15PM so many times I know it can sustain more drops. The Pixel is Google which has downsides. But I am not against any company. I prefer to buy Apple products but I want not an open OS that’s open source, I want to do whatever I want with my phone, tablet and computer. They shouldn’t have to be the same brand to work together. This is what an anticompetitive company does to make money. It’s beyond fair and the tech is just too widely used to allow any company to act like Apple, Google, Meta and so on.