Look at the screenshot above... 53 is the modulation percentageWhere is the 50% number coming from?
Look at the screenshot above... 53 is the modulation percentageWhere is the 50% number coming from?
Can you explain what "modulation percentage" means?Look at the screenshot above... 53 is the modulation percentage
My OLED TV only dips in brightness for about 0.15% of the the refresh time. The dip on my Pixel 8 Pro at full brightness is about 12.5% of the total refresh time (it has very similar PWM characteristics to an iPhone, from what I've seen).The wider the bars get the worse it is typically. What I’m hoping we’re seeing, and everyone is jumping the gun on, is something similar to oled tvs. All oled tvs are technically not flicker free with a slight dip that corresponds to the refresh rate but even folks extremely sensitive to pwm barely notice. This shows up as black bars on your tv as well.
Additionally, I believe oled monitors do this as well which is why they are often certified as flicker free by 3rd party companies.
Yep, so if 0 is the lowest screen brightness, and 10 is the highest, and the modulation is 100% that means that 480 times a second the screen is going from 0-10 on the brightness scale, increasing the 'strobe' like effect. A lower modulation (even with the same low flicker rate) is better on the eyes as the difference between the min and max brightness on every flicker cycle is less.Can you explain what "modulation percentage" means?
I think the testing methodology is broken. Almost all screens, including OLED, refresh from top to bottom (or a rotated version of that). The whole screen does not strobe at the same time.Yep, so if 0 is the lowest screen brightness, and 10 is the highest, and the modulation is 100% that means that 480 times a second the screen is going from 0-10 on the brightness scale, increasing the 'strobe' like effect. A lower modulation (even with the same low flicker rate) is better on the eyes as the difference between the min and max brightness on every flicker cycle is less.
50% is still VERY high (Good OLEDs are already down below 10% like the Honor 200 Pro) so this isn't going to be much use to sensitive folk based on those numbers alone (if accurate of course)
Problem is for many of us the iPhone 11 doesn't work anymore since Apple insist on using loads of temporal dithering since iOS18 onwards... mine runs on iOS17 and it's 100% comfortable, my 'test' iPhone 11 is BAD on iOS26.So it doesn't disable PWM and it looks like the 17s are still a no go for a lot of us.
I can only hope the attention that's been drawn to the issue will have helped some people who weren't aware, and shown Apple that there is demand for a real solution. Also, Apple at least acknowledging it as a genuine accessibility issue for some people is still massive.
Hold out iPhone 11...
I did the mistake to update my 11 and i have headaches for f shake. How many days do I have to decide if to downgrade ?Problem is for many of us the iPhone 11 doesn't work anymore since Apple insist on using loads of temporal dithering since iOS18 onwards... mine runs on iOS17 and it's 100% comfortable, my 'test' iPhone 11 is BAD on iOS26.
I've actually been using my 11 more and more via iPhone mirroring these days for more comfort, I'm not sure if it's a result of iOS18 or just my general migraine/eye strain woes. So I'm definitely going to be cautious about any upgrade to iOS26.Problem is for many of us the iPhone 11 doesn't work anymore since Apple insist on using loads of temporal dithering since iOS18 onwards... mine runs on iOS17 and it's 100% comfortable, my 'test' iPhone 11 is BAD on iOS26.
Problem is for many of us the iPhone 11 doesn't work anymore since Apple insist on using loads of temporal dithering since iOS18 onwards... mine runs on iOS17 and it's 100% comfortable, my 'test' iPhone 11 is BAD on iOS26.
This makes a lot of sense. My M1 Air became unusable from Sequoia onwards, presumably dithering, had to sell it.This is the trend with LCD iPhones, iPads, and Macs: they’re utilizing even more dithering to render the 10-bit MacOS/iOS/iPadOS graphics. OLED iPhones (likely because they are somewhat closer to 10-bit) don’t engage it as often, but it’s still there. This is why I’m still on iOS 15 on my iPhone 13.
iOS 26 and the whole “Liquid Glass” design made me immediately assume they’d utilize dithering for all those gradients. What a mess.
If you're sensitive, turn the setting on! (Sadly it is not that promising so far and needs more tuning or a complete overhaul)dumb question, sure but guys it's not clear for me if that option must be ON or OFF for better eyes care .
By default is off.
Refresh rate does nothing for pwm.My phone just arrived, hoping setting the toggle feature on and reducing the refresh rate helps…as a tech enthusiast it sucks not being able to use a modern phone.
"aren't not"? Did you mean to double negative?Results on the subreddit ‘Pwm Sensitive’ aren’t not promising.
Does this setting ON eat more battery ?
This makes a lot of sense. My M1 Air became unusable from Sequoia onwards, presumably dithering, had to sell it.
Apple is forcing me out of it's ecosystem.
I'm going to try the 17PM for a short time today under 30% only with the toggle on, I will say it IS an improvement, but it's nowhere near enough for me sadly, and to only work under 30% brightness is a no-go on a phone this expensive.
Very cool development! I’m looking forward to testing this. The iPhone 14 Pro’s display caused more eye strain than the iPhone 11 Pro, so this is exciting.
Agreed, though I almost consider it a case of PWM-sensitive people having more capability (not a disability) to detect the flickering which is why they're affected. For me it wasn't Covid - I've had this sensitivity for decades. For example, when I first started in IT in the mid-1990s people of course used CRT monitors and I could immediately tell visually when someone's monitor was set to 60Hz as opposed to 72Hz. I'd tell them to check their settings and "fix" it since 72Hz is better for them and every time I was right.
Disability or superpower is irrelevant. I just hope they fixed it.
*if* Apple have done this properly, it will be very much dependent on the hardware config. A company of Apple's resources could well have done it for all models, but I suspect they'll bank on the fact that anyone afflicted with this nightmare will shell out for the Pro - I would literally pay double if I could use it symptom free!
60/75Hz iirc was what most CRT could handle and was in settings, and oh to stand aloft, in an open plan office looking out over a sea of flickering screens.
No one ever noticed. Except me.
Oh yea totaly forgot about fluorescents they would kill me. Maybe these were older tubs?I remember finding florescent bulbs kinda mesmerizing to look at because you could see the light kinda pulsating like a plasma almost like a lava lamp.
And yea I think 75hz was still noticeable. I recall setting mine to 100hz and I could still see a very faint change in brightness across the scan.
And the high pitched whine always drove me nuts!!!!
Also a lot of 2000s-2010s laptops had CPUs that would buzz/sizzle depending on their power management modes.
That's it, I'm done. Sold my Macbook Air, iPhone 11, all 4 Airtags, Apple watch and Airpods Pro 2. No choice.This makes a lot of sense. My M1 Air became unusable from Sequoia onwards, presumably dithering, had to sell it.
Apple is forcing me out of it's ecosystem.
I'm going to try the 17PM for a short time today under 30% only with the toggle on, I will say it IS an improvement, but it's nowhere near enough for me sadly, and to only work under 30% brightness is a no-go on a phone this expensive.