They won't know and they won't care. Most people cover their phone with a case, and are too busy to look up and see the other. "Oh, sorry, I wasn't aware you existed."
Haven’t a few iPhones flopped in sales in the past already?
Ok so you're asking for the phone to be bottom heavy, got it. The original comment that started this discussion claimed that the phone is top heavy, which it isn't. Not sure about what you're suggesting, you may be right. But apple probably ran some trials before settling on the current weight distribution. I'm guessing that if they went ahead and made the phones bottom heavy, this forum would be flooded with upset users about that too
No but at this point apple are actually designing a car battery with a screen to please all you people. It’s a ‘mere’ 26.2 cm thick with a 10” diagonal screen. And weights 10kg but ‘its what the people are asking for’ according to sources close to Tim Apple.
You may be right and it does sounds familiar now that you mention is, but I'm not entirely sure. So what would the additional lines mean in this scenario? That the camera bump also acts as an antenna? Or maybe it's being done to avoid running longer antenna lines the way they had to do with the iPhone 6
it is said that iphone 17 will come back to aluminium instead of glass, or maybe its just the frame
Yes, that’s how it works. At the beginning I was confused, but now the render makes sense.
Actually looking at teardowns, those cutouts in the chassis are superficial, meaning they aren't traced internally. So the external symmetry is just aesthetic. I edited my original post.
Yes, I'm serious. Is it ugly? Yes. Will I ever see the back? No. So why should I care that it's ugly?
How is this uglier than the current bump? Which I agree is kinda ugly but I'm used to it by now. Square bumps, rectangular bumps, what's the difference?
