code-m
macrumors 601
Acceptable margin of error that will be not perceivable is real-world usage.I wonder how much of a difference it is between the 17e and 17. It's just 8 points. What difference does that make?
Acceptable margin of error that will be not perceivable is real-world usage.I wonder how much of a difference it is between the 17e and 17. It's just 8 points. What difference does that make?
There is one tiny catch, as the iPhone 17e has a 4-core GPU, whereas the iPhone 17 has a 5-core GPU.
That's impossible until they figure out how to make folded optics or metalens tech to produce images as good as what we have now. It will happen eventually but not yet.Now just imagine if they also made it flush with the back...
I am glad to get 5 years of updates without needing a new phone.
Physics wasn’t a problem for the 4, 4S, 5, 5S, and SE. Want a newer example with 48MP? Pixel 10a. Yeah, the Pixel 10a is 8.9mm thick (17e is 7.8mm, but 17 Pro/Max is already 8.75mm - with bump 9.48mm and whopping 13.18mm respectively). I’d take a uniform size of 8.9mm with a 48MP camera (and Apple’s photo pipeline vs Google) than a phone masquerading as thin with a huge physical eyesore of a plateau. And you’d get the added bonus of a little more room for more battery.That's impossible until they figure out how to make folded optics or metalens tech to produce images as good as what we have now. It will happen eventually but not yet.
Well, technically it’s the proI still think the normal iPhone 17 is the best iPhone out right now.
I’ll worry about it if my score sucks on iPhone 18 Pro MaxZolotech routinely gets over 10000. I’ve gotten it, also, on iOS 26.3
Just an update as I’ve heard a rumor that iOS 26.4 improved performance. I have just ran Geekbench again on the same device:I’ve just done it on my 17 Pro Max…