Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Now just imagine if they also made it flush with the back...
That's impossible until they figure out how to make folded optics or metalens tech to produce images as good as what we have now. It will happen eventually but not yet.
 
Yep, that score lines up with having 80% of the GPU cores. It’s unlikely to cause a problem in any application that runs fine on the 5-core phones. I wish it had a second camera though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zapmymac
That's impossible until they figure out how to make folded optics or metalens tech to produce images as good as what we have now. It will happen eventually but not yet.
Physics wasn’t a problem for the 4, 4S, 5, 5S, and SE. Want a newer example with 48MP? Pixel 10a. Yeah, the Pixel 10a is 8.9mm thick (17e is 7.8mm, but 17 Pro/Max is already 8.75mm - with bump 9.48mm and whopping 13.18mm respectively). I’d take a uniform size of 8.9mm with a 48MP camera (and Apple’s photo pipeline vs Google) than a phone masquerading as thin with a huge physical eyesore of a plateau. And you’d get the added bonus of a little more room for more battery.

I agree it may be a challenge or even impossible with current camera lens tech to cram the 17 Pro/Max cameras into a 9mm phone, but it’s not impossible to make the 17e camera flush.
 
This and the base 17 will really be a great phone for basic use types of people, and/or getting someone into the Apple ecosystem (for better or worse) 💯✅
 
The amount of people who will play graphically challenging games or use it to edit video beyond the simple edits provided by photos, is precisely 0.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeanCorp
I’ve just done it on my 17 Pro Max…
Just an update as I’ve heard a rumor that iOS 26.4 improved performance. I have just ran Geekbench again on the same device:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3083.png
    IMG_3083.png
    228.5 KB · Views: 22
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.