Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 17e Looking Less Likely — Here's Why
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The iPhone 17 Air is essentially the 17e, but at a higher price point.
Apple won't let users bypass its Pro line for a would-be large-screen, large-battery, standard-camera iPhone 17 Plus. That’s why the Plus is gone. Of course, the poor sales numbers of the past 60Hz Plus justify the cancellation of the 17 Plus from both angles: "People don’t want a 60Hz large phone" and "People might want a 120Hz large phone without paying the Pro Max premium!"
Apple won't let users bypass its Pro line for a would-be large-screen, large-battery, standard-camera iPhone 17 Plus. That’s why the Plus is gone. Of course, the poor sales numbers of the past 60Hz Plus justify the cancellation of the 17 Plus from both angles: "People don’t want a 60Hz large phone" and "People might want a 120Hz large phone without paying the Pro Max premium!"
Then, I’m afraid, you’ll have to wait probably more than 5 years if you’re expecting an all screen iPhone “SE”.
The first iPhone expected to be all screen might get released in 2027 as a 20th anniversary iPhone, and that will be an expensive flagship model. Usually the innovations of the flagship models (like the Pro) take one or more years to be available on the standard models, and then, a few more years until they arrive to the “SE” price range.
So I’m afraid you’re set for a long, long wait.
Sounds great. I am not afraid of waiting as long as the design of new device is good. Just upgraded from iPad Air 2 to iPad A16
Oh! Nice upgrade! The iPad Air 2 was ahead of its time, the reason why it keep so many years of support. And the first to have a laminated display, which later became an iPad Pro feature, and only recently it was used for the Air models. Great iPad, we purchased the previous one, the OG iPad Air in 2013, and it didn’t last as long as its successor due to having half the memory (only 1GB) and a less powerful A7 SoC, because IIRC the Air 2 had a Pro-level A8X chip. So a great device to enjoy for a lot of years.Sounds great. I am not afraid of waiting as long as the design of new device is good. Just upgraded from iPad Air 2 to iPad A16
Same for the iPad A16, great device with 6GB of RAM that I’m pretty sure it will last you many more years.
I do have an iPhone SE 3 as my main smartphone, mind you. And it’s great. I’m also thinking about holding onto it for many more years, for the simple reason that I find LCD screens much more comfortable to look at, and this is the last LCD iPhone ever made. So I’m even more screwed than you, because you may see an all screen iPhone “SE” in 7, 8 or even 10 years, but I probably won’t ever see an LCD iPhone in my life, and the technology that may come after OLED is still not well known.
I don’t mind the notch. But I really hope OLED screens become more comfortable for the eyes in the coming years.
Last edited:
Then why did they name it 16e, it's clear they expected to upgrade it annually alongside the rest of the range.
Which doesn't preclude Apple releasing a new version every year. In fact it's the opposite, when I buy a new phone every five or six years I want something that is bang up to date.
Maybe they expected it to be annually released when they designed it and made the marketing stuff, and now, due to increased costs, they don’t see an annual refresh worth it from a business point of view.
Honestly, I don’t see it that strange, regular iPhones keep being sold one and even two years after their release, even with an outdated number.
The Air starting at $900 and the E starting at $600 will definitely make people remember the E. Expect general starting pricing to be: E $600, iPhone $800, Air $900 and Pro 1000.
I just bought one 2 days ago for my dad, he is switching from X. I’m very glad this model is around.
The refresh cycle length is not so relevant if you upgrade once every 5-6 years, as even if Apple updated their iPhones once every 2-3 years, you would still get a better deal. In fact, there is very little noticeable difference between iPhone 13 and iPhone 16 (both Pro and regular). Both are running the same OS, the screens are the same, a faster chip is not so noticeable for day-to-day tasks. More RAM is good, but is only relevant if you want to dive into early Apple Intelligence model. Improvements, yes, but nothing revolutionary.
Agreed! Other than usb-c (which is a major improvement), my upgrade from a 13 Pro my 16 Pro was the most boring and uninteresting upgrade in years.
Last edited:
I put a $15 MagSafe case on my XR and used MagSafe accessories, accessories I now use with my 15 Pro. If I owned a 16E I would put a MagSafe case on it as well.
People assigning decisions to Apple which Apple never said they would do, based on what they read on a rumor site, is nothing new either.
REVEALED: Here's Who Uses iPhone Cases And Why
We ran a survey to find out what iPhone users have cases and why.
www.businessinsider.com
Sorry 86%.
I've seen maybe 4-5 people, in my lifetime, using a caseless iPhone.
Last edited:
This iPhone will probably not get a price cut as it’s deliberately the bottom tier iPhone
Just like the previous models never ever got a price cut
Yeah. There is no real reason for a price cut since it falls solidly in the “free with contract” category in the US.
I disagree. The Apple will keep selling the 16E and the 17 Air will be a more premium phone. It will be the 12” MacBook (17 Air) to the MacBook Air (16 E).
I went to the Apple Store on vacation, and I tried the 16e demo. Honestly, I’d pick one up if I didn’t use the ultra wide camera on my iPhone 15 as often as I did. I loved the design as it reminded me of the iPhone 4/4s. I could probably live without MagSafe built in and use a case even though it may not be magnetically strong.