Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Stolen data from Apple manufacturing partner Tata Electronics appears to reveal that the iPhone 18 Pro will use different modem chips depending on the market it is sold in, with U.S. models retaining Qualcomm hardware while international models will feature Apple's in-house C2 modem.

Apple-5G-Modem-Feature-Triad.jpg


The finding emerged from a wide-ranging cyberattack on Tata, which alongside Foxconn assembles the iPhone. More than 630GB of confidential data was stolen by a ransomware group calling itself "World Leaks" and has been circulating online. The material was obtained illegally and MacRumors has not seen the stolen files directly. AppleInsider conducted an analysis of the stolen files and said it could confirm the authenticity of several key documents.

Among the information that has attracted particular is a bill of materials apparently related to the U.S. variant of the iPhone 18 Pro, which lists multiple Qualcomm components rather than Apple's C2 modem, codenamed Ganymede. The Qualcomm parts referenced include the SDX80M, SDR875, QDM8771, QDM8720, PMK75, PMX75, and QET7100A, components associated with mmWave 5G support. International iPhone 18 Pro models, by contrast, are said to use the "C2," which would succeed the C1 and C1X modems currently found in the iPhone Air, iPhone 17e, and M5 iPad Pro.

The implication, as AppleInsider notes, is that the C2 still lacks mmWave capability, and that Apple is once again relying on Qualcomm to fill that gap for American carriers.

mmWave is the ultra-high-frequency band of 5G offered primarily by Verizon, delivering very fast download speeds over short distances. Apple's C1 and C1X modems are widely regarded as more power efficient than their Qualcomm counterparts, meaning U.S. iPhone 18 Pro buyers may see somewhat worse battery life than those purchasing the same device elsewhere.

Daring Fireball's John Gruber offered analysis of the practical tradeoffs involved. While 5G outpaced LTE in his tests, Gruber argued the difference has no meaningful impact on how the phone actually feels to use:

Having a phone that can pull 320 Mbps down over cellular is like having a car that can go 320 MPH — an interesting technical feat, but of no practical value to me whatsoever. I never feel like I'm waiting for anything to load because I'm on LTE. LTE is fast enough, and regular 5G is more than fast enough. 5G mmWave is simply a waste of battery life as far as I'm concerned.

On why Apple would not simply deploy the C2 everywhere rather than retaining Qualcomm for the U.S. market, Gruber pointed the finger squarely at carrier economics:

Faster-than-you-practically-need download speeds are a carrier bragging point. Longer battery life and plenty-fast-enough download speeds are an Apple bragging point. Verizon — and to a lesser extent, AT&T — spent a fortune building out mmWave networks. They don't want to sell flagship phones that don't support them. Apple's flagship iPhones have supported those networks since 2020. If Zivkovic's analysis of this stolen data from Tata is correct, and Apple is going to use Qualcomm's modems only in iPhone 18 Pro models sold in the U.S., I think the reason why is Verizon and AT&T bragging points, not any practical user benefit. And the result may be that U.S. iPhone 18 Pro models get somewhat worse battery life than those in the rest of the world.

The C2 modem has been a rumored feature of the iPhone 18 Pro for years as part of Apple's broader effort to reduce its reliance on Qualcomm. A split deployment, with the C2 handling most of the world while Qualcomm covers the U.S., would represent a significant step in that direction even if it falls short of a complete transition.

The iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are expected to launch in the fall alongside the first foldable iPhone.

Article Link: iPhone 18 Pro Could Use Qualcomm Modem in the US and C2 Elsewhere
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Z-4195
I bought my iPhone 15 Pro from Canada to have a physical SIM slot and I have never noticed the lack of mmWave even though I use Verizon and am from NYC. I would rather have Apple's modem but oh well. Wasn't planning on upgrading this cycle anyways.

I am confident the 2027 iPhones will use C-series modems though. Apple's deal with Qualcomm expires in 2027 and I am confident that Apple plans on contesting royalty rates and probably starting litigation again. Last time Apple was forced to fold because of Qualcomm's "no license, no chips" rule and because Intel screwed up. This time Apple can hold out a lot longer since they don't need Qualcomm's modems.
 
Uhhhhhh wöt…
So no millimeter wave with C2…
Guess its gonna happen with C3 then! Unless Qualcomm has a patent for it…
 
We’ve seen this before, Apple kneecapping Qualcomm to meet the specs of the other modem. It’s a bit unfortunate Apple chose to stick with X80 rather than adopt X85.
Agreed. Though I’d still rather have a gimped X80 than the C2.

Back in the iPhone 7 generation, there was a clear cell-edge performance benefit to the Qualcomm baseband over the Intel baseband that’s now the underpinnings of the Apple basebands, even despite the features disabled in the QCA baseband.
 
Agreed. Though I’d still rather have a gimped X80 than the C2.

Back in the iPhone 7 generation, there was a clear cell-edge performance benefit to the Qualcomm baseband over the Intel baseband that’s now the underpinnings of the Apple basebands, even despite the features disabled in the QCA baseband.
While that was true back when they were Intel modems, in any recent tests I’ve read about, other than mmWave bands, the Apple modems performed as well as the Qualcomm ones.
 
Uhhhhhh wöt…
So no millimeter wave with C2…
Guess its gonna happen with C3 then! Unless Qualcomm has a patent for it…
If Qualcomm did it would be under FRAND. Same as all the old CDMA network tech, but that has been re-allocated .
 
mmWave 5G is such a dead end technology I kinda wish Apple wouldn’t support it in the States, as that would help hasten its end. But I get why they need to, as other phone manufacturers will absolutely point out how much slower the iPhone 18 Pro is compared to their phones, even if that comparison is only applicable in very, very rare conditions.
 
Last edited:
However, you wonder will the versions sold to T-Mobile USA customers use the C2 chip instead of the next Qualcomm radio modem chip. T-Mobile implemented their high-speed "UC" network mostly using former Sprint carrier frequencies, essentially mid-band high speed 5G per 3GPP NR specs for 5G.
 
... plus, apple's still going for the "C-3" system with gstar/amazon... that's when we'll see the C3 chip go mainline in a Pro phone (in another year or so).
 
We’ve seen this before, Apple kneecapping Qualcomm to meet the specs of the other modem. It’s a bit unfortunate Apple chose to stick with X80 rather than adopt X85.
Yep JPack we’ve been seeing this with Apple 🍎 for the last 4-5 years of Apple 🍎 not putting the Latest greatest Qualcomm modem in their flagship iPhone 📱 they obviously do this to save money 💰 was looking forward to seeing the C2 in real world action but guess we’ll have to wait for the C3 in the US 🇺🇸

With these memory prices rising, Apple 🍎 will do anything to save money and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Apple keep the same X80 modem in the 18 Pro’s to save some money 💵
 
However, you wonder will the versions sold to T-Mobile USA customers use the C2 chip instead of the next Qualcomm radio modem chip. T-Mobile implemented their high-speed "UC" network mostly using former Sprint carrier frequencies, essentially mid-band high speed 5G per 3GPP NR specs for 5G.
They could possibly do that if they are looking to save extra money 💵 especially with the ram memory prices making everything higher.

Apple did that before in the past where Verizon customers got the Qualcomm modem and all other carriers got the Intel modem.

This could be deja vu all over again as Apple
🍎 is looking at everything to cut costs because of the crazy high ram memory prices.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.