The two words I bolded in your post are very important.
To me, the iPhone's main attraction is saving me from pulling out my laptop and powering it on only to read a few emails and shut it down. I don't use Facebook. I don't come here unless I'm at work and have nothing better to do (which is entirely too often, but that's beside the point), and checking my Twitter feed usually gives me something to do when I get home from work just long enough to unwind before getting into bed.
I think the $30/mo is a fair deal for people who need to have data anytime/anywhere but I'm not one of those people and I'm sure there's plenty out there just like me. If/when AT&T decides to offer tiered data plans I'll consider paying for one of them. Until then, there's no way I'm paying just as much for my data as someone who has to constantly be reminded by AT&T that they're going over their 5GB "soft cap" for the month.
Edit: Forgot to address your app argument. I bought my iPod touch in January of 2008. Apps didn't exist.
But they exist now.
Everything is a matter of personal opinion. Of course it's 'to me', or 'to him', or 'to you'. If that is what you want to point out, then I guess my Ferrari analogy isn't so dumb after all.
The OP wants the best device available without having to pay for it. He wants to cripple it.
I guess that if the OP would have to pay full retail price for the iPhone ($599/699), and then not have to pay for a data plan, I wouldn't mind as much. Part of the $30/month data plan goes towards the subsidy of the iPhone.
People have different needs.![]()
This isn't a matter of need for the OP. All cellphone plans are not fully customizable, and I'm sure the OP knows this. It's a matter of the OP not wanting to pay what he has to for full functionality of an iPhone.
The