Contrary to yesterdays rumors, a new analyst report suggests that the iPhone 3GS will remain the low-end iPhone even after the iPhone 5 drops in September making it the first iPhone to spend over three years on the market.
In other words, we believe that the [existing] 3GS will be the low-end iPhone, BMO Capitals Keith Bachman writes Tuesday. Monday, Deutshe Banks Chris Whitmore told investors a low-end iPhone 4S that was unlocked and pre-paid could help Apple aggressively penetrate the mid range smart-phone market as RIM and Nokia are on life-support.
Bachmans comments appear to bring some sanity back into the discussion. As we intimated Monday, the idea of releasing the iPhone 4S as a $350 unlocked phone just didnt make sense when Apple is currently selling the unlocked iPhone 4 for nearly $700 each. Still, its interesting that the hardware price on the iPhone 4 has yet to come down enough to make it worth Apple selling at a lower price. You can probably thank the Retina Display for that.
via Cult of Mac - Link
---------------------------------
I actually believe this might be true because
1) iOS 5 doesn't completely suck on the 3GS
2) Rumors of a cheaper iPhone - sub $350 range. This is probably cheaper to make because no retina display and it's plastic.
3) This is "a low end" phone compared to what iPhone 5 will presumably be.
4) It uses a standard SIM, not microsim. Makes much more sense for "a low end cheap iPhone for the prepaid"
I honestly think that this is a good idea. It will still give carriers who offer the latest devices the upper hand, but it also allows those on Prepaid to get an iPhone.
Ideas?