Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,443
40,541



Research firm NPD today announced the release of its new Mobile Phone Track report for the second quarter of 2011, showing Android continuing to lead the U.S. smartphone market with 52% of new sales during the quarter. Apple's iPhone checked in with 29% of the market while Research in Motion's BlackBerry devices continued their free fall and garnered only 11% of the market.

iphone_3gs_4.jpg



SplatF pulls out one key detail from the full report, noting that not only is Apple's 14-month-old iPhone 4 continuing to lead the market in sales, but that the 8 GB iPhone 3GS takes the second spot in the rankings. The iPhone 3GS was introduced 26 months ago, and Apple kept the device around following last year's iPhone 4 introduction by dropping the capacity to 8 GB and offering it at a $99 price point for entry-level users. Pricing has since dropped to $49, with occasional deals bringing the price as low as free.
Here are the top five best-selling phones during Q2, via NPD's Mobile Phone Track service:

1. Apple iPhone 4
2. Apple iPhone 3GS
3. HTC EVO 4G
4. HTC Inspire 4G
5. Samsung INTENSITYII
Apple has attempted to keep sales momentum for the iPhone 4 moving forward with the introduction of a CDMA version on Verizon and the much-delayed launch of a white version of the device earlier this year. But even as Apple has diverged from its usual annual cycle of iPhone releases by pushing the iPhone 5 out to September or October this year, the iPhone 4 and even the iPhone 3GS continue to top the charts in U.S. sales.

Article Link: iPhone 4 and 3GS Rank as Best-Selling U.S. Smartphones
 
This should serve as a wakeup call to all the folks who claim Apple "needs to" or "must" include whatever their favorite piece of technology is. The fact that the 3GS outsells all those super-charged devices is amazing, yes, but not surprising when you examine people's actual needs and their decision making process.

The threads around here arguing over things like different types of screen technology are fun and all, but it just doesn't matter that much.
 
Staggering really. Old tech beating out on new... Must be hard for the others to stomach. And goes to show thatbpeople want the full package/walled garden ease and simplicity.
 
This should serve as a wakeup call to all the folks who claim Apple "needs to" or "must" include whatever their favorite piece of technology is. The fact that the 3GS outsells all those super-charged devices is amazing, yes, but not surprising when you examine people's actual needs and their decision making process.

The threads around here arguing over things like different types of screen technology are fun and all, but it just doesn't matter that much.

Well, Apple isn't going after the basement feature nerd market. ;)

Instead Apple customers knows that features =/= usability.
 
re original article

it was just meant to be

good work team aapl

now impress us with an awesome ip5
 
My wife and I purchased refurbished 3GS phones for $19 each right after Christmas thru AT&T. Not a scratch on them and have had zero problems with them.
 
Android continuing to lead the U.S. smartphone market with 52% of new sales during the quarter. Apple's iPhone checked in with 29% of the market

Android is not a smartphone, its an operating system. Show me an Android phone that is out selling the iphone. Tired of this inaccurate statement.
 
Doesn't surprise me really. Apple made a great product and truly innovated what we know as a smart phone today. Android is a great OS, but its being installed on phones that don't come close to the way iOS runs on an iPhone.
 
Im a little surprised the iPhone 3GS is selling THAT well. Are there specific numbers given?
 
Android is not a smartphone, its an operating system. Show me an Android phone that is out selling the iphone. Tired of this inaccurate statement.

+1. Plus anyone can twist the numbers to their advantage. Well maybe not HP with the TouchPad...

One ranking I'd be curious is the second-hand iPhone one. I know that a lot of people change with every version, so they might be selling their old ones.
 
This should serve as a wakeup call to all the folks who claim Apple "needs to" or "must" include whatever their favorite piece of technology is. The fact that the 3GS outsells all those super-charged devices is amazing, yes, but not surprising when you examine people's actual needs and their decision making process.

The threads around here arguing over things like different types of screen technology are fun and all, but it just doesn't matter that much.

well still only one source of iOS compared to everyone who wants the Android is split among multiple devices.
I will stand by the fact that I believe iPhone4 is massively over priced and 3GS is over priced as well.

If iPhone4 was any thing other than the iPhone at this point it would be $99 on contract at most but chances are it would be at the $50 price point and the 3GS would be free.
People are paying way to much.
 
Last edited:
Im a little surprised the iPhone 3GS is selling THAT well. Are there specific numbers given?

I'm not. I think most phone buyers buy what's cheap or offered to them. So when the average consumer goes into AT&T and they say iPhone for $50 that's all they hear and go for it.

In talking to my circle of friends, if they are techie by nature, they picked the phone then went and got it. But if they are just another consumer, they just bought what was sold to them. Everyone I've met that bought an Android based phone because it was Android bought it because they have some chip on their shoulder for Apple. Mostly the old hard core Windows crowed that just hates seeing Apple so successful.
 
well still only one source of iOS compared to everyone who wants the Android is split among multiple devices.

Which is why it's so impressive.

I will stand by the fact that I believe iPhone4 is massively over priced and 3GS is over priced as well.

You can stand by it and still be wrong.

Apple charges what the market will bear and what consumers are willing to pay.
If iPhone4 was any thing other than the iPhone at this point it would be $99 on contract at most but chances are it would be at the $50 price point and the 3GS would be free.
People are paying

But the iPhone 4 is the iPhone - with everything it offers and represents. It can't be anything other than that.

If you don't have an iPhone . . . you don't have an iPhone. We're seeing just how true that is.
 
Android is not a smartphone, its an operating system. Show me an Android phone that is out selling the iphone. Tired of this inaccurate statement.

Just like the iPhone isn't just an iPhone, e.g. iPhone 4 and the 3GS.

The article goes into you point and breaks it down, it is all there in the original article.
 
well still only one source of iOS compared to everyone who wants the Android is split among multiple devices.
I will stand by the fact that I believe iPhone4 is massively over priced and 3GS is over priced as well.

If iPhone4 was any thing other than the iPhone at this point it would be $99 on contract at most but chances are it would be at the $50 price point and the 3GS would be free.
People are paying

The iPhone 4 is overpriced compared to the competition? Ive used Android phones a few times and they just dont work as well. The software seems cheap and the animations are jerky even though they shove all that hardware in there. How is the iPhone 4 overpriced compared to the competition which is the only way you can call something overpriced?
 
Doesn't surprise me really. Apple made a great product and truly innovated what we know as a smart phone today. Android is a great OS, but its being installed on phones that don't come close to the way iOS runs on an iPhone.

Android is not a great OS. It frequently needs a reboot to restore functions like email. The interface has a problem with loading buttons and allowing them to be pressed/activated before refreshing what is written on the buttons. So you click the wrong thing, call the wrong person. It calls on its own, texts on its own. It sucks the battery down at crazy rates even with nearly every syncing and other data accessing feature turned off. It gets stuck in email loops racking up gigs of data usage. It's just not a pleasant experience. It's the Windows Vista of the smartphone OS's.
 
The fact that the 3GS outsells all those super-charged devices is amazing, yes, but not surprising when you examine people's actual needs and their decision making process.

Plus, as people often comment about other phones, the low 3GS price is a factor.

The customer doesn't even have to sign up for two contracts, like with BOGO phones (which is effectively just 1/2 price for both).
 
This should serve as a wakeup call to all the folks who claim Apple "needs to" or "must" include whatever their favorite piece of technology is. The fact that the 3GS outsells all those super-charged devices is amazing, yes, but not surprising when you examine people's actual needs and their decision making process.

The threads around here arguing over things like different types of screen technology are fun and all, but it just doesn't matter that much.

The consumer market has always been consumer-driven, not tech-head-driven. Those tech-head jackasses are always claiming that consumers need this and that and they're not even close. Most consumers are happy to use the same devices for years as long as it works well for them. I would never want to run a business to keep tech-heads happy. They always want the latest crap no matter how problematic it might be or how high the costs are.

Tech-heads are always upset that the iPhone doesn't have the latest stuff. Apple's iPhone can't compete against Android smartphones that come out every few weeks using the most recent tech. The production volume is completely different for Apple. They need to plan for tens of millions of iPhones, not tens of thousands like most of these Android smartphone production runs use.

Consumers' average needs are most important in designing a product, not cutting-edge tech. Consumers need an overall well-working product more than some flashy but flaky device. Tech-heads probably comprise about 1% of the consumer population and hardly matter at all when it comes to sales.

Tech-heads are just too g-damn picky for consumer business needs. :mad:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.