I didn't post the wrong link, I meant for it to be the link for the apple patent.
I didn't post the wrong link, I meant for it to be the link for the apple patent.
The bottom seams could also be grappling points for some kind of clip-on accessory. It may be for a car mount (perhaps, for one rumored to be built-in on some future cars).
The bottom seams could also be grappling points for some kind of clip-on accessory. It may be for a car mount (perhaps, for one rumored to be built-in on some future cars).
WHAT IF - they are for LED visual notification of some sort? Like the slit in the front of the MacBooks.
read it again.
"The Earth's surface and the clouds absorb visible and invisible radiation from the sun and re-emit much of the energy as infrared back to the atmosphere."
in other words, it isn't a source of infrared light, it reflects sun light. woop dee doo.
infrared is heat.. the IR emitted by the moon is not reflected sun IR but rather the consequence of the sun slightly heating the moon, then this energy is released in the form of IR radiation.
humans emit IR radiation, but using your argument you could argue it's the sun's IR since the plants absorb the IR, then another animal eats the plant and consequently metabolises the plant generating heat then comes a human, eats the animal, metabolises it, generates energy, that is released in the form of IR radiation.
My point is.. the stellar objects aren't simply mirrors of the suns' IR radiation. This radiation is partly reflected, yes, hence the whiteness of the moon. But part is absorbed and re-emited later in the form of heat (=IR radiation).
Reflection and re-emission aren't the same thing.
read it again.
"The Earth's surface and the clouds absorb visible and invisible radiation from the sun and re-emit much of the energy as infrared back to the atmosphere."
in other words, it isn't a source of infrared light, it reflects sun light. woop dee doo.
Since infrared radiation is emitted by all objects based on their temperatures, according to the black body radiation law, thermography makes it possible to "see" one's environment with or without visible illumination. The amount of radiation emitted by an object increases with temperature, therefore thermography allows one to see variations in temperature (hence the name).
without getting in to the dispute between infrared/ultraviolet and whatnot it would seem far more sensible (if they are sensors) if they are simply touch sensors working off the electrostatic charge in our skin, therefore zero light is needed.
You're reaching. There's no chance of this.
+1.
I didn't read all the posts in this thread, but has it occurred to anyone that the seams make the sides of the phone clickable, like the sides of the previous Mighty Mouse?
You'd have to have some finger strength to click a quarter-inch aluminum frame.
That, and since clicking it would presumably give some tactile response, I'm pretty sure the folks at Gizmodo would have noticed it, even on a bricked prototype.
That's coming in article 32 scheduled to be released 2 weeks from now.![]()
The seams have been bothering me a lot, but not so much if they have a special purpose.