Liquipel's Watersafe technology provides protection against 80% of all liquid damage scenarios without the use of a case. .
80% is not good enough. How would Apple prove you exceeded the 80% to keep it's liability under control. I think they will leave it as it is and maybe improve the moisture sensors.
There is too much money to be made on replacements and comprehensive warranties to add this feature...
The technology exists to make the next iPhone waterproof. Anyone else think this may be a possibility for tomorrow?
(Of course this is Apple, and they love to blame faults with iDevices on water, when they have never been in contact with water. I still want my iPod touch repaired Tim!)
Better then 0%... is your iphone screen 100% shatter resistant... Does everyone throw their iphone on the ground because apple says the glass is stronger.
Does apple release software without bugs?
do heart valves fail..
do condoms break...
Nothing is 100%
Apple maps was not 80% finished on release.. still isn't
Food for thought.
Food for thought is that Apple is not going to tell you your phone will tollerate water 80% of the time. Period.
what apple need to do is rugged phone, will be more useful than simple water proof, imagine the application or rugged iphone in the field, and i mean real field,?
Welcome to the forums; we're glad you're here. That being said, when looking at related threads or searching for threads, do take notice of the DATE of the thread before replying. This thread was last active September 10, 2013 and is concerning the iPhone 5(S).what apple need to do is rugged phone, will be more useful than simple water proof, imagine the application or rugged iphone in the field, and i mean real field,?
what apple need to do is rugged phone, will be more useful than simple water proof, imagine the application or rugged iphone in the field, and i mean real field,?
And as is the case with the Apple Watch, and apparently the iPhone 6S's, even if they are more "resistant," I don't see Apple touting this. It would open the door for too much liability.No way Apple could make it's phone waterproof and rugged without changing what it looks like. I think Apple will leave that up to the case makers and there are some crazy durable cases out there, problem is they are big and bulky. So unless you need such protection, it is not worth changing the iPhone for all.
And as is the case with the Apple Watch, and apparently the iPhone 6S's, even if they are more "resistant," I don't see Apple touting this. It would open the door for too much liability.
..and obviously aesthetics are one of Apple's top priorities, so function over form rarely, if ever, happens.Just imagine what the iPhone would look like if it was just made to rugged specs. It would change for sure.