To be even more fair (and even more accurate)
I think you will find the iOS Crowd have generally dismissed anything that Apple does not have, until they have it.
Remember no one wants a larger than 4" phone, and last year Apple even did a video showing you how 4" was the perfect size.
Just like now the Microsoft surface, a full OS on a tablet is a stupid idea.
Until Apple do it
Ditto with the Ipad Mini. I've ran into quite a few people in person, as well as many saying online how the Iphone screen is too small for reading (back when 4" was all they had to work with), but the Ipad is just too big to carry around. For all of those folks, you had others who said they're crazy... Iphone 4" is the perfect size, the Ipad's also great! Just carry both if you need a balance of the 2! When the Ipad Mini came out, one person I ran into said it was an instant buy. She wished it had Retina (which was the correct thing to do on Apple's part, leaving it for the IpadM2, to make more $$ that way), but this works well for reading, and she can fit it into her pocket book which is of the more "girly-sized" variety (I guess unlike mothers who have those oversized ones to put a diaper in, snacks, gameboys, etc.).
AFAIK, some of the tech rumors were what are now the Ip6 and Iph6p would've cannibalized sales of the Ipad Mini, which was why it came out that much later. I agree with the counterarguments that the Ipad Mini was the worst bang for the buck. If you can afford to pay just $100 or so more, and can deal with the larger size, then an Ipad's certainly the way to go.
And then I recall comments on Cnet how the Iph5s is the perfect size to read emails and browse the web. If he needs something bigger, he'll just use his Ipad for games, and heavier internet use

So this statement here says 1) there IS indeed an interest for larger phones, and 2) folks would like to avoid having to carry around 2 devices with them, as they'd like to do gaming with the appropriate sized screen without the Ipad.
Needs and tastes change over the time.
And a 2012 choice (4" display) could be changed in 2014. I can't see anything wrong in that, and Apple sales are the demonstration they are doing just right.
They do. I'm not necessarily criticizing Apple for changing. The point was directed at roughly half of the iOS fans who kept parroting that a 4" display was perfect because you can use it one-handed (in portrait mode, but otherwise true). In the meantime, you had a growing # of iOS users who were clamoring for larger screens. I've met some in person, as well as heard of many online that switched to Android because there wasn't a phone with a 4.5" to 5.5" display otherwise.
So, you are saying that if Apple had stuck to a 4" phone, no one would of bought it, as their tastes had changed?
Or are you saying Apple makes something new, then, upon seeing this, Apple folks tastes then change?
Well, that's sort of been the tradeoff with iOS... they don't have a vast selection of products. Much better for developers and those who don't like to wade through dozens and dozens of products. OTOH, there isn't much choice either. My observations were those who liked the 4" screen of course got that. Some of the 4" naysayers either sucked it up and got it because they wanted to stay with the Apple ecosystem, waited for as long as possible for a new, larger Iphone, or switched to Android.
So, At the moment, the concept of the Surface Pro. A tablet running a full OS is being criticised on these forums as being the wrong thing do do,
When Apple release their tablet, with a full OS, then instantly Apple fans tastes will change, and then such a device will be deemed correct?
I'm not even sure if the SP1 came out before the Ipad1. If it did, and it was a flop, then I'm giving pts to Apple not for being first, but doing it "correctly", or at least in a way that's more usable than whatever the SP1 turned out to be.