Fair enough. I missed that post. But anyway, was just pointing out there is a lot of unnecessary negativity here. I personally don't feel the op was running around like the sky is falling. $1000 is a lot of money to have a phone you're unhappy with.No, I said about 10 posts prior that if it's crashing constantly, he should take it back. But it likely has nothing to do with the storage memory type, and no cause for running around crying about the sky falling.
C
Shame on you Apple charging us loads of money for TLC tat!! Phone will now be sent back for a full refund!
I urge you guys to check yours.
Fair enough. I missed that post. But anyway, was just pointing out there is a lot of unnecessary negativity here. I personally don't feel the op was running around like the sky is falling. $1000 is a lot of money to have a phone you're unhappy with.
I read it, and to me it looked like the OP had already self diagnosed his devices own problem and only posted to complain about some TLC VS MLC band flash. Also, the OP states that the iPhone is being returned to Apple..... This is just another complaint to go along with the list of others on here which to me seem like half of them are useless given that Apple will replace any iPhone with warranty issues.... I for one refuse to check my iPhone for non issues like this one or the silly chip thingy, lol.Am I the only ine that isn't glossing over the fact that the OP's phone crashed? Seems
To have crashed at least once, but perhaps
Multiple times (this is unclear to me based on subsequent replies).
This is the danger of the Internet. You come on here trying to figure out what might be the issue and you end up finding some things out that may or may not be relevant. In this case mlc versus tlc.
In any case, we can all be a little more accepting and tolerant. The post certainly doesn't read to me "I'm returning this because I ran a diagnostic and found out my hardware was different from what I prefer". Sounds like said diagnostic wouldn't even have been run had there been. I issues to begin with.
I think part of the problem that people have here is that one thread like this gets started and the next thing you know someone adds a gate to the end of it, and then 20 more threads come to follow on the same subject. As someone stated earlier in here, most people don't even know what TLC is let alone how to check for it. Or should I say "if they cared to check for it".Fair enough. I missed that post. But anyway, was just pointing out there is a lot of unnecessary negativity here. I personally don't feel the op was running around like the sky is falling. $1000 is a lot of money to have a phone you're unhappy with.
I think part of the problem that people have here is that one thread like this gets started and the next thing you know someone adds a gate to the end of it, and then 20 more threads come to follow on the same subject. As someone stated earlier in here, most people don't even know what TLC is let alone how to check for it. Or should I say "if they cared to check for it".![]()
I understand the problem. What I don't understand is the berating. "I have a problem with you or what you said so I'm going to continue to berate you and come back for more." Doesn't make sense to me, but it obviously does to many in this threadI think part of the problem that people have here is that one thread like this gets started and the next thing you know someone adds a gate to the end of it, and then 20 more threads come to follow on the same subject. As someone stated earlier in here, most people don't even know what TLC is let alone how to check for it. Or should I say "if they cared to check for it".![]()
So, you come back 7 days after this thread was done to post this.I understand the problem. What I don't understand is the berating. "I have a problem with you or what you said so I'm going to continue to berate you and come back for more." Doesn't make sense to me, but it obviously does to many in this thread
Either way, it's done now. And I probably shouldn't have posted myself lol.
It was a response to your since you responded to mine. And I did mention, yes, it was probably wasted breath.So, you come back 7 days after this thread was done to post this.Btw, I don't even know why you picked my post to quote when it didn't berate anyone as I simply stated a fact.. Perhaps you are just having a bad day and needed someone to vent to.
Hope your day gets better.
![]()
Perhaps because there were some things linking it to issues when it came to some iPhone 6 and 6 Plus models?The top consumer SSDs use TLC (Samsung 840 EVO and 850 EVO), and the industry has been moving to TLC for a while.
The storage on the iPhone 6S (with TLC) absolutely destroys older devices that just happen to be using MLC in benchmarks.
I think it's funny that people are concerned about TLC flash in their device. With years of testing and with what Apple and Samsung have shown it to be capable of, why still doubt it?
I wouldn't. The dust still hasn't settled around the malware coming out of China and it's prudent to avoid installing anything that's not from the App Store (and some Chinese malware even made it to the official App Store, giving you an idea how messed up things have been). Unless others on this forum are familiar with this developer and can vouch for it, I would steer clear. And I honestly can't see why anyone would try to identify the maker of their flash unless they are having crashes. And even then, I'd leave it to Apple to sort out. Within the return period, I'd get a new iPhone. Outside of it, I'd insist politely on warranty service.
The top consumer SSDs use TLC (Samsung 840 EVO and 850 EVO), and the industry has been moving to TLC for a while.
The storage on the iPhone 6S (with TLC) absolutely destroys older devices that just happen to be using MLC in benchmarks.
I think it's funny that people are concerned about TLC flash in their device. With years of testing and with what Apple and Samsung have shown it to be capable of, why still doubt it?