Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
FWIW I suspect the ANMR317 chip is some sort of RF chain companion chip. No comparable that I can find.

On the backside of this board likely resides the WTR3925. It replaces the WTR1625L and WFR1620 seen in the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6S. It is the 28nm RF component I was referring to. It's good news because it saves board space and should be lower power. (9635M is also 20nm rather than 28nm in 9625M)

Relevant anandtech passage:
As part of the announcement there's also a new transceiver, WTR3925 which is Qualcomm's first single-chip carrier aggregation solution, confirming my suspicions that WTR1625L and WFR1620 were both required to achieve aggregation with the MDM9x25 solution. In addition WTR3925 is built on a 28nm RF CMOS process, a significant jump from the current 65nm RF CMOS process used in WTR1605 and WTR1625L.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7531/qualcomm-announces-fourth-gen-cat-6-lte-modem-mdm9x35
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: m.level
Does anyone outside U.S. have unlimited data plans anyway to find benefit in this? I blow through 5 GB data per week according to my local Sprint guy. I really don't pay much attention with my unlimited data.
Heck, does anyone inside the U.S. have carriers that even support this speed if they have unlimited data plans?

I am not getting this. You are not the first post to raise the point "useless without unlimited data plan." If I have 5 gig, then, um, I have 5 gig. What does the speed have to do with capacity? At least in my case, my usage habit is not affected by speed, it's affected by availability.

I currently have 15 gig plan to support the entire family. We never exceed our capacity. Why will a faster chip, all of a sudden, require an unlimited plan?
 
I don't know... I'd probably say the 5S was the least impressive S model. Both 3GS and 4S sported a vastily improved SoC more so than 5 > 5S iirc the 4S camera was quite a bit better, was the first dual core and had SIRI. 5S had touch ID, but everything else was kind of incremental.

Processor speed increases are almost always meaningless in the iOS ecosystem, where virtually every app developer is required to support legacy hardware 2-3 generations back in order to be profitable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ParanoidDroid
I am not getting this. You are not the first post to raise the point "useless without unlimited data plan." If I have 5 gig, then, um, I have 5 gig. What does the speed have to do with capacity? At least in my case, my usage habit is not affected by speed, it's affected by availability.

I currently have 15 gig plan to support the entire family. We never exceed our capacity. Why will a faster chip, all of a sudden, require an unlimited plan?

It might, it might not all depends on the user.

Just as an example to see their side of the argument... If I have to spend 30mins on the bus and plan on using my phone, I will use more data in those 30 mins because things load faster and there is less waiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoulderAdonis
Ok, I'll bite, what does one do on a phone that requires a transfer rate of 300mbps?
Anything that you could do on a desktop as the iPhone can be used as a hotspot, for one.

More on point though: I used my iPhone to control a remote desktop. That requires quite a lot of bandwidth.
 
It might, it might not all depends on the user.

Just as an example to see their side of the argument... If I have to spend 30mins on the bus and plan on using my phone, I will use more data in those 30 mins because things load faster and there is less waiting.

I don't follow how this is true. Usually the action that takes time is actually consuming the content, not waiting for it to loan. Whether it loads at 50Mbps or 300Mbps, a 15 minute podcast will still take 15 minutes to listen to; a 3 minute song will still take 3 minutes to listen to; a 2000-word New York Times article will still be 2000-words; etc.

The only media I can think of that usually loads slower than I can consume are small pictures - like Instagram. Other than that, I don't see how more speed means more used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMountainLife
It might, it might not all depends on the user.

Just as an example to see their side of the argument... If I have to spend 30mins on the bus and plan on using my phone, I will use more data in those 30 mins because things load faster and there is less waiting.

Fair point. I do take the bus to work, but I am usually reading and answering work related emails, so my data usage will not change regardless of the load speed, since the thinking and writing is the bulk of the time. If you are streaming music, you cannot hear music any faster, so again don't see it altering data consumption. However, if they are flipping mindlessly through FB or Twitter, then your point is valid. Maybe in a picture intensive app like flickr or Snapchat, where you could flip through photos faster. Not my use case, but I get there are those out there that have this use case.
 
Some video streaming services would adjust their quality depending
I don't follow how this is true. Usually the action that takes time is actually consuming the content, not waiting for it to loan. Whether it loads at 50Mbps or 300Mbps, a 15 minute podcast will still take 15 minutes to listen to; a 3 minute song will still take 3 minutes to listen to; a 2000-word New York Times article will still be 2000-words; etc.

The only media I can think of that usually loads slower than I can consume are small pictures - like Instagram. Other than that, I don't see how more speed means more used.

Some live streaming services, such as twitch, adjust the video quality according to the user's bandwidth. But then again, you can manually switch to a lower setting if you have limited data.
 
Some video streaming services would adjust their quality depending


Some live streaming services like twitch adjust the video quality according to the user's bandwidth. But then again, you can manually switch to a lower setting if you have limited data.

A faster modem means your device is transmitting less time, which improves power usage a lot. That's where the main advantage of faster speed for most people : battery lasts longer.

Its the same thing with a faster processor. Most people don't need the power per say, but the fact the processor needs to work less and less time to get the job done (even if the difference for the user cannot be measured as it is already responsive) means its using less power : also called "race to idle". For most people, their A8/A9 will be active a very small portion of the time.
 
Sounds like the main features will be: Force touch and much improved camera. Everything like processor speed, RAM, LTE speeds will be improved, which is great - all little things which add up to a great experience.

If we get Force Touch, decent Camera, decent Ram, and faster processor/LTE speed...these are, yeah these are little things but they add up to a good enough update that I will buy.

As long as the entry iPhone is 32GB and they have other colors.
 
I don't follow how this is true. Usually the action that takes time is actually consuming the content, not waiting for it to loan. Whether it loads at 50Mbps or 300Mbps, a 15 minute podcast will still take 15 minutes to listen to; a 3 minute song will still take 3 minutes to listen to; a 2000-word New York Times article will still be 2000-words; etc.

The only media I can think of that usually loads slower than I can consume are small pictures - like Instagram. Other than that, I don't see how more speed means more used.

More speed = less buffering, faster loading. So that Netflix stream might buffer a few mins faster, likewise with the podcast.

A 2000 word article will load a few seconds faster, as you browse through articles you will buy your self another minute or so to browse more articles.

Im not saying that usage difference is big but there is valid reasoning behind it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Apple being Apple, Samsung had this chip inside the Galaxy Alpha and S5 LTE-A last year, at the same time the i6 was introduced, here we can see that Apple really hold innovation for the next year. insted of using it at the i6 (maybe it would have a less dissapointing battery life bacause it's a more efficient chip, 20 nm) they decided to use the 9X25 with it's archaic and power hungry 28 nm process. http://www.fudzilla.com/35923-qualcomm-20nm-9x35-gobi-cat-6-modem-in-phones
 
  • Like
Reactions: m.level
For everyday users, this gives the potential for significant increases in LTE network performance with download speeds of up to 300 Mbps, twice that of the current iPhone line. Real-world limitations of carrier support will, however, limit those speed improvements in many cases.

All the faster that ATT gets to throttle you to worse-than-dial-up speeds.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.