USB 3.1c is more standard than having a lightning set of headphones. I don't see how USB 3.1c will become redundant over lightning since USB 3.1c is capable of so much more. Heck even the iPhone nows still uses usb 2, and look how long thats been around.
Also having the ability to have cross over capability would be a good point for both parties, as you general hear more people switching to mac, than to PC, so i wouldn't see that harming apple at all. Imagine that you have your usb c headphones from your PC or Android device, and now want to enter into the Apple ecosystem... you now have to buy another set of headphones.....This doesn't seem like a good way to win new customers over. So the benefit that it will last even longer than the lightning port since its capable or more and potential attract more customers from other plateforms.
Having one standard port that can do everything to me seems a lot simpler and easier for all consumers. There is no need to worry about whether your new device is compatible with your apple laptop/phone.
There is a standard port today, it's called Bluetooth. These days, I can't even remember the last time I plugged headphones into my iPhone.
And does these wireless headphones offer the same quality as wired headphones?
I don't really see how adding bluetooth buds solves this problem...I really think Apple is prematurely doing away with the headphone jack. But it Inshallah something that I just have to make myself accept if I want to get an iPhone 7.
But if apple wants this to work they need to package iPhone 7 with Bluetooth ear phones and not lightening connection. It's like going back to the early 2000s where phone manufacturers like Nokia used a non standard headphone port. That was a huge hassle which is why Nokia winded up adding a standard 3.5mm headphone jack like everyone else.
Your points are wrong. Macs do not have a proprietary connector. Firewire and thunderbolt (Apple did help with development) are not Apple technologies. They did not replace the floppy and the DVD drive with something proprietary. The only proprietary connectors that Apple introduced are the 30-pin and the the lightning connectors.
Other OEMs will never ditch the analog port -- there is no reason for them to do so. Your core argument is based on fantasy and little electrical signals in your brain which only you believe are the truth.
Battery life concerns, what a surprise. So Apple is switching to wireless audio but it's not ready yet... This will be a desaster, trust me.According to 9to5Mac, while the earphones are currently under development in preparation for a fall launch, there's a possibility the technology could be delayed due to battery life concerns. The earphones are said to have a battery life under four hours.
Good enough for me! The real win for me is not having to deal with that wire!
The wheel was invented thousands of years ago, lets retire that already.Isn’t it amazing how much people are bitching about retiring quite literally 100 year old technology.
If this turns out to be the case it's the first decision that's made me think I could look at Android phones.
There are water resistant phones with 3.5 mm jack out there. Water resistance is NO reason for dropping the jack, this is just a myth.A lightning to 3.5 mm adapter is all that would be needed. I would gladly give up the 3.5 mm jack for a water resistant phone.
Interesting development, but 4 hours definitely are a no go.
If that's true, Apple should delay the launch until the technology is more mature.
if it ain't broke ...
i think Apple will surprise us with their solution.
First,
24 bit hi-res audio
Second, new 24 bit DAC
Third, the hi-res audio over bluetooth. Because its hi res, it will be of better quality than any wired conventional 16bit could be.
This is a separate argument, but it's been demonstrated many times over in various threads here that 24 bit, at the consumer end, does not offer higher audio quality. At the studio level it offers greater headroom, which is useful. Also, I don't know enough about the technical side of Bluetooth to say this definitively, but I was under the impression that Bluetooth, in its current form, does not even have the throughput to deliver 16-bit lossless. How therefore 24 bit lossless will be delivered (lossless being what it would need to be to be able to arguably be better than wired) is a mystery to me.
And does these wireless headphones offer the same quality as wired headphones?
No. Android and Samsung are having the exact same dilemma as Apple. They are running out of space inside their devices to add new features and increase battery life. I would bet that's why Samsung makes so me of the biggest "phablets" on the planet. But they don't have the balls to remove a redundant standard like the 3.5mm jack even though it would help push the industry toward wireless.
So when Apple takes the plunge, a year later you'll see them doing the same thing, albeit they will use mini USB, not Lightning. But the result will be the same.