iPhone 8 Shows Modest Improvements in Cellular Network Bandwidth Tests

It’s both impressive and disappointing.

Until I remember the real world impact of the missing antennas is essentially nothing. Then it’s just impressive mobile phones reach these speeds.

 

And yet isn't 4G LTE at LEAST 100Mbps for a limit? Companies keep pushing all these "Gs" with money vs actual speeds.

 

i don't really think that 4x4 mimo is the thing we need. i'd rather have continuous coverage with moderate speed than some theoretical blazing high speed - yet only achievable in lab environment. i see no stuff around that could not be enjoyed with just 10-20Mbps...

 

I've already seen the difference. My job has me going to rural areas and my unlocked Qualcomm 8+ consistently outperforms my wife's Intel equipped ATT 8+ purchased through the NEXT plan. My phone usually has an extra bar or so and holds onto LTE, while my wife's phone drops into 4G mode and is much slower to regain LTE. When we're in the city the difference isn't as pronounced.

 

Bollocks, the international model is still intel

 

In other news, Intel still makes an inferior modem compared to Qualcomm.

 

THe incresed signal is nice, but the speeds are total overkill. Netflix or youtube 4k resolution takes less than 25mbs.

On a desktop computer I would understand in some very specific situations that you would want more than 100-200mbs, but in a phone? 880mbs is a total overkill for the next 5 (if not 10) years at least.

There are pretty much no servers of public services that send anywere near those speeds

 

How do i tell if i have an intel or Qualcomm chip?

 

long story short:

In an apocalypse, if you need to call for help , evolution might sort out the iPhone users by 18 seconds while galaxy users are 18 seconds ahead.

turning point :

if the person whom you are calling has an iPhone and was in a dead zone , your galaxy won't help

 

Literally in the article you are posting about:

4x4 MIMO also helps with keeping and regaining connectivity to the cellular network. Not just higher speeds.

 

If you bought your phone direct from AT&T or T-Mobile or if you bought the phone from Apple or another retailer specifically for use with an AT&T or T-Mobile account, you almost certainly have an iPhone 7 or iPhone 8 with the Intel modem. If you bought the phone for use on a Verizon or Sprint account or if you bought the "SIM-free" iPhone 7 or 8 from Apple in the U.S., you should have a phone with the Qualcomm modem.

 

I got my phone on the Apple Upgrade Program, and yes its for ATT so probably Intel, though i thought all phones on the AUP were unlocked, since I am not doing a contract.

 

Ahh wow didn't realize the 4x4 MIMO helped with recovering from dead zones. That's my biggest annoyance with riding the subway....

 

uncontrolled data is uncontrolled. May as well start reporting Survey Monkey findings as well.

 

Can you choose which one you get? Sounds similar to the chip lottery to me.

 

Unlocked vs. locked is not really what is the issue. Only the Qualcomm has CDMA capability, so if you are on Verizon or Sprint and have to fall back to 3G due to LTE coverage issues. So the US "unlocked" no carrier phones are that version as you might use them on those networks. If you buy the T-Mobile or AT&T phone they can still be unlocked, but since you specified a non-CDMA fallback carrier you get a non-CDMA capable phone.

While the Qualcomm modems are still working better than the Intel, Apple wants to sell less of them due to their spat with Qualcomm. Thus whenever possible they sell the Intel versions.

 

Not only does the 4x4 MIMO help with regaining signal faster from dead zones and better reception overall, faster speeds mean the LTE modem can go into standby faster thereby saving battery life.

 

Of course you can, ALL unlocked "sim-free" 8's have qualcomm as Intel modem doesn't support CDMA and is incompatible with Sprint/Verizon. All Sprint/Verizon phones have qualcomm, while all ATT/TMO specific models bought directly from them or Apple through NEXT or IUP are all Intel phones. If your iphone model supports CDMA, it's qualcomm.

A possible loophole is Best Buy. Supposedly all their iphones they sell are CDMA capable as they only lock them to the carrier in the store to reduce their inventory.

 

Buying a phone via the AUP to use with your AT&T account is not the same thing as buying a SIM-free phone from Apple, as far as I know. Yes, both phones are unlocked; but if you buy the SIM-free phone from Apple in the U.S., you are guaranteed to get a phone that works on every carrier that supports the iPhone in the U.S. That's only possible for phones that have Qualcomm modems in them.

If you buy an iPhone 7 or 8 via AUP to use on AT&T, they're going to give you an unlocked phone with an Intel modem that works on AT&T, T-Mobile, and other non-CDMA networks as far as I know.

 

Since I'm on AT&T, I don't really care because their speeds are garbage. One of these days, I really need to change networks.

 

I’ve been using my Intel iPhone 7 on AT&T’s network for over a year. No complaints whatsoever. I think that issue was incredibly overblown last year and many people continue to make a mountain out of a molehill. Unless you want the option of switching to Sprint or Verizon, I really don’t think it makes a difference. Maybe I just don’t know what I’m missing by not having the Qualcomm model - whatever.

 

Probably a slightly better battery life on the QCA models especially in low signal areas, but not something day and night difference. I went for sim free last year, so my 7+ was QCA. If I were to buy a new phone I’d probably get the QCA version just because I’m OCD lol.

 

If you read the rest of the article, you'll notice that the lack of 4x4 MIMO is likely the reason why the iPhone 8 falls short in coverage tests as well.

MIMO isn't all about speeds, it's also about signal reliability and usability.