Wireless has very real limits—mostly for safety reasons. You're talking about a non-negligible amount of ERP around people. It's one thing to talk about transmitting a few milliwatts next to your head. It's quite another when you're talking about high single-digit watts. That makes the old analog cell phones look like toys by comparison.... You want to talk about cancer fears... at those power levels, they'll actually be legitimate causes for concern.
Yep. I get the benefit of just setting down your phone and having it charge, but when traveling, you have to carry not only the wall socket plug, but the cord and charging pad, which frankly is more than you do with a cord and wall socket plug today. This is why Apple hasn't embraced the tech - because it's not really a leap ahead, like wireless / padless charging will be. That will be the game changer, the next wifi-like advancement as it will have the ability to change how we live with our devices, moving to an even more wireless life.
Really? LiquidMetal is 100% RF transparent? Id like to know what LiquidMetal consists of.That's why they've been developing a way to mass produce LiquidMetal for about 5 years now. It's stronger than steel from an impact standpoint, and it's 100% RF transparent.
There are a LOT of OTA TV and radio stations at 50,000 watts of power being broadcast. Even in crowded markets there are lots of 10-30,000 watt stations. In addition, many communication companies still use microwave towers that broadcast in a more focused 30 watt range, and there can be a lot of those in cities. Then there are the satellite cable companies that beam microwave signals down from their satellites to receiver dishes mounted on houses. Most national networks have much bigger systems to transmit and receive, also by satellite relay. Then their is GPS satellites also beaming signals. I don't think a 5-10 watt local signal, even a hell of a lot of them, is going to add much to this.
Re-read the article it does say that Apple DOES know about current wireless charging that's why the rumour is they WANT to go all glass. Apparently there are issues with current metal cases and wireless charging whereas glass casings allow devices to charge faster.Maybe Apple could ask everyone else how they can charge wirelessly without a glass case.
Hell, even the Palm Pre announced in 2010 had wireless charging, yet it wasn't doomed to destruction following a slip from the hand.
Anyway, it is just a rumour...
Dear cables,I'm calling it: No ports, no buttons. Nuthin' but glass.
I'm a little leery of this idea of wireless charging over the air like wifi. Could that possibly be healthy to be near? Sounds like it would be a pocket of cancerous radiation to be near something like that.
Wireless has very real limits—mostly for safety reasons. You're talking about a non-negligible amount of ERP around people. It's one thing to talk about transmitting a few milliwatts next to your head. It's quite another when you're talking about high single-digit watts. That makes the old analog cell phones look like toys by comparison.... You want to talk about cancer fears... at those power levels, they'll actually be legitimate causes for concern.
I don't think I have ever once used an emoji. Ever.
Nope, it's the truth. In fact not only do I not use them but I think they are childish and tacky.
RF radiation cannot and will not cause cancer. No matter how many hundreds of watts you get exposed to. That much RF can cause burns through the excitation of water molecules in our bodies, but its on the wrong end of the spectrum to cause the kind of damage needed to cause cancer.
I cannot tell you how tired I am of people thinking radio waves can cause cancer. 6th grade science will teach you that its fundamentally impossible.
Since I'm so nice, heres a handy chart to illustrate:
![]()
Ionizing = Cancer causing, non-ionizing = no cancer
Now tell me where radio and cell phones end up.
Just to confirm apple do U turn, hoping they will U turn on the soldering of SSD on 2016 rMBP
From 2012
Phil Schiller on "Wireless charging"
http://www.geekwire.com/2012/apple-wireless-charging/
"After unveiling the new iPhone 5 yesterday, Apple marketing boss Phil Schiller told AllThingsD that the company doesn’t see much use for the type of wireless charging that Nokia showed, because it still requires the use of a wireless charging unit."
![]()
Roll the clock 4 years:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads...n-order-to-support-wireless-charging.2017119/
= apple U turn
How is it a u-turn?
Apple have been very upfront that they've been wanting to go fully wireless for many years now, the only thing really holding them back was the maturity of wireless charging.
The technology that they want to use won't require the device to be sitting directly on a mat constantly (which is what they didn't like), Extended Range Wireless Charging is a massive step up in both usability and practicality compared to current technology.
Wireless ≠ electromagnetic spectrum.Wireless has very real limits—mostly for safety reasons. You're talking about a non-negligible amount of ERP around people. It's one thing to talk about transmitting a few milliwatts next to your head. It's quite another when you're talking about high single-digit watts. That makes the old analog cell phones look like toys by comparison.... You want to talk about cancer fears... at those power levels, they'll actually be legitimate causes for concern.
Really? LiquidMetal is 100% RF transparent? Id like to know what LiquidMetal consists of.
Just to confirm apple do U turn, hoping they will U turn on the soldering of SSD on 2016 rMBP
From 2012
Phil Schiller on "Wireless charging"
http://www.geekwire.com/2012/apple-wireless-charging/
"After unveiling the new iPhone 5 yesterday, Apple marketing boss Phil Schiller told AllThingsD that the company doesn’t see much use for the type of wireless charging that Nokia showed, because it still requires the use of a wireless charging unit."
![]()
Roll the clock 4 years:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads...n-order-to-support-wireless-charging.2017119/
= apple U turn