I hardly ever use my phone speakers. You don’t have Bluetooth speakers or AirPods?If there is a problem with the air, it’s the speaker. Seems like they are not going to fix the biggest problem. That’s disappointing.
I hardly ever use my phone speakers. You don’t have Bluetooth speakers or AirPods?If there is a problem with the air, it’s the speaker. Seems like they are not going to fix the biggest problem. That’s disappointing.
Apple's in it for the longhaul. By version 5 its sales are gonna surpass the regularThey basically always plan for 2 versions minimum of a new concept.
Even the Vision Pro sales flop got a spec bumped 2nd version.
My beloved iPhone Mini got two releases also.
The only "technological advance" in the near future that could remove weight while offsetting the addition of new features or hardware is the use of a silicon carbon battery. I suspect that the Air's and the new MagSafe battery's encased battery design was meant to transition to SiC at some point. We'll see if that happens with the Air or the folding iPhone.I thought it was obvious I meant all of those things in the same form factor and similar weight. They don't have to add weight and bulk, technological advances could mean Apple finds a solution. Adding a stereo speaker for example would be negligible weight increase (if any, if its replacing a solid piece of the phone) and no bulk increase.
I hardly ever use my phone speakers. You don’t have Bluetooth speakers or AirPods?
Isn't that what the whole "Air" concept is leading to? Now that Apple has the huge aluminum bricks for the power users, getting back to the aesthetics of the "X" should be the next direction....
The downside being of course the 20th anniversary phone is probably going to make a lot of Air 2 buyers upgrade again, assuming it's a separate model and not the 'new pro' thickness wise. Time will tell.
Totally! The whole concept of a thin phone goes out the window with that fugly uneven camera bump. How does Apple not understand this?! When marketing a thin phone, you actually have to make the whole thing…thin!I still don't understand the appeal of a super thin phone with a huge camera bump, but to each their own.
Understandable! Some people prefer the large size!I just can't work with anything smaller in size than my Pro Max. If they had a Max Air......
My Air can hear me from afar, and Siri works HomeKit seamlessly. Speakers are only needed at home, either for voice commands when not in range of HomePods, or calls whilst working the bbq.Thats actually why I went with the 17e instead of Air, all the stuff that is important for a phone to be a phone, like the microphone, speakers and one could even say battery life, are just missing from the Air in comparison to the 17e.
I have. I liked the thinness of the body, and appreciate the engineering that went into getting it that thin, but with that camera bump it's almost back to the thickness of a Pro phone. Like I said, to each their own. I'm in the camp that thinks the Pro models are adequately thin and I'd rather have more battery if the camera system is going to push out the thickness anyway.Have you held one?
For sure. It's a very personal preference. My original comment was more about my disappointment that the camera bump had to be as thick as it is. The idea of a thin phone has more appeal to me when the entire phone is thin.The same can be said of the the pro: a mega camera bump sitting on top of a huge chunk of aluminum. But to each, their own.
With a smaller, worse screen and much less capability since it uses a slower chip.