Surprised to see a new C series chip. Expecting it to be more power efficient. Expecting Apple to quickly shift its devices to the new in house chips.
I don’t think there’s anywhere near accurate, at least for Verizon. Just in DC and Baltimore, there are Verizon mmWaves sites all over the place. That being said, I don’t think mmWave is critical for most users with a cell phone, but Verizon deploys it pretty widely in major cities. I think a more relevant metric would be the percent of people who encounter mmWave coverage daily - since the places that it is have much higher density, I’d guess it’s something like 30% of the US population.
I know other carriers deploy it significantly less.
Meanwhile flagship Androids are getting equipped with the x85Apple doesn’t want to pay Qualcomm any more than they deserve so wouldn’t be surprised if they kept the same modem chip in the x71 as they did by keeping the same s10 chip in the new Apple Watch.
The C2 modem is going to be very good next year. Apple say the new C1X modem chip is 2 times faster than the C1 chip. So the C2 with 5g advanced should be great next year.
Correct, so they should still support mmWave, unlike the airSo the C1X isn’t in the pro models?
Correct only because the new C1X does not support MMwave, but the C2 will support it next year and be in all the Pro Models. Goodbye Qualcomm!So the C1X isn’t in the pro models?
Samsung doesn’t have a problem paying Qualcomm but Apple 🍎 does.Meanwhile flagship Androids are getting equipped with the x85
Well I was also going to say there are better options in the 4.9/5GHz range as well as potentially the 8-12GHz range which has much better propagation properties that make it a good balance between mmWave and high band 3-4GHz spectrum.Even the density argument is pretty weak since many Asian cities make do without them (very well) even in their high density areas like major train stations.