Love the iPhone air, given me an experience I haven’t felt since the iPhone X. I think the biggest concern comes down to the battery life.
Photographers and cinematographers would always go to the pro route for the cameras. So the air was never for them. So the question becomes 17 vs air. So at this point we can easily tell the differences between the two. I would argue the battery and maybe the telephoto lens are the two biggest features lacking. The telephoto lens, I’m not sure how popular this actually is amongst daily users, I never used mine much, so it’s loss is no factor for me. But the battery life seems way more significant. Most people deal with the reality of needing a charge in the middle of the day, so why “upgrade” to a phone that you may have to charge more often?
I think that’s where the main miss was. If the air somehow could have a battery capacity between the 17 and the 17 pro, I believe it would have blown through the sales.
Though using it, it definitely I feel it’s more of an experience phone. If one loved the features and benefits of the phones on paper, androids may be the victor. But apple has been one to thrive on user experiences. So the air seems to be drawing more to those who have had “more than enough” with their existing phones for a while, but excited for a new experience. The 13 pro had everything I needed and more. Everything since then has felt incremental and boring for me. Never got the “apple” feel. The air I think is the introduction to that, to gauge how many are interested in something different. Obviously they are doing the fold next year for about double the price, so to launch the air to gauge the level of interest could be a stepping stone for them to predict the manufacturing quantity required for next years phones?