Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If 9 out 10 of days, the iPhone Air built-in battery is enough, then you only need to use the battery pack 1 out of 10 days. And even in that 1 day, you'd only have the battery pack attached for about an hour (the time it would take to empty the battery pack at 12w). So all in all, in a given 10-day period, you'd only have a thick iPhone Air + battery pack phone less than 1% of the time, and the 99% of the time you'd just have an thinner phone.

I'm not getting the Air, but it's for camera reasons. The battery is a total non-issue.
The battery is definitely not a big deal breaker some here are making it out to be. Battery life is comparable to previous Pro models, maybe including the 16 Pro. The camera might be a deal breaker for some and if you want to focus on that, go ahead. I’ll probably get the 17 Pro, but I haven’t held the Air yet so who knows? I might change my mind.
 
If 9 out 10 of days, the iPhone Air built-in battery is enough, then you only need to use the battery pack 1 out of 10 days. And even in that 1 day, you'd only have the battery pack attached for about an hour (the time it would take to empty the battery pack at 12w). So all in all, in a given 10-day period, you'd only have a thick iPhone Air + battery pack phone less than 1% of the time, and the 99% of the time you'd just have an thinner phone.

I'm not getting the Air, but it's for camera reasons. The battery is a total non-issue.
It really depends on if the iphone air lasts all day with your usage. If it does, then no issue. If it doesn't, then you should have gotten a thicker phone
 
I don’t get why Apple couldn’t make this a 5000mAh battery pack, to DOUBLE the Air’s endurance, when quite literally every other MagSafe battery pack is. And most of them are no thicker or heavier (and also MUCH cheaper) than this one…
 
Good article, not a huge deal for myself and the other majority of light users buying the Air. Nice to have on an as-needed basis.
 
  • Love
Reactions: RMMediccc
This, I always thought a magsafe system that relies on wireless charging makes zero sense. If it needs to physically touch the device just make it a physical connection more like a Macbook magsafe.
Agreed. They could design something similar to the Smart Connector on iPads, only non-proprietary and designed for efficient and rapid charging. (Charging via the Smart Connector is pretty slow because that wasn't what it was primarily designed for.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactagonist
If anyone buys this battery pack, why didn’t you just get a slightly thicker phone? Because with this thing attached, it’s fatter than a Pro phone 😄

The Air has way too many compromises.
Because I only need more battery once or twice a month. The rest of the time I’m not carrying a huge brick in a phone in my pocket.

iPhone Air has exactly one compromise I am
worried about: cameras. I may return it if it turns out I can’t live with the camera, but as someone who generally finishes the day with 30-40% battery, I’m excited at the possibility of having something thin and light after years of the pro max.
 
Last edited:
iPhone Air customers are summed up with one phrase “more money than brains”. 😂

Increase the iPhone Air asking price then charge more for an external battery pack to get through an unrestricted day of usage, at that accumulated price might as well go for a Pro.

Just because a device isn’t for you doesn’t mean those who like it have “more money than brains.”

Literally the exact same comments were made about the first MacBook Air. Here’s a random one from that thread:

I kinda thing you are the one that is brain cell challenged. A computer is a tool first, not a piece of art. Who gives a flip if the MBA is thin as Kate Moss if it lacks key functionality...like a replaceable battery. This isn't crying, it's constructive criticism. Honestly, if you are going to spend $1700 for a Word Processor/Internet terminal then you are the one a few short on the IQ points with all due respect. I'd rather Apple had announced Penryn MBP today instead. At least that would be usable. The MBA is just pretty...pretty pointless.

Turns out a lot of the innovation from that device (that, yes was compromised and expensive) led to the amazing thin laptops, phones and tablets we have today. Was it for everyone, no. But aren’t we glad Apple made it anyway?

Glad Apple doesn’t take product design advice from MacRumors forum posters.
 
If 9 out 10 of days, the iPhone Air built-in battery is enough, then you only need to use the battery pack 1 out of 10 days. And even in that 1 day, you'd only have the battery pack attached for about an hour (the time it would take to empty the battery pack at 12w). So all in all, in a given 10-day period, you'd only have a thick iPhone Air + battery pack phone less than 1% of the time, and the 99% of the time you'd just have an thinner phone.

I'm not getting the Air, but it's for camera reasons. The battery is a total non-issue.

Finally... someone gets it. Seems most people don't want to spend 60 seconds to understand what it's really about and how it would be used.
 
This is hilarious… like… let's make the battery half as thick and charge extra, and call it the thinest iPhone ever…
You don’t have to buy a battery. For most people, the Air’s battery life is just fine. A lot of reviewers have found they do have an all-day battery life for most users. This battery pack is for heavy, heavy users who would normally gravitate towards a Pro Max version. With the battery pack, it does have a longer battery life than the 17 Pro Max, a really chunky, heavy phone.

I bought an Air and its battery life will suit me without difficulty. I am a light user because I prefer iPads over iPhones and will likely finish a day with over 50% battery left over. Such a battery pack isn’t useful to me, and I have no plans to buy one.

Basically Apple made the battery pack for those who need it. If you don’t need it, there’s no reason to buy it. Would you prefer to carry a massive phone all the time or add a battery pack sometimes while having a light, svelte phone most of the time? If you are a heavy user, you’d want the former. For those who only occasionally have heavy use, the latter is better.
 
Man, wireless charging really does suck from an efficiency standpoint. I wonder why Apple went with it opposed to pins and magnets like MacBooks.
Most people aren’t going to buy a battery pack and will charge their phones nightly using Qi chargers. What’s the point of having unsightly pins that only add complexity to the design and make things look rather ugly when Qi2 is already built-in, especially when most users aren’t going to get a battery pack at all? People know wireless charging isn’t that efficient, yet they still use Qi2 for their charging next to their nightstand.

It isn’t as if there aren’t a zillion other Qi battery packs on the market either. It’s a pretty standard use case. There’s no point in complicating things with yet a third charging method. Maybe Apple will do that someday if they create a truly portless iPhone, but today is not that day.
 
Seeing what should give you roughly double the charge only give you 2/3rds of that really makes me wish iphones had contacts like on the back of ipads instead of inductive charging for magsafe. Not sure what that would do for water resistance, but it could be way more efficient.
 
Half as thick as what? What is Apple charging extra for? Also, is it not the thinnest iPhone ever?

Don't the battery life tests posted here on MacRumors show the Air has similar battery life to the thicker iPhone 17?
People here are still making the same complaint as the first day that since Apple decided to provide a battery pack that must mean that the battery life sucks and everyone is expected to use a thick battery pack all of the time. I guess looking at the specs showing a good battery life or ready any of the articles is just too much to ask.
 
The iPhone Air is a joke.

I can’t help but think every Apple executive is sitting around a table, with Tim Cook laughing like Doctor Evil at the end, as people fall for the Air hype train.

Buyers remorse in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 …
Not everyone has the same use cases as you do, so while it may be a joke to you, it’s perfect for me. There are days I don’t even take my phone off of its charger and I routinely finish with 80% charge left on mine or more. I doubt the Air would get lower than 50% on the vast majority of days. I also don’t take that many photos or videos every year. I think I might have taken a few dozen photos using the main camera, and most of those were grocery lists off of the refrigerator that i would delete after shopping.

When I had grade school kids, the most important thing about a phone to me was the telephoto lens, as many parents would attest to as they sat in row 30 while their kids were on stage, looking microscopic to a wide angle or ultrawide lens. Needs change, and this phone is absolutely perfect for me. I no longer need a telephoto or an ultrawide lens, so the Air was tailor made to my needs.

While I can’t speak for most others, there are people for whom the Air is a great phone. It’s light, has good, but not great battery life. It has the lens that most people use. What more would those people want out of a phone? To me, this is a no-compromise phone because I just don’t need the stuff the pros have. Raise your hands if you plan to use ProRes Raw, for instance.
 
It has the same capacity, but can only charge the iPhone Air to about 60%? That tracks with the efficiency of the power bank I've been testing. It charges with enough electrons based on its capacity, but only delivers 65-70% of that in output.

My conclusion is that, from an efficiency perspective, one should try to start the day fully charged and only use power banks to give a little (or big) bump towards the middle/end of the day to prevent hitting zero battery.
 
No, you don't understand. That commenter is being forced to buy the Air. Tim Cook is personally shipping an Air to that individual's home and garnishing that commenter's wages until it's paid off. If the commenter defaults -- instant debtor's prison with no chance of parole!
"Not buying it" is one thing but I'd rather the Air didn't exist. In its place could be a properly specced Mini. A form factor that is actually different and serves a different audience.
 
"Not buying it" is one thing but I'd rather the Air didn't exist. In its place could be a properly specced Mini. A form factor that is actually different and serves a different audience.
I do wish there were a mini as well for my daughter’s sake, since she loves her 13 mini, but people just didn’t buy it in any significant quantity to justify keeping it. The same goes for the iPhone Plus models. The vast majority wants bigger and bigger screens to the point where foldables are a thing. It’s quite possible not enough people will buy an Air to the point where it will be discontinued, but we’ll see how that goes. If indeed the Air is just a test drive for the Apple Foldable and how thin they can make a phone, the Air may end up being discontinued in favor of the foldable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
"Not buying it" is one thing but I'd rather the Air didn't exist. In its place could be a properly specced Mini. A form factor that is actually different and serves a different audience.
I'd take a mini over the Air in a heartbeat. I also acknowledge that I'm in the minority there.

That said, given the current options, the Air is certainly a notch above the rest (for me).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.