Pretty sure Apple makes you update the phones to the latest available software when you do a battery replacement, no matter which phone it is.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone Air Reviews: Is the Ultra-Thin Design Worth the Compromises?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Missing the ultra wide, which has been known for sometime now, is what it is. Apples to apples comparison between the Air and the Android competitors in the reviews dropped this morning definitely do not support your disappointment thesis. The Air seems to deliver better images. Did you not read the reviews you're apparently referring to?
I know this device is peak compromises gone wild but boy did I buy one. It’s form over function 100 but it’s stunning.
For those constantly scared of the mediocre battery life a first comparison. Fast forward to 12:20m
If he's right the Air's battery performance is within 5% difference compared to the regular iPhone 17.
If he's right the Air's battery performance is within 5% difference compared to the regular iPhone 17.
Call me a dinosaur, but I call the ability to comfortably carry a phone in my front pocket "function" and worth a bit more to me than a second tiny speaker.
Watch iJustine’s iPhone Air video and tell me what you think
This video is symbolic of how YouTube isn’t what it used to be anymore. Objectivity? Hardly to be found. Battery, Speaker? Missing
This video is symbolic of how YouTube isn’t what it used to be anymore. Objectivity? Hardly to be found. Battery, Speaker? Missing
I don't think the iPhone Air design will mature until we get better battery chemistry for a future model. With several companies finally starting to slowly ramp up solid-state battery production, by this time in 2026 the next model iPhone Air could get a thin battery rated as high as 4,200 mAh, which means almost iPhone 16 Plus battery life.
Who cares that HE DIDNT REVIEW THE PHONE... the point I was making to the person I originally replied to is that not all youtubers are biased. The fact that he didn't review the air is IRRELEVANT here. He has hundreds of videos where he is critical of Apple products
What we need are honest MR member reviews.
Last edited:
And Apple expects us to believe those are actual, unbiased reviews of these phones?
That’s not fair that some “special” YouTubers get the device earlier than 95% of people.
It is worth to wait for direct comparisons, especially of battery life and camera performance. I haven’t really seen anything in all the current reviews, more like “unboxing” useless videos from 2013 YouTube era
That’s not fair that some “special” YouTubers get the device earlier than 95% of people.
It is worth to wait for direct comparisons, especially of battery life and camera performance. I haven’t really seen anything in all the current reviews, more like “unboxing” useless videos from 2013 YouTube era
So, you expect a phone sporting an elegant, groundbreaking form factor to deliver this without a price premium? Hmmm.
Battery life is not a big deal for me in my daily use, plenty of access to chargers or portable chargers. My question would be is there any way to do macro photography? I use this daily more for fun than anything else, but not sure I’m ready to give up my 16 pro. But to be honest, I wish I had kept my 15 pro instead of upgrading to the heavier, bulkier, though much cooler to hold 16 pro.
I'm not sure what I trust less: The Influencer-As-Apple-Mouthpiece YouTube avalanche, or the Apple Sycophant Keyboard Warrior Army patting themselves on the back for making such a great choice and making sure to tell everyone what a great choice they made over and over again.
If someone goes to an Apple Store, picks up an Air, and thinks, "yeah, this is for me," then good on them. I hope they use it in good health. The tortured, endless conversation about that decision, however, is just so much narcissism.
I understand what you are saying, but it's the situations where I am not by a wall outlet. I am a light to medium user, and I still don't get through a day with an iphone 15 pro using ios26.
exactly, you get it. for me the pro max can be bulky but I’ll probably get one as a business phone.Call me a dinosaur, but I call the ability to comfortably carry a phone in my front pocket "function" and worth a bit more to me than a second tiny speaker.
Miss the legacy or classic extension that was not updated but know that will never happen. A lot would pay good amount for it. Not all of course. My point is was quicker, by only a little, with new content on any kind of discussion forum. Sometimes too much so.
Air works well with more than one other device like anything else mobile. If finding a balance or close.
Air works well with more than one other device like anything else mobile. If finding a balance or close.
On the other hand, if you compare iPhone Air to its direct competitor - Samsung Galaxy Edge - the Samsung design really looks superior:
- much higher battery capacity
- dual speakers
- dual cameras (and 200MP vs 48MP for Air)
- 6.7" vs 6.5" screen
- two grams lighter than Air
- just 0.2mm thicker than Air
- $700 vs $1000
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Valid points. I get my Air on Friday. I will use it for a good and then post my honest thoughts and I will not be comparing to to Pro models.
I expect a phone with a smaller battery, fewer camera options, one less speaker, etc. to be cheaper than $100 less than the Pro version of the same phone. The pricing on this thing just doesn’t make sense, especially with how good the base iPhone is this year.
You're right. In all of the posts and reviews on the Air, this is the first time someone noticed this is on a 100% battery, out of the box. If your battery experience out of the box is "okay", that doesn't bode well. Also, someone saying battery life is better than expected is also not a sign of praise if we don't know what that person expected.
I agree. I'm not a hater, I want the Air to succeed, but they placed it in the line-up where it shouldn't have been with these compromises.
You know, it's almost as if you don't HAVE to watch them....
Was having high-level tech discussion with my wife this morning and concluded that the mobile phone market has hit maturity in the mass market. Those who have owned a mobile device for 20+ years have watched the evolution of mobile communications - voice, text messaging, picture messaging, pseudo “smart phones”, and ultimately iPhone and Android devices. Phones went from slow, clunky plastic devices to slabs of precisely formed metal and glass which play music, take pictures, browse websites, play games, make video calls, and on and on. Large, tangible innovations were being added yearly and the push was to get mobile devices on par with the average desktop computer.
The result: today’s phones pretty much do everything the typical person needs or wants. Large, tangible innovations have been implemented which means that customers are given fewer and fewer reasons to upgrade at the aggressive pace of the past. If I upgrade my 2-year-old iPhone with a new one, what am I really getting? What does “2x faster” even mean for the typical doom scroller? Is liquid glass really going to revolutionize my productivity, or is this just the latest take on GUI fashion? Waiting one more year to upgrade is becoming easier and easier.
Bringing this idea back around to the iPhone Air, should we really be surprised by its existence? To the average person, the regular and pro iPhones are essentially identical. Tangibly, the $300 premium gets you a third camera, but what else? Seriously, think about that. Now has never been a better time to buy the regular iPhone! And because of that lack of differentiation, the Air opens up an opportunity for an alternative purchase (albeit with compromises). Historically, “skinny” phones always shipped with compromises*, but this is an opportunity for Apple to recoup R&D dollars and maybe even sell a fashion statement. It certainly has people talking and asking questions. Maybe the Air is ultimately a segue into next-year’s foldable phone, and it’s purpose is to train the customer to expect similar compromises to battery life or camera selection.
*Apple’s marketing group gave it their best effort convincing everyone that battery should be measured in video hours and not average or mixed use. More deplorably, a 2x crop was referred to as “optically equivalent” of a narrower zoom which is disingenuous at best.
The result: today’s phones pretty much do everything the typical person needs or wants. Large, tangible innovations have been implemented which means that customers are given fewer and fewer reasons to upgrade at the aggressive pace of the past. If I upgrade my 2-year-old iPhone with a new one, what am I really getting? What does “2x faster” even mean for the typical doom scroller? Is liquid glass really going to revolutionize my productivity, or is this just the latest take on GUI fashion? Waiting one more year to upgrade is becoming easier and easier.
Bringing this idea back around to the iPhone Air, should we really be surprised by its existence? To the average person, the regular and pro iPhones are essentially identical. Tangibly, the $300 premium gets you a third camera, but what else? Seriously, think about that. Now has never been a better time to buy the regular iPhone! And because of that lack of differentiation, the Air opens up an opportunity for an alternative purchase (albeit with compromises). Historically, “skinny” phones always shipped with compromises*, but this is an opportunity for Apple to recoup R&D dollars and maybe even sell a fashion statement. It certainly has people talking and asking questions. Maybe the Air is ultimately a segue into next-year’s foldable phone, and it’s purpose is to train the customer to expect similar compromises to battery life or camera selection.
*Apple’s marketing group gave it their best effort convincing everyone that battery should be measured in video hours and not average or mixed use. More deplorably, a 2x crop was referred to as “optically equivalent” of a narrower zoom which is disingenuous at best.