Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Almost as if private consumers and classified military systems have different use cases and requirements.
But, they both can benefit from the same underlying "secure" solution. Why have two different (software wise) devices, when it shares the same needs? Both get what they need in the end. And if you want "Open". Then buy an open device.
 
The device can be both open and secure – the user decides what is more important and gets the best of both worlds.
Yeah I think that's the rub. If you want high security, you can't have it so open. It's a balancing act. For anyone that thinks you can be open and secure with technology are living in a fantasy land. I present to you: Android.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DailySlow
Yeah I think that's the rub. If you want high security, you can't have it so open. It's a balancing act. For anyone that thinks you can be open and secure with technology are living in a fantasy land. I present to you: Android.

Unix in general is pretty secure, and so is Linux or MacOS, for that matter. Pegasus has shown that the iPhone isn't invulnerable, as have multiple scam apps that have made it onto the App Store.

Yes it's always a trade off but I think there's plenty of examples that show that open and secure are not mutually exclusive.
 
Unix in general is pretty secure, and so is Linux or MacOS, for that matter. Pegasus has shown that the iPhone isn't invulnerable, as have multiple scam apps that have made it onto the App Store.

Yes it's always a trade off but I think there's plenty of examples that show that open and secure are not mutually exclusive.
Indeed. The real trade off is between convenience and security.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.