If you are using passcodes in 2018, you deserve to have your phone hacked. Lets get real. Nobody that is trying to hide information on their phone is going to be using a passcode
There are some people in this thread who think this is funny. I've had a coworker who had her identity stolen. It is a life changing event. She is not important. She doesn't have state secrets. She doesn't work for a vast organized crime ring.
So no, you don't need to be important to take security seriously. Hackers make money or simply have fun taking over accounts. Having your electronic identity stolen and accounts taken over is extremely time consuming to undo, very inconvenient, and expensive. And you never know if it is completely over.
Anyone getting access to your phone or your computer, as if they were you, then has access to your web history and email. With access to web history and email they can see all of the places you go to that have accounts. With access to your email they can take over any number of accounts that use email for password resets, even banking accounts. Some accounts won't even need the email password reset, if you have autofill enabled.
Think you're secure because you enabled 2-factor authentication? Nope, they've got the second factor...your phone, which is going to receive any SMS, call, or email needed for 2-factor authentication, and it will have the authenticator apps on it for time-based codes.
So even though nobody has any particular interest in targeting most of us, and odds are very low, the stakes on the other hand are extraordinarily high. It's certainly enough that I'm willing to have a code that's just a little bit longer, and with TouchID or FaceID you don't even have to enter it all that often. Also do the same practices on your tablets and home computers.
This is also why I hate the "if you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" argument. Wrongdoing has nothing to do with it. Everyone has something to hide--access to your critical accounts.
True...I think. Law enforcement really, really pushes the boundaries and the law is still evolving. There is too much conflicting information out there for a non-legal expert like me to be sure of the law in the location I happen to be in (I travel, both in the U.S. and abroad):Fair point, and I definitely agree with the sentiment! But I do think that if they (the authorities) were to get legal permission, a warrant, to get into your stuff it wouldn't make much of a difference whether you have a 4-digit passcode or some character-riddled 12-character monster of a password -- if they have to get past something, it's a "locked door" legally, right?
What makes you think they're the only ones who might want to get into your phone, legally or otherwise?Don’t do anything where your phone could be taken by law enforcement, simple.
What if you just want to do your banking on your phone? Can you have strong encryption then?It's simpler to remember the Ten Commandments than to remember a ten-digit passcode. If you need to be a law breaker or anarchist, avoid using computers and cellphones to conduct business.
Apple: fix this. If I activate a feature that is supposed to wipe out the phone after 10 incorrect password guesses, I expect it to work.
Just changed to an alphanumeric passcode. Not that I don't trust law enforcement with search warrants, but I know it's only a matter of time until one of these devices falls into the wrong hands.
Don’t do anything where your phone could be taken by law enforcement, simple.
Oh, hey, I have that combination on my luggage.Sigh. Fine. I’m going to pick a random Welsh street sign and add my high school gym locker combination to it.
View attachment 758545
My understanding of how it works is that it copies the contents of the phone into virtual machines that can then rapidly try different codes. Throttling never comes into play because they are effectively using thousands of different virtual phones and then discarding them. That means the real limitation is how fast the computer can enter the PIN then move on to the next VM.They shouldn't be able to crack the throttling. This is the crux of brute force protection.
True...I think. Law enforcement really, really pushes the boundaries and the law is still evolving. There is too much conflicting information out there for a non-legal expert like me to be sure of the law in the location I happen to be in (I travel, both in the U.S. and abroad)
I've seen 25 character mixed case with numbers of special characters cracked in under 20 hours. But keep telling yourself that kind of stuff is impossible if it makes you feel better.
It's simpler to remember the Ten Commandments than to remember a ten-digit passcode. If you need to be a law breaker or anarchist, avoid using computers and cellphones to conduct business.