lol.....not so much...they both stopped innovating that lead to losing sales....market share....losing billions of dollars....
remember Blackberry was YOUR analogy
They aren't losing sales.
They lost market share.
Lack of innovation didn't cause the end of blackberry
Innovation didn't even cause the succes of the iPhone. A radical rethinking of the actual needs of customers did.
The only reason numbers matter is to quantify things. But megapixels don't quantify camera quality. Ghz don't quantify the usage speeds. Expansion ports don't quantify flexibility, and price doesn't quantify value. Price doesn't even quantify costs...
The answers are correct, on paper the competition sometimes wins. But the questions are wrong.
I don't have an iPhone because of inertia, stupidity etc. I have an iPhone because the value is high, the costs are low, and it's one of the least invasive devices I know.
The size of Apple concerns me, from a consumers state of view, because keeping that size may cause them to take decisions because they are commercial. The general public is, imho, ignorant about their own wants and needs (I don't mean this in a bad way, I think it's hard to find out your actual key reasons for decisions). Customer should be king but the servant should act in the Kings best interest even if the king thinks he wants something else.
I've yet to find a decision of Apple (even the ones I don't like, I'm not 100% happy about them by a long shot) are taken from that point of view.
It's contra intuitive and hard to sell to shareholders. The fact that didn't matter to them is what makes Apple great.