Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yet another stupid chart showing sales of ALL Samsung smartphones when most of them are low-end junk phones. Same goes for the other manufacturers listed.

Next up IDC should show a chart comparing the sales of Toyota to Mercedes and tell us all how Mercedes market share is so much lower than Toyota.
Please define "junk" phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Maybe the general populace consensus is the wait for the iPhone 7 is what people want. And there will be extraordinary pent up demand for the i7.

Consensus on the MR threads would say that people are going to take a pass on the 2016 edition and wait for the mega-release in 2017 - the numbers are the numbers - but nothing like seeing an optimistic fan / shareholder kicking and scratching for reasons.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
They may do some, but you should not expect they will release a device with micro SD slot. This is too android-like.
Meanwhile, you can consider waterproof, dustproof and OLED display. They are possible for Apple to implement.

32gb base storage.
increase the resolution of the display
waterproofing
OLED display
Flatter Camera or at least add OIS to their flagship device.
New designs for the casings.
smaller bezels top and bottom
move to industry standard ports (USB C instead of proprietary lightning)

these are all things I would like to see in the next few iPhones for them to justify the device costing flagship prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trifid
You do realize that those phones were on a contract correct? Nowadays, without contracts, carriers will no longer subsidize phones. Apple never offered a $199 iPhone, carriers did.
An hence the lower selling of iPhone. I guess Apple's financing option didn't pan out well either.
 
This hysterical overreaction to Apple failing to beat a previous YoY blockbuster quarter of growth is insane.

Apple is fine:

- They still make the very best products in every category they have entered.
- They still have same obsessive attention to detail that we all love.
- Nobody does more product innovation than Apple.
- Nobody cares more about design and usability than Apple.
- They still have the best customer care in the industry.
- They still make all the profit.

People need to calm down.

As for the demands for Apple to make a bigger commitment to the Mac, I'm sorry but that is a dying business. Yesterday's numbers show the Mac is now in decline like rest of the PC industry. Apple will continue selling Macs, but they are not going to waste a large number of precious resources on a business that has no longterm future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shlooky and I7guy
I have an idea, stop making things thinner, less compatible, and with fewer connections, and give people what they want until you think of something else they didn't know they wanted until you showed it to them. This goes for mobile devices and computers. People were willing to ride the bleeding-edge to drop floppy drives, then CDs, then collect a small army of video adapters when Apple was making things so over the top "insanely great" it was worth the small headaches. It's getting less and less worth it. I'm certainly not going to spend money just to have to re-buy headphones for a gazillion $s because the mini-plug is too husky.
 
Yet every measure of what matters to a business (Revenue, Profit) apple is doing laps around Android.

What good is an install base if it's not generating a return? What incentives do developers have for a platform that makes half of the revenue with more than a quadruple install base?
Sounds like the history is going to repeat itself. Remember Apple vs Microsoft competition?
 
Smartphones aren't interesting any more. They haven't really done anything new for the last 5 years. They just got faster. Most people just use their phones for texting, calls and Internet. My Nokia with b&w lcd display from 10 or so years ago did that. Phone upgrades are nothing more than a once a year treat, like a holiday. Apple needs to find a new vein to tap before it completely looses out to China. I can get a smartphone with same specs as an iPhone or Samsung direct from China with free shipping for just over £100. Why the hell would you pay £700? Just to impress your friends for five minutes?

Apple have a dual eye camera on the next phone yet all they are using it for is just to get clearer photographs. Boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: big-ted
Finally a balanced article on the iPhone drop in sales.

I don't want Apple to slow down their profiting. Android may own the marketshare but Apple owns 90% of the profit (I think that is the number I read)....so we want a company to stop making money????

THIS IS NOT A CHARITY. Profit is not a dirty word.

If your thinking is that it is wrong for a company to get "more than its fair share of the profit", you have succumbed successfully to the brainwashing that capitalism is bad. Sorry to rant but I am a business owner and you have no idea what it takes to get to sleep at night worrying about things and the future and whether my employees are taken care of.
 
I am getting tired of this rubbish as well. They should just compare flagship phones, otherwise it's apples and oranges.

Doesn't work.
If everyone bought their devices outright, yes. Depending on region, many now "finance/installment" their devices. This makes even a high-end smartphone affordable. Many regions/countries don't have this option. There are too many variables and too many ways to realistically do up a comparison.
Finally, define flagship.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Smartphones are a commodity.
Dual lens, waterproof, faster, slimmer are all features that are welcomed, but not imperative to have.
Most people needs are already served by the phones they have.
Apple will be fine, but the days of around the block lineups are over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdale and dk001
That's a huge part of it.

I have a 6+ and it works great. No need to go to a 6S+ or a 7, and likely not an 8. As a photographer my 6+ is the perfect phone for my use. The battery lasts for two days, the large screen is great, it's fast, never hangs, and integrates well with Mac OS/AirDrop and the rest of the Apple ecosystem.

What I don't need is a version that is pimped up with a curved screen and other worthless dingle balls.

So the S7's superior low-light performance, and superior focus speed is "worthless dingle balls"? Because it blows the 6s out of the water and it's something the casual user would instantly benefit from, since you know, low-light conditions are fairly common in daily camera use.

Apple used to be ahead of everyone else by at least a year. Now they are behind everyone else by a year or more.

Apple has played it far too safe, the market has responded.

s7-vs-iphone6-camera-1.jpg


 
So the S7's superior low-light performance, and superior focus speed is "worthless dingle balls"? Because it blows the 6s out of the water and it's something the casual user would instantly benefit from, since you know, low-light conditions are fairly common in daily camera use.

Apple has played it far too safe, the market has responded.

s7-vs-iphone6-camera-1.jpg

in the eyes of an apple fanboy, anything that is in a competiting device that Apple hasn't done is a gimmick and useless, at least until Apple also uses it, then it's a feature and apple invented and did it best :p
 
I would really like to see market share for phones purchased by users that use them as a smartphone. For example, downloading at least two third-party apps might be an indicator; or setting up their work email might be an indicator. Exclude those phones that aren't used as a smartphone.

I think there is a large number of very inexpensive android phones out there that have pretty much replaced the feature phones, and those inexpensive smartphones are still being used like feature phones (calls and texting only). I think it is misleading to include those in the smartphone market share. Smartphones are about apps, and if a phone isn't being used for apps and the user has no intent to use it like that, it shouldn't be counted in the data developers look to when figuring out how to develop their apps.

I know plenty of people who use their iPhones for texting and calls too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
And from the latest quarter and projected NEXT quarter it looks to be pulling away from Apple.

From the Bloomberg article cited above

"The iPhone is so expensive that the company captures more than 90 percent of all global smartphone profits while holding down less than a 20 percent market share of unit shipments.

That says it all, don't it?

This unbalance just means that a small market share change can have big impact on the profit side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Yet every measure of what matters to a business (Revenue, Profit) apple is doing laps around Android.

What good is an install base if it's not generating a return? What incentives do developers have for a platform that makes half of the revenue with more than a quadruple install base?

You are misinformed. While Apple does very well in revenue and profit categories, it does not lead Android in revenues. Here is a chart that shows market share by units and revenue for 2014. I suspect that Android's market share by revenue increased since then.

Android-Marketshare.png


Link

As one can see, in 2014 Android's revenue was more than twice higher than that of iOS devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Don't know what you're going on about. Yet again someone using the word "overpriced" without knowing what it means. If iPhones were overpriced then they wouldn't be selling 200-300 million per year. They might be classed as expensive by some, but then again so are many of the other latest flagship phones, some even more than the iPhone 6S. As for not being able to afford an iPhone, there are various ways to get one, there are five current models (iPhone SE, iPhone 6 & 6 Plus, iPhone 6S & 6S Plus) for a start all at differing price points. You don't have to buy your device outright, there are contracts at differing prices along with the newer instalment plans. A chance for anyone, regardless of income to get a foothold on the iPhone ladder. Then there's the refurbished/used route which a lot of people take, you can easily pick up a now discontinued iPhone 5S at a great price as retailers sell remaining stock.

Apple wouldn't go for the price it lower and go for volume business, they'll leave that to Android manufacturers. And just as a correction, the offshore workforce is not Apple's it's Foxconn/Pegatron, etc. and these Chinese companies manufacture goods for several large tech companies not just Apple. It needs the entire industry to raise wages, Apple is very vocal about supplier responsibility and gets a hard time over it while others remain silent on the issue.
Apple could be selling 400-600 million if the price was more reasonable. Apple's app business is price low and go for volume. The offshore workforce is effectively Apple's. Those workers, working on Apple parts, assembling Apple devices, are focusing all their hours working for Apple, they're certainly part if Apple's workforce, although quite forgotten. Apple talks a lot about supplier responsibility, but at the end of the day, even after their most recent report, it's woefully well away from anything to brag about, especially more so considering revenues.
 
Apple has its foundations in computing and continues in this tradition with decided success. Given this sound foundation, I have always thought it odd that Apple has not better integrated the iPhone with its computing solutions to form a more unified work and home environment, an option not readily available to other cell phone manufacturers. We perform activities unique to each device but the two don't readily communicate. Neither device serves as an enhanced extension of the other.
 
But who is making the most profit?

Those profits are coming to an end and if rumors about the iphone 7 turn out to be true I.E. no major redesign. Then look for sales to sink even further. It doesn't really matter how high your profit margin is if you're not selling phones. I can make a phone and price it at $50,000 that would be a hefty profit for something that cost me $150 to make. If I sell zero phones how does that work for me? Flagship phones are too expensive from all manufacturers. There is nothing that an iphone or GS7 does that a $300-$400 phone can't do. You could argue the GS7 gives you water proofing and that might be worth the extra money for some people. Carriers removing subsidies aren't helping, it has enabled your average consumer to figure out how expensive these things really are and people are also hanging on to these phones a lot longer.

The numbers aren't going to be there for Apple, the sales of these phones will continue to decline unless something dramatic happens. They need a spectacular phone that is jaw dropping or they will have to cut the price down to compete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit and R3k
Consensus on the MR threads would say that people are going to take a pass on the 2016 edition and wait for the mega-release in 2017 - the numbers are the numbers - but nothing like seeing an optimistic fan / shareholder kicking and scratching for reasons.

We know MR forums are a microcosm of the real world and the posts here can be extrapolated to the populace in general.
 
You are misinformed. While Apple does very well in revenue and profit categories, it does not lead Android in revenues. Here is a chart that shows market share by units and revenue for 2014. I suspect that Android's market share by revenue increased since then.

Android-Marketshare.png


Link

As one can see, in 2014 Android's revenue was more than twice higher than that of iOS devices.
I should have clarified, I thought the platform comment was enough but clearly not, sorry about that. I was referring to app revenue (which Google relies on because they license the platform for very little).

http://9to5mac.com/2016/04/19/ios-app-store-half-downloads-google-play-store-twice-revenue/

appannie-q1-2016.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.