Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yup, not surprised. And not surprised with all the juvenile snark and hate, either. Par for the course here.

Apple manufactures a lot of what people want, people who are willing to open their wallet and purchase.

Though it will taper off past Christmas, Apple currently manufactures, sells, and delivers roughly 800,000 iPhones every day. Compare that to the meager 2.5 million Samsung Note 7 phones delivered in the first two weeks since their launch, before the fires and recall started.

The math is pretty straightforward...

You better check your maths; based on last quarter results, Apple sold around half oh what you claim per day, all models, globally. Not that it matters, but the Note 7 (one model) sold 2.5 million in approx 3 countries in 2 weeks. Now do your maths on Samsung, all models, globally?
 
Why are they silly? What does your data show?
It is silly, because they are analysts reports based on following indicators and takes no account of what companies make off each other, e.g if Samsung didn't make a single phone of their own (obviously they do) given they make numerous phone components (chips, screens, batteries etc.) for everyone else, they would still make a fortune from mobile phones, but of course no one considers this and this is always tagged as their chips business.

Likewise Sony makes lots of camera components for others which is clearly making money from mobile phones, but never considered either.
 
Another MacRumors post and nothing but hateful comments.

Honest question, if all the folks here do these days is complain about Apple, why bother wasting your time? Is there really nothing better to do with your time than read articles here and spend it complaining about something complaints will do absolutely nothing to change?

I have replied the same thing to other haters a few times before. They just want to show their existence and their comments count! I'm glad almost 100% iPhone buyers don't have the same mindshare.
 
I have replied the same thing to other haters a few times before. They just want to show their existence and their comments count! I'm glad almost 100% iPhone buyers don't have the same mindshare.

Agreed. And they act like they know what there talking about, when in fact there completely ignorant. It's just a reminder it's Macrumors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomwhom
I have replied the same thing to other haters a few times before. They just want to show their existence and their comments count! I'm glad almost 100% iPhone buyers don't have the same mindshare.

But of course.

There is so much noise in the market. The good CEO knows who to listen to and which noises to filter out. And in this regard, I think Tim Cook has done his job marvellously.

If companies based their product decisions on a small but extremely vocal group of critics who think of nothing but their own specific needs, they would have tanked a long time ago.

There's a reason why I buy Apple products and not run a company responsible for making Apple products.
 
It is silly, because they are analysts reports based on following indicators and takes no account of what companies make off each other, e.g if Samsung didn't make a single phone of their own (obviously they do) given they make numerous phone components (chips, screens, batteries etc.) for everyone else, they would still make a fortune from mobile phones, but of course no one considers this and this is always tagged as their chips business.

Likewise Sony makes lots of camera components for others which is clearly making money from mobile phones, but never considered either.

But this story is about manufactured smartphone sales, not electronic components used in smartphones. Customers buy a product that's more than just a case of parts. And make their decision based on features, performance reliability, support, brand, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomwhom
1) They don't have a $20k watch anymore
2) There is no "should" for 16 GB base to 32 GB. Many 16 GB users were fine with the memory, and many of them also used cloud services, through which there is no reason to have 32 GB memory...
3) Show me a tech company that doesn't care about profits over anything else, and I'll show you a unicorn.
4) As you could see browsing these forums, thinner and prettier sell laptops, as long as there are internals that will last 4+ years. Which all these new laptops will.
5) Ask any Watch user if it's gimmicky. There are 12+ million of them in the US alone, selling more watches first time around than iPhones first time around...
6) Until the car is released, there is no evidence to suggest it is a bad idea.
7) This profit-first mentality has worked for Apple for decades, as it has for every other company ever...

Apple under Jobs was about innovation first and profits will follow. Profit first mentality has got many companies in trouble. Unless Jobs was just BSing or you knew him personally he was always about innovation.

Now where is my unicorn.
 
Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower. ~ Steve Jobs.

Nice quote. But cynical in today's context. By now everybody knows that Apple isn't innovating anymore. The company still shovels in tons of money, but Apple is no longer the home of meaningful innovation.
 
Yup, not surprised. And not surprised with all the juvenile snark and hate, either. Par for the course here.

Apple manufactures a lot of what people want, people who are willing to open their wallet and purchase.

Though it will taper off past Christmas, Apple currently manufactures, sells, and delivers roughly 800,000 iPhones every day. Compare that to the meager 2.5 million Samsung Note 7 phones delivered in the first two weeks since their launch, before the fires and recall started.

The math is pretty straightforward...

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge had better sales in 2016 than iPhone 6s Plus and iPhone 7 Plus. I know it must be hard for you to understand...but sometimes you go to a store to buy the S7 Edge, and they simply tell you..they don't have it. If 100 million of Samsung users decided to skip Galaxy S8 and buy a middle spec Samsung J4 instead, Samsung can have them available in one week
 
Apple's 10-year plan: in 2026, they will sell just ten phones for $2 billion each and still have the highest margins.

Not far from the truth, more like:

"Get every sucker trapped in our ecosystem and gouge them if they want to stay"

Well.. it was fun but I'm not letting you take advantage of me anymore

BYE APPLE

IuCiBRT.gif
 
Nice quote. But cynical in today's context. By now everybody knows that Apple isn't innovating anymore. The company still shovels in tons of money, but Apple is no longer the home of meaningful innovation.
You mean the public beta tester. I'm glad you are not Tim Cook to show off every pipeline product to public to prove 'Apple so innovative!'.
 
Last edited:
You better check your maths; based on last quarter results, Apple sold around half oh what you claim per day, all models, globally. Not that it matters, but the Note 7 (one model) sold 2.5 million in approx 3 countries in 2 weeks. Now do your maths on Samsung, all models, globally?

I think my numbers are good. The bulk of Apple's 4th quarter sales, ending 9/24 and accounting for roughly 500K iPhones per day, were dominated by previous generation iPhones, sales of which leveled off considerably in that quarter in anticipation of the iPhone 7 release which occurred on 9/16. The iPhone 7 release brought daily numbers up to the higher level to meet customer demand. As I pointed out in my previous post, those numbers will level off after Christmas as demand subsides.

Also worth noting, Apple's guidance for Q1 2017 revenue is $76-78 billion, up substantially from their $46.9 billion from the last quarter. Seems things are looking good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tomwhom
Not far from the truth, more like:

"Get every sucker trapped in our ecosystem and gouge them if they want to stay"

Well.. it was fun but I'm not letting you take advantage of me anymore

BYE APPLE

IuCiBRT.gif
So naturally you should also bye Macrumors.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: fxmx
Apple under Jobs was about innovation first and profits will follow. Profit first mentality has got many companies in trouble. Unless Jobs was just BSing or you knew him personally he was always about innovation.

Now where is my unicorn.

What kinds of innovations do you think Jobs would have come up with if he was still here today?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomwhom
Oh wow. A lot of genius analysts on this thread. You should all get together and start a super duper company (and make it profitable also)!
 
  • Like
Reactions: username:
Right, yet many people would still buy the Apple ones, just because Apple tells us 3rd party dongles suck and uncertified. That would scare the average soccer moms and dads.
Depending on the stories, sometimes I buy Apple to guarantee they won't start a fire from skimping out on parts.
 
Says who?

How about, history?

How many products have had declining sales but maintained record breaking profits year after year... Forever? I can't think of any, how many can you think of?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.