I feel bad for the original poster. I looked into this, when I got my phone, and I did some math, and I knew overseas use would be almost impossible at those rates.
I'd be scared to turn it on. ha-ha.
I actually thought the fee was $0.015 per kb. So .005 is better than I thought.
600 MB sure is a lot of use. However, even if someone used 100 MB that would be $500 if the above story is true, so even that is crazy, and I couldn't afford that.
AT&T does need to offer an unlimited international plan like they do for blackberry.
Word travels fast over the internet...
AT&T just called and agreed to waive all charges due to the "miscommunication." I think they have a customer for life now!
Word travels fast over the internet...
AT&T just called and agreed to waive all charges due to the "miscommunication." I think they have a customer for life now!
Word travels fast over the internet...
AT&T just called and agreed to waive all charges due to the "miscommunication." I think they have a customer for life now!
I would call ATT and raise some serious hell about this (assuming you already haven't). There is no way they would get $3,000 out of me for some web browsing over seas. I know rules are rules but those are some s**** rules. I would have to get a lawyer or something involved with this.
jon
That's exactly what the phone rep quoted me: "point oh oh five cents per kay bee."
Well, if you're tech savvy at all you should have immediately started questioning the "kay bee" is it kilobits or kilobytes that is a factor of 8 difference in the price. At "point oh five cents" ($0.0005) per Kb you end up paying $4.96/MB. If it was KB then it's really $0.51/MB. Either one of these seems too low for your bill. If the rep really meant "point five cents" ($0.005) then it makes things more feasible at $49.60/MB if they were quoting bits rather than bytes the 'b' portion being upper or lower case can make a world of difference.
You're lucky that at&t decided to refund the charge since they were completely within their rights to be sticklers. They quoted you a rate, they charged you that rate, you didn't do enough homework to see how much that rate really would cost you before you started your internet usage. $0.45/minute overage charges don't sound like much until you make a call a few minutes before "nights and weekends" start and have a 2 hour phone call that costs $54.00 because you had none of your normal plan minutes left.
I do think that companies, when quoting data rates, should actually use a real world example. Instead of quoting $0.005/Kb, they should also tell you that "The Apple website is roughly 1 MB and will cost you $50 to access at this rate." so that an average non-techie person will have an idea of what they are getting themselves into.
I have a caveat emptor to top them all.
I purchased an iPhone on opening day to use in lieu of a cumbersome laptop while traveling in Ireland and England for two weeks in early July. AT&T promises "easy, affordable, and convenient plans" in their advertising... turns out I got two out of three.
On the way to the airport, I activated the per-use international roaming data plan - the only one offered to me. The rep quoted me $.005 per KB but did not disclose what that would translate to in layman's language (i.e., X amount per e-mail, X amount per web page, etc.). I'm a web developer as part of my career and I couldn't even tell you how many KB the average web page is, no less a text message to my son, an e-mail with a photo to my mother, or a quick check of Google Maps. That's part one of the trap. However, I now pay $40 per month for unlimited data usage on the iPhone, so really -- how much could it be? $100 at the most, right?