Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
but remember they might release this one... then a year later release a "remastered version" with longer battery life triple the HD and other little upgrades they had from the start to make hardcore apple lovers buy it again.

Sorry, but this thing should COMPLETELY replace my 4 year old 20GB iPod in terms of capacity. There's no excuse for less if you ask me. It should honestly have at least the capacity of the current top of the line iPod.
 
I am REALLY surprised that this is limited to Cingular users. What's even the point of spending so much time and money to create a revolutionary product if you are going to restrict half the market from being able to buy it?

The price is really high but I would still consider it if I could get it with Verizon. But the price obstacle and the carrier obstacle together are just too much.
 
I don't understand why there are any complaints about the capacity...it is called an iPhone not Ipod phone...I don't know of any other phone that has that amount of storage capacity. If you do let me know.
 
I'm gobsmacked by the innovation and design but a little dissappointed with the small memory, really not enough for me to chuck my QTEK PDA phone and sell my 60GB 'Pod.

I'll still buy one though because I can't stand Windows mobile and the iPhone happens to be the sexist looking PDA I've seen in my life. OSX on a PDA, WOW!

I guess we won't see a large capacity one in the near future because it would require too big a HDD.

And the best part of a year to save up :)
 
Sorry, but this thing should COMPLETELY replace my 4 year old 20GB iPod in terms of capacity. There's no excuse for less if you ask me. It should honestly have at least the capacity of the current top of the line iPod.

Then they would have had to use a HDD, which would have been heavier and made the phone thicker.
 
haha we were just saying
wouldnt it be funny if it had bootcamp so it could dual boot windows mobile?

:D
 
The iPhone is so revolutionary and amazing! It doesn't even look like a cell phone!! It is so sleek and sexy looking. I can't wait to see what the widescreen ipod and "revolutionary web device" is. Maybe an apple ultraportable?

It looks cool yeah. I hope the use of touchscreen only will feel good. However, design wise it kinda looks like my Nokia 6233... Except the fact that it is all screen of course. I don't understand the screen resolution. They say it is extremely high and it looks high, but then it reads 240 x 320 or something on Apples site - which is the same as my Nokia 6233. Strange. Another thing is, why doesn't it have GPS or at least the possibility? No mention of it.
 
I don't understand why there are any complaints about the capacity...it is called an iPhone not Ipod phone...I don't know of any other phone that has that amount of storage capacity. If you do let me know.
People are disappointed because they were promised an all-in-one device that combined the functions of a phone and mobile computer with that of a video ipod. The iphone is a lousy substitution for an ipod, so people are disappointed.

Another thing is, why doesn't it have GPS or at least the possibility? No mention of it.
Didn't the keynote say something about Google Maps indicating where you are?
 
is this phone 3g? didn't catch that in the specs. if the iphone doesn't have 3g it is definitely not worth buying the first gen. ill wait till the next rev. i also have my doubts about that on screen keyboard and browsing the web.
 
First: http://www.apple.com/iphone/

Read all that it is capable of--then comment. This thing does what every smartphone does...better. And it's OS X so no middle man products to help sync and take advantage of all the applications/ widgets that macs has--and will--offer.
This is revolutionary. And while 8gb seems small compared to a stand alone MP3 plyer it far exxceeds the smartphones available on the market today. And thats what you need to consider and compare to.
You'd be lucky to watch ONE movie on any other phone let alone add tv shows music and have room for other applications to run.
I do have a quibble with the Cingular choice. I was hoping for an unlocked phone--seeing as it'll be 2009 before any other carrier gets their hands on it. That means--for me--come June I'm dropping TMobile like a brick and switching. Unfortunate to have to pay that premium price point and the added cost of switching carriers. Oh well
 
I don't understand why there are any complaints about the capacity...it is called an iPhone not Ipod phone...I don't know of any other phone that has that amount of storage capacity. If you do let me know.

Because Jobs said a new music player, phone and way of getting on the net. While the iPhone is all that, it is hardly a full iPod substitute. How many more months of "COULD THIS BE THE NEW VIDEO IPOD?! [insert pics]" do we all need to go through?

The fact that it is locked to one carrier in the US is stupid as well, it would be like Apple saying "well...you can only use ADOBE software only with your Mac, switch to Adobe or piss off".

Oh well...new iPods next tuesday!!
 
unfortunately, iTV (which I have always wanted) just failed.

The iPhone is soooo impressive that it just killed the itv because it is competing for the mac fan's limited dollars. The average consumer doesnt have money to buy both.

- Doc

I am inclined to disagree. If a user can afford a $2500 plasma TV, $2000 a mac I highly doubt they will have trouble with a grand for both. The Apple TV was designed for widescreen, which is primarly HDTV. Methinks the intended market has plenty of money.
 
I don't understand the people who want a GSM phone and yet have CDMA service. There's a reason Apple went with GSM - they're introducing it to the rest of the world.

If you have large video, 8 GB is a problem. But looking at my library, I have 32 videos that take up 6.55 GB. I think 10 hours of video is enough for a device that does only 5 hours of playback.

But Cingular. That's just bad no matter how you look at it. :D
 
Why the tight integration with Yahoo?

Anyone have a theory as to the tight integration with Yahoo? Yahoo! Of all companies, why Yahoo? More to the point, why not Google (given an owner is on Apple's board)?

Actually, why tie so closely with any so-called content provider? I want to be sure I'm fairly independent as to IMAP servers and whatnot.

The Yahoo business strikes me as a little odd.

I'm pretty blown away though. My one little quibble is with the 2 MP camera. I do hope they upgrade that to a 3 MP camera by June. And this feature request may have to wait for v2.0, but wouldn't built-in GPS be cool?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.