I'm worried by that statement, I planned to que for my iphone on launch. But if we're only getting minimal shipment here in Japan, I may wait.
Perhaps the figure of $214.6 includes VAT (or its Japanese analogue).So much for the $199 US MAX Jobs said at WWDC.
First of all, are you willing to pay AT&T the penalty for terminating your contract early? (By the way, when calculating how much the iPhone will cost you, don't forget that AT&T will charge $36 to activate it.) Second of all, you'll have to rely on the hacker community to unlock a U.S. iPhone. They've been successful with the first-generation iPhone, but you should wait and see how they fare with the iPhone 3G rather than getting one on July 11.Will the iPhone3G sold here in the US work with Japanese carriers? I'm military, likely to be stationed in Japan next year. But there isnt' much point in my buying an iPhone this year if I can't even use the thing 12 months from now.
I don't know where you heard that, but it isn't true at all. At least not in Tokyo - they were showing the original iPhone on TV and every one of the morning show people were oohing and ahhing about it. In my own experience, when I show people my Touch, I get the same reaction - people clamoring to touch the screen and zoom in on pics, etc. It's going to be big here, especially once people see it in action.Plus when the iphone first came out the japanese reaction was just "so?"
The standalone UK price for the iPhone isn't too bad at all actually. It may seem expensive if you're used to buying your typical cheap Pay As You Go phone or buying a phone on contract (where the handset cost is subsidised).
I dont think the iphone is ready for japan. They love cameras and the iphone has minimal camera features and a really bad camera to boot (its a good camera by US standards but their phones rival normal digital cameras). Plus when the iphone first came out the japanese reaction was just "so?" If the iphone hasnt taken off in Europe yet how on earth can it take off in Japan?
And can the iphone read these things?
![]()
It seems like the japanese live off of scanning those things with their phones. Those codes are on literally everything, signs, websites, food, tv shows... everything.
The iphone just doesnt have what it takes for the japanese lifestyle. If they "evaporate" right away something tells me it wont be a very big shipment.
And can the iphone read these things?
![]()
i live on kyushu and maybe it's just me, but the credit keitai aren't able to be used where i actually shop yet. maybe they're everywhere in tokyo
Not too shabby unless you consider the fact that the $70 monthly fee includes no free minutes for voice calls - sure, calls to other Softbank subscribers are free at certain times of the day (from 1am to 9pm), but calls to any other phone in Japan are billed at about $0.40 per minute. No free nights and weekends, etc. Not too shabby? It's NOT EVEN CLOSE to what you guys in the States are getting. Not by a long shot.
Also, existing customers are getting shafted BIG TIME. As I posted in another thread, I just got off the phone with a Softbank customer service rep after inquiring about my account, and my upgrade eligibility. I am 12 months into a two year contract (actually a 27 month contract due to a bit of trickery on Softbank's part) ... My early termination fee will be $450! However, the fun doesn't stop there. Even though I will pay that ETF, I will not qualify for subsidized pricing on the iPhone, as I have not yet been a customer for the full 24 months. I was told that final pricing has not yet been decided, but for other phones, the subsidy in my situation is generally half of what it would be if I were a new customer. WTH??!!
So, to summarize: if you're an existing customer on a contract, you will have to pay a hefty ETF, but will still not qualify for new customer pricing on the iPhone, even though you'll sign a new 24 (actually, 27) month contract for it. The only way to get the 'new customer' pricing is to pay the exorbitant ETF and get a new phone number.
****ing crooks. Am I the only one that sees anything wrong with this picture?!![]()
So, to summarize: if you're an existing customer on a contract, you will have to pay a hefty ETF, but will still not qualify for new customer pricing on the iPhone, even though you'll sign a new 24 (actually, 27) month contract for it. The only way to get the 'new customer' pricing is to pay the exorbitant ETF and get a new phone number.
****ing crooks. Am I the only one that sees anything wrong with this picture?!![]()
Because of the change in money sharing between Apple and phone companies they (phone co.) are now really taking the p**s with this and as usual its the existing customers that get shafted. This isn't anything new i suppose as i had this problem with a basic upgrade a few years ago with O2, its all about getting new people tied down to a 18 month contract and sod the existing customers.:mad
Not at all. I think this time around Apple has really messed up and i can see them getting a lot of bad publicity with the 3G. Because of the change in money sharing between Apple and phone companies they (phone co.) are now really taking the p**s with this and as usual its the existing customers that get shafted. This isn't anything new i suppose as i had this problem with a basic upgrade a few years ago with O2, its all about getting new people tied down to a 18 month contract and sod the existing customers.![]()
Existing iPhone users can upgrade for free in some cases. Its going to cost me £59 to upgrade from an 8GB iPhone to the 16GB iPhone 3G. Thats GOOD. You can't blame Apple for O2 shafting their own customers using other phones. Thats O2s decision and solely O2s decision. Apple would gladly have those customers on board.
Where apple screwed up was by leaving exclusivity in place - you could always get around the new customer/existing customer difference by switching carriers regularly - I've been on them all now more than once. With the iphone you're stuck with the one carrier.
OTOH O2 are allowing existing iphone owners to upgrade within their 18 month contract for free so they're at least trying.
Ideal for me would be a payG iphone with a Simplicity SIM in it. £7.50/mo cheaper than the iphone contract and no minimum term. It remains to be seen whether O2 allow that kind of thing though. Thinking about it though calculating at that saving it'd take 36 months to make up the price difference (or to put it another way, on those figures iphone costs £235 including subsidy).
For the record i wasn't saying Apple is shafting their customers, im say O2 is! O2 cares more for getting new customers then keeping their old ones. I've been with O2 for 5 years and everytime i try and upgrade its a hassle. I just cant be arsed with changing my number again! But yes, you're right you can just change carrier but i think thats one of the reasons they don't care for existing customers as they know they've got them for a minimum of 18 months and after that they know they'll probably go off to someone else.
What you have to remember is that they have subsidised you when you take out a new contract with a cut price or free phone. The only way they can make money on you as a customer is if you honour the life of the contract or at least 90% of it.
What you are asking for is essentially for O2 to lose money by letting you upgrade to the iPhone early. Its not that they dont care about their customers, more that they just don't want to lose money on them. And at the end of the day you did sign up to the contract.
I understand its frustrating for existing users to see new users get good deals, but when you think about it, it makes perfect sense. They aren't looking to lose money.
What you have to remember is that they have subsidised you when you take out a new contract with a cut price or free phone. The only way they can make money on you as a customer is if you honour the life of the contract or at least 90% of it.
What you are asking for is essentially for O2 to lose money by letting you upgrade to the iPhone early. Its not that they dont care about their customers, more that they just don't want to lose money on them. And at the end of the day you did sign up to the contract.
I understand its frustrating for existing users to see new users get good deals, but when you think about it, it makes perfect sense. They aren't looking to lose money.