Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m not sure if the forum will wreck the quality of these, but they were taken using RAW on my 14 Pro, then the details found in Lightroom.

No fancy lenses, no special lighting, just capturing my girls living out their lives on our vacation. These cameras are an absolute gift to us all.
Great photos, also remember to take videos. We cherish the videos we have of our kids at younger age and have watched those regularly over the years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artifex
Apple needs to make an iPhone Ultra, where the camera alone costs Apple $1000 to make, and the whole phone itself has to be sold for $5,000. Market it to photography and videography professionals, but really it'd be the ultimate status symbol and wishlist for 90% of teens and young people in the country. Spending $5,000 on a phone would be the ultimate flex. Still keep the Pro and regular phones around at the same price range they are now, with the Pro phones still having among top of class camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uacd
Great photos, also remember to take videos. We cherish the videos we have of our kids at younger age and have watched those regularly over the years.
I do too, lots of live photos.
I'm upgrading the phone this year to capture the Depth videos as well. When the Apple headset, or other headsets can play them back I can only imagine the joy at seeing them so little and being transported back to that exact moment.
 
Is this limited to iPhone users living in the USA or available to iPhone users worldwide? How does one join or submit an entry?
 
As someone who photographs mostly in BW, that BW winner is just horrendous. Firstly, there is nothing interesting about the composition - this is an easy enough shot to get at any Aquarium. Second, the processing and everything about it is horrendous. Yes, this is about taste, and some things like HDR are to each his own taste, but I just can't see anybody thinking this is a good image?
I was absolutely baffled at that photo. It sucks. It looks like it was posted on Facebook by your aunt after the child in the photo showed her how to add post processing in a free iOS app. What a shameful selection for winner.

Edit to say, many of the winning photos in this competition are great. I love them. But the grand prize winner and the first place in the Animals category are just bonkers. They’re so over processed they look like absolute amateur photoshop junk and this organization chose this trash? Unreal.

Look at the first place photo for Animals. It had such an insanely boosted Clarity that you see are dark border around all the animals and it looks terrible. I hate this.
 
Last edited:
Damn I would have participated for sure! I took some really neat photos in the last year.

Here's one that's a bit boring but I like it because it would have been really hard capturing with a DSLR. Took it with my 14 Pro.
IMG_2762.jpeg
 
I’m not sure if the forum will wreck the quality of these, but they were taken using RAW on my 14 Pro, then the details found in Lightroom.

No fancy lenses, no special lighting, just capturing my girls living out their lives on our vacation. These cameras are an absolute gift to us all.

These are infinitely better than the "winners". The editing on those are atrocious.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ds2000
As someone who photographs mostly in BW, that BW winner is just horrendous. Firstly, there is nothing interesting about the composition - this is an easy enough shot to get at any Aquarium. Second, the processing and everything about it is horrendous. Yes, this is about taste, and some things like HDR are to each his own taste, but I just can't see anybody thinking this is a good image?
Yeah, maybe that's what's bothering me about it...
 
I wish I’d seen an actual exhibition of Richard Avedon. Standing in front of life size photographs of In The American West was apparently unnerving and exhilarating at the same time. His full frame portraits are something else. I think my favs are Ansel Adams, particularly for his use of filters and how it changed photography. Margaret Bourke-White (I had one of her originals in my hands at the Art Gallery in South Australia) and it was awe-inspiring to see first hand the depth of shades in Black & White prints. It basically started a series that I exhibited. But also Cartier-Brasson in the Decisive Moment. There are so many tbh. Dorothy Lange is also a good choice. How does one choose?

Years ago, before Avedon passed away in 2004, I saw an In the American West exhibition at Stanford's Cantor Arts Center. I was blown away by his portraits - they were huge (maybe 4-6' in height?) attached to a metal backing. And were incredibly engaging. From that I eventually found a used copy of his book In the American West.

It was that exhibition and book that moved me to wanting to hit up random strangers in San Francisco, in different neighborhoods, for some conversation and making a couple of portraits. I haven't counted them, but I'd guess I have around a thousand of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: katbel
Hard to say anything positive about these shots. So over-processed it’s laughable. Absolutely No compositional skills. They certainly do nothing to promote the photography attributes of an iPhone. I enter many international photo competitions (and have won or placed in several) and these would not even get past round 1.They are bordering on embarrassing.
 
Great photos, also remember to take videos. We cherish the videos we have of our kids at younger age and have watched those regularly over the years.
I've started taking Spatial Videos occasionally, especially of my kid. I don't have an Apple Vision Pro and have no plans to get one -- but I could see in the future being glad I have some moments from her younger years captured this way.
 
In response to all of the unfortunate negative comments up above...

I applaud anyone going out with their camera, especially with an iPhone (the only camera I use today), and making photographs.

Hat tip to all who entered the competition - you're all winners in my book and have my respect!
 
I was absolutely baffled at that photo. It sucks. It looks like it was posted on Facebook by your aunt after the child in the photo showed her how to add post processing in a free iOS app. What a shameful selection for winner.

Edit to say, many of the winning photos in this competition are great. I love them. But the grand prize winner and the first place in the Animals category are just bonkers. They’re so over processed they look like absolute amateur photoshop junk and this organization chose this trash? Unreal.

Look at the first place photo for Animals. It had such an insanely boosted Clarity that you see are dark border around all the animals and it looks terrible. I hate this.
The black and white photo is amazing to me because it looks like an illustration pulled from a textbook or children's storybook from the 60s or 70s. There is nothing digitally photographic about it except that it couldn't be accomplished any other way. The composition is also great. We cannot see the boy's expression but that does not stop us from seeing it in our mind's eye. We know exactly what is going on in the photo because it looks both familiar and otherworldly at the same time. It's not particularly beautiful nor intricate but does convey a lot of life. Not sure if it deserves a grand prize, but I didn't judge all of the photos so I'm in no position to place them in any kind of order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Well it is a sign of bad tone to judge someone’s photo style but thats definitely not my cup of beer. Maybe there is some hidden meaning which I don’t get right, I dunno.

There are so many talented people posting their shots on Macrumors in monthly photos thread and even here in the comments, somehow Apple unfortunately does not lurk here to chose their shots
 
Apple needs to make an iPhone Ultra, where the camera alone costs Apple $1000 to make, and the whole phone itself has to be sold for $5,000. Market it to photography and videography professionals, but really it'd be the ultimate status symbol and wishlist for 90% of teens and young people in the country. Spending $5,000 on a phone would be the ultimate flex. Still keep the Pro and regular phones around at the same price range they are now, with the Pro phones still having among top of class camera.
For that price it must be Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in California
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UliBaer
Yep pretty much. These competitions tend to be more about who can cake on the most layers of post processing in a combination that looks good.
You could get to the same end point with the same starting photo taken by any half decent phone from the last decade.
Literally this🤣
Slap an Instagram filter, here you go as a winner of Apple contest
 
  • Like
Reactions: AAPLGeek
I'd also add Richard Avedon, particularly his work in his In the American West project. Also Daido Moriyama, Manuel Alvarez Bravo, Dorothea Lange, Robert Capa, Sally Mann, Graciela Iturbide, Elliot Erwitt, and Garry Winogrand.
Lewis Hine belongs in there somewhere, probably next to Dorothea Lange.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.