I am truly amazed at how all of the people that have posted intelligent arguments defending the price cuts and bashing the "whiners" fail to address all of the issues here. While I am an early adopter of new tech gadgets, I have none of the allegiance to Apple which may have motivated many to purchase. I fully understand the consequences of early adoption. Here are a few points that don't get consistently addressed.
1. The reason I am ticked (not so much tonight) is that this price cut didn't pass a simple lithmus test: Given the opportunity to have the iPhone for 69 days "early" for $200, would I have done it? The answer is a clear "hell no"!
2. People seem to think that you can't have believed the iPhone was worth $600 and still be pissed. BS. Just because I was willing to pay $600 doesn't mean I would not have preferred paying $400.
3. The timing is almost unprecedented. 69 days?! For most other tech, the whole month of September would still be considered the "early adoption" period. I love all the weak examples of other products depreciating over entire years. This was 2 months! Clearly a simple case of too much too soon.
Overall, I'm still happy with the phone, but Apple may have done irreparable damage. I wonder if potential iPod Touch buyers will pause for 2 months before they take the plunge?
Isn't it possible that they are getting huge discounts now from Hon Hai (the actual manufacturer of the iPhone). The new sales volumes for an iPod that has the features of the iPhone without the phone is perfect since it can sell into every market on the planet, rather than just the USA.
The touch screen, the memory, some chassis parts, etc. All will now be far higher quantity, which drives the fixed costs way down.
I doubt it's $200.00, but it's probably a good chunk. The flexibility of the higher volume certainly let them drop the price somewhat.
Just a thought.