Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's iOS products are in a weird place where you have devices with a range of prices, but the more expensive products aren't necessarily much more capable than the lowest priced products. Outside of certain photography features, this SE will be as capable of a phone as the Pro models
 
If past SE launches are any guide, the iPhone 14 will likely be discontinued once the new SE 4 comes out. When the original iPhone SE launched in March 2016, the iPhone 5S on which it was largely based was discontinued. When the second generation iPhone SE launched in April 2020, the iPhone 8 on which it was largely based was discontinued.
True.

But I was also thinking about retail and carriers.

Has to lead to same crazy discounts on most iPhones (besides 16/16 Pro/Max).

This SE is about to shake things up!
 
Still wish it could’ve done with a mini design, or at least a iPhone X design
Seriously, I'd take a not-maxi size iPhone if they won't make a mini.

The take the iPhone X/XS/11's 5.8" screen size with today's smaller bezels and that would still be a pretty mini phone compared to the 6.3"+ ever increasing sizes today.

Instead we get thinner! giant phones.
 
What do you mean?
I guess they’re referring to people with compromised immune systems can’t walk out in public without wearing a face mask.

Face ID can’t be used if you’re constantly covering up most of your face.

I guess Apple needs to implement some of the iris scanning tech they use in AVP for the next generation of Face ID.

But, obviously, that tech won’t debut in an iPhone SE. And maybe we won’t ever see something like that on iPhone at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paddle1
I didn't realize until recently the iPhone I've been using since 2018, an XR, has an Intel modem.
Haven't really noticed any issues with it

But I did with mine back in the day

 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
I guess they’re referring to people with compromised immune systems can’t walk out in public without wearing a face mask.

Face ID can’t be used if you’re constantly covering up most of your face.

I guess Apple needs to implement some of the iris scanning tech they use in AVP for the next generation of Face ID.

But, obviously, that tech won’t debut in an iPhone SE. And maybe we won’t ever see something like that on iPhone at all.

I'm at a food stall in the middle of a bright sunny day in a crowded market, a nice wide-brimmed shade hat, I have the scalding hot plate of Gozlame in one hand, I don't have two more hands to juggle sunglasses and phone, so anything eye / face based is pretty much off the table as a sustainable option.

TouchID really is a wheelchair-ramp-level assistive technology / affordance for a significant section of the community (folks with autoimmune disorders, cancer patients, organ transplant recipients etc).

Even without the payment aspect, just being able to unlock the phone around other people, without having to type out a passcode.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dave559
Well, that's it for Apple offering a phone that immunosuppressed folks can use to do payments in-store.
Apparently Face ID works with a mask:

From: https://support.apple.com/en-ca/102452

With iOS 15.4 or later, you can use Face ID with a mask to unlock your iPhone while wearing a mask.

If you're wearing a face mask or potentially other face coverings, Face ID with a mask can analyze the unique characteristics around your eyes. When using Face ID with a mask, you can still use Face ID to authenticate apps, unlock your iPhone, and use Apple Pay.

This feature is available on iPhone 12 and later with iOS 15.4 or later.

Apparently you can also "add up to four pairs of glasses with Face ID."
 
I can afford a 16 Pro. The reason I own and use an SE is that I like the size, the rounded edges, and the home button. So, if they make the new SE bigger and with FaceId, then there will be no reason for me to buy it, because in that case I might as well buy the top of the line, no need to settle for the lowest-end model. I bought the lowest-end model because it was special. If it isn't special anymore, then why should I?
For me, no TouchId, no buy. I will keep my current SE forever. Maybe I'll buy another one while I still can, to have a backup in case this one dies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattspace
Still using an XS because I can’t stand the godawful camera bump on the back. Been waiting for the SE4 to have face ID, USBC, and no giant bump. Fingers crossed.

Would have paid a premium for a 16 with no bump, but will gladly pay less for this.
 
Go stand in an Apple Store and ask 99.9% of consumers if they know the difference between an intel and Qualcomm modem in their phone.

They’ll have no idea wtf you’re talking about. People on this forum forget they’re not Apple’s main customers. Especially of the SE.
Absolutely, 100% true: iPhone or smartphones at large, the average consumer goes for what's immediately obvious and tangible.

That includes things like display size, phone size, display brightness/quality, price, etc.

The average buyer will (rightly) assume everything is just going to work and not think about who made the modem in their new smartphone.

I'd even bet that almost none of them have even thought about there being any kind of modems inside their smartphones as it's neither a component they get to touch or see, nor is it a spec that one can upgrade at purchase, like storage or RAM.

Suggesting that anyone buying an iPhone thinks about the modem is frighteningly out of touch. The number of people considering this spec is so low it might as well be exactly zero (even if it technically isn't).

I also still don't get this narrative of Apple shipping SE 4 with a terrible modem as the costs associated with the inevitable replacements and repairs and recalls and (potential) lawsuits/settlements are far larger than Apple just spending more money on making a great modem for SE 4 and shipping it with that.

Yes, they've done it in the past. But you guys really don't think Apple wants to minimize losses and optimize future products to avoid more losses?

SE 4 isn't going to blow anyone away on performance and high-end specs. But it'll be a very solid product at a great price, once of the best value/$ SEs ever, I have no doubt.
 
Absolutely, 100% true: iPhone or smartphones at large, the average consumer goes for what's immediately obvious and tangible.

That includes things like display size, phone size, display brightness/quality, price, etc.

The average buyer will (rightly) assume everything is just going to work and not think about who made the modem in their new smartphone.

I'd even bet that almost none of them have even thought about there being any kind of modems inside their smartphones as it's neither a component they get to touch or see, nor is it a spec that one can upgrade at purchase, like storage or RAM.

Suggesting that anyone buying an iPhone thinks about the modem is frighteningly out of touch. The number of people considering this spec is so low it might as well be exactly zero (even if it technically isn't).

I also still don't get this narrative of Apple shipping SE 4 with a terrible modem as the costs associated with the inevitable replacements and repairs and recalls and (potential) lawsuits/settlements are far larger than Apple just spending more money on making a great modem for SE 4 and shipping it with that.

Yes, they've done it in the past. But you guys really don't think Apple wants to minimize losses and optimize future products to avoid more losses?

SE 4 isn't going to blow anyone away on performance and high-end specs. But it'll be a very solid product at a great price, once of the best value/$ SEs ever, I have no doubt.
Yup.

Short of doing a speed test I don’t think you’ll be able to tell the difference.

As someone who reads this site and follows tech I use an iPhone 13 mini. I only remember the other week that it’s not a “pro” phone 🤣
 
I still think Apple is going to have a hard time justifying the $300 difference between the SE 4 and iPhone 16. An extra camera (most people aren't using), camera control button (not going to say much more here but... mehh). Outside of this? Internals are going to be the exact same. I just don't see it.

Comparing the rumored SE 4 vs iPhone 16
- Essentially same frame
- same CPU
- same RAM
- same base 128GB storage
- same Apple Intelligence
- same screen and paltry 60hz refresh
- more than likely very similar battery life
- Notch vs Dynamic Island
- Apple Modem vs Qualcomm (too early to tell)
- camera button (not really the needle mover for most people)
- extra camera (i'd be willing to bet most people aren't using - and if you are, you bought the Pro/Max)


This basically says Dynamic Island, Camera Button, and extra camera most people don't use is worth $300 more?? Am I missing something?
Base storage could still be 64GB
Modem - Apple
Modem w/out mmWave
Maybe no magsafe
 
  • Like
Reactions: macdaddy43
Base storage could still be 64GB
Modem - Apple
Modem w/out mmWave
Maybe no magsafe
- No chance base storage is 64GB
- We don't exactly know how the Apple modem performs, the goal would be for nobody to even notice
- no mmWave - possible, that's a good point
- no magsafe - also possible. I would find it shocking that they would omit magsafe from this, but certainly possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309
- No chance base storage is 64GB
- We don't exactly know how the Apple modem performs, the goal would be for nobody to even notice
- no mmWave - possible, that's a good point
- no magsafe - also possible. I would find it shocking that they would omit magsafe from this, but certainly possible.
Well, maybe only a few more days to find out ;)
 
  • Love
Reactions: macdaddy43
It may just be wishful thinking, but I don't see the logic of making the SE just another more expensive all-screen FaceID phone, when they already have that device in the range - it's last year's (and the year before's) standard models.

iPhone 16 is the current model. iPhone 15, and 14 are still on sale new from Apple (and they're on the long tail of low production costs from established production lines). Where does a non-TouchID all-screen iPhone SE fit in that strategy?

Keeping those old flagship phones in production for several generations is part of amortising the cost of developing them.

The more I think about it, the more I think the FaceID / all screen SE sounds like the "Apple television" which Mossberg (I think) kept pushing as a certain thing. Apple knows TouchID is a selling point, and that the market for the SE isn't just people who can't afford (but really want) a FaceID phone.

Thinking about the headphone jack as an analogy - I don't recall Apple making the headphone jack on the iPhone 5 style SE a marketing point "The headphone jack you know and love". And yet...

touchid.png


The option that makes the most sense to me, would be they keep the current form-factor, albeit swapping lightning to USB-C, but replace the large top bezel with an iPhone 14-style notch for camera and speaker (notably without FaceID to save costs and preserve range segmentation), to sneak in a bit more screen space, without increasing the size of the device.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.