Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
couldn't care less. if i do heavy traffic things i use my wifi at home. a real difference when browsing the web or watching videos will not be noticeable.
 
http://bgr.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-vs-galaxy-note-8-lte-speed-test-its-not-even-close/

Above you can see the tests plain and simple it may be nice, have a nice display and all. But due to various lawsuits against Qualcomm. The iPhone X just doesn't have the best Radio chipset for LTE data it simply fails at being a phone when you need it period.
My speed tests have been regularly faster than my previous iPhone, which is good enough for me.

Generally my speeds are limited by network congestion anyway, so I never approach the theoretical maximum speeds.
 
For my phone, peak LTE throughput is zero concern. Nothing larger than a few meg ever gets downloaded on LTE anyway. Anything larger is reserved for WiFi to protect data cap.

I find user experience doesn’t really start diminishing unless I’m under 4-5 meg. Anything above that is gravy so while it’s nice to crank out higher, I’m not worried about.

For the record AT&T hovers around 20-50 on LTE in my area throughout the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eagleglen
I think that buyers need to have all the infirmation before buying. For example in a fringe remote area because the iPhine X has slow neutered LTE Radio a person in need may not have a strong signal or data when they need it in a critical time.

http://bgr.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-speed-test-att-vs-t-mobile-qualcomm-vs-intel/amp/

You say buyers need all the information before buying, but you completely ignored this part of the article;

Before diving into the results, it’s worth keeping two important things in mind. First, these results aren’t conclusive: the data only measures speed, not variables like location, cell signal, or LTE bands, and the sample size is still small, as the phone hasn’t even been out for two weeks yet. The author of the report says that “an admittedly small number of speed tests have been taken with the iPhone X compared to other iPhone models,” so don’t go jumping to any conclusions just yet.

I'd say claiming the phone will fail someone in a remote area because of a difference in modems falls under jumping to conclusions.
 
I think that buyers need to have all the infirmation before buying. For example in a fringe remote area because the iPhine X has slow neutered LTE Radio a person in need may not have a strong signal or data when they need it in a critical time.

http://bgr.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-speed-test-att-vs-t-mobile-qualcomm-vs-intel/amp/

funny cause they say the intel modem is faster. you will never notice the difference

Provisional testing from SpeedSmart, a company that crowdsources speedtests from individual users through an app, shows that there is a small but real difference in speeds between the Intel and Qualcomm versions of the iPhone X, even when they’re on the same network. The catch is that it’s Intel’s modem, which is regarded to be behind Qualcomm’s in many respects, that turns out to be faster.
 
gigabit lte isnt even a thing yet. why would they include it? it'll be 18 months or so before it really start to be rolled out. by then the new iphone will be out and probably support it
Yes it is, T-Mobile has gigabit LTE deployed in 430 markets.
Let me know when I can regularly get speeds over 600mbps down from a cellular company and this will then be an issue.

I am surprised TheRealAlex hasn't been posting more material given to him from sammy.
This isn't about getting gigabit speeds, it's about efficiency. Basically if you're in an area that has gigabit LTE deployed and you are getting 5Mbps down due to congestion, someone with a Note 8 is likely to get 10Mbps down since it has 4x4 MIMO.
 
This isn't about getting gigabit speeds, it's about efficiency. Basically if you're in an area that has gigabit LTE deployed and you are getting 5Mbps down due to congestion, someone with a Note 8 is likely to get 10Mbps down since it has 4x4 MIMO.

This is the correct answer.

Most posters don't seem to understand Gigabit LTE is not about gigabit speeds, it's about increasing real-world throughput. Gigabit LTE is designed to give much better average throughput in average signal conditions.

802.11ac wasn't designed to provide gigabit speeds, it was meant to provide 200-300 Mbps throughput in homes and basements. Gigabit LTE serves the same purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geoff5093
I have an iPhone X (Intel) and an LG V30 (Qualcomm).

The LG V30 gets LTE data speeds much faster than the iPhone X, in the same place with the same signal.

I have also noticed that in areas with a very poor signal, the LG V30 can use data and make a phone call, whereas the iPhone X will not work at all.

In most ways the iPhone X is a wonderful device, but it is easy for me to say that it is not perfect.
 
gigabit lte isnt even a thing yet. why would they include it? it'll be 18 months or so before it really start to be rolled out. by then the new iphone will be out and probably support it

The thing is that the technology isn't just about faster theoretical speeds on a future network but the way it manages signal in areas where it's weak or the area is congested. It appears that phones with the tech perform better *today* than those without it.
 
http://bgr.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-vs-galaxy-note-8-lte-speed-test-its-not-even-close/

Above you can see the tests plain and simple it may be nice, have a nice display and all. But due to various lawsuits against Qualcomm. The iPhone X just doesn't have the best Radio chipset for LTE data it simply fails at being a phone when you need it period.
I can't think of any attribute of a smartphone that might matter less today than max LTE performance.

But hey, at least the Note 8 doesn't suck at everything by comparison. Just everything people actually use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aevan
I think that buyers need to have all the infirmation before buying. For example in a fringe remote area because the iPhine X has slow neutered LTE Radio a person in need may not have a strong signal or data when they need it in a critical time.

http://bgr.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-speed-test-att-vs-t-mobile-qualcomm-vs-intel/amp/


The speed won’t necessarily affect ones ability to use your phone in an emergency.

Well I’ll be slightly more specific, it doesn’t, at all. What’s important there is reception and that’s not necessarily tethered to the speed of the signal.

For instance, in normal day to day use can you guess the speed of my phone? Nope? Me either and I’m not interested. All of the website I visit load in the blinking of an eye. Apps download ridiculously fast and when I do the occasional Remote Desktop session, it’s fast and works without issue.

I could go on, but the point is, whatever speed my phone is, it’s certainly fast enough for me and has been for years.

However, when I go up to the north of Scotland for some hillwalking as I do often. There’s always the risk of having an accident. Some of the hills and mountains are treacherous, there’s a real risk of a landslide or rockfalls and so on.

While I’m well prepared you also run the risk of getting caught in unexpected severe weather conditions which can be life threatening.

Why am I babbling on about this? Because even up in the middle of nowhere my network (and a couple of others) still have almost blanket coverage with the old 2G network.

That ancient but very useful network has a theoretical data speed of 0.1Mbit. In reality, you get nowhere near that. It is all but useless for data.

However, what it is very good for is making phone calls and sending texts, which in an emergency or crisis as you say, is really all you need. After all it’s a hell of a lot quicker and more efficient to phone any form of emergency services or to contact anyone you need to in a crisis than it is to send them an email or visit their website.

Fast data is great, the majority of us probably already have more than we need (not that we’ll complain if it gets faster, looking at you 5g) but it is by no means essential for a crisis situation.

If you’re concerned about that kind of thing then you should really be looking for the network with the best coverage on all generations of mobile signal and prioritising that over the speed of your data.


...... (And yes, for those who know me, clearly my medication has kicked in, lectures are in full swing :D)
 
Oh really???

1ca5c2662b6517fc7cee18c592b015e3.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: JaisHTX
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.