For example - reverse our current model. If I have a 64GB laptop, why not have all my data on the 220GB iPod, and when I connect it it syncs a subset of that to my computer. ie: my computer has a few photos and music but most resides on the iPod.
I'll give you three reasons. BACKUP, BACKUP and BACKUP.
There is no way to backup your complete collection except from the desktop. Unless Apple starts to allow users to download a song more than once, you can forget about that model ever happening.
Anyone who keeps all their music, especially 150GB worth on just their iPod is insane.
Nooooo! It's the only iPod I use. So easy to navigate without even looking a it. And, I can use it with gloves on....
Do you seriously think the classic would be cheaper if Apple replaced the hard drive with flash memory?![]()
Like who listens to over 100 GB of music?
This probably covers a small percentage of audience, maybe 0.0001%...
The nano line will end before the classic.
You have no idea. It is already flash memory.![]()
Do you have reading issues? I just said that the flash memory is cheaper today than it was in 2006.
How easy is it to navigate though that much music to find something? That's the reason I have been staying with the Nano's.
do we have to cite profanely named sources? Macrumors is starting to go down the tubes...
Who is the Classic relevant for these days anyway?
I was trying to think why I might want one, and couldn't come up with anything...
You can also argue that the Nano is using a variation of iOS, though a very skimmed version, as it uses multi-touch now and the same GUI.