It's awful. And who the hell are iRiver!?
About as trustworthy name as Archos and the like!!
Originally posted by mac15
including the opticla out but thats on the dock with the ipod.
Originally posted by crapple33
umm, i'd have to agree with you about archos. i got a mp3 player from them and it broke three times after being sent in for replacements. i finally gave up.
but iriver is a high quality company. their cd/mp3 players are generally considered best on the market. and the other main cd/mp3 player company, rio, blatantly copies all of the iriver designs.
but the ipod is still better.
Originally posted by bennetsaysargh
i think i'll be throwing iRiver into the nearest river if i have to use it. it looks ugly, and also not as much storage as the iPod. probably will take forever to load music on there. no iTunes AAC support. my 15GB iPod is better. it wouldn't be smal enough to snea during study hall, and probably won't fit in my pocket.
cool remote though😀
Um, why excactly are mac users limited to usb? What about firewire, as all current macs posses this.Originally posted by melchior
for most mac users, usb 1.1 is their only option and that would be slow. for most windows users, usb 2.0 is fast and quite satisfactory. so what if you can't bus power it.
Originally posted by melchior
ummm, it's almost exactly the same dimensions as the new iPod's. (almost)
and it has a FULLY FUNCTIONAL REMOTE with and LCD... you can stick it whereever you like.
does that sound rude? 😀
what happens when you have more music than 15gb on your current ipod? will you buy a 30gb iPod? 😱 or manually organise your playlist?
for most mac users, usb 1.1 is their only option and that would be slow. for most windows users, usb 2.0 is fast and quite satisfactory. so what if you can't bus power it.
Originally posted by nef919
Um, why excactly are mac users limited to usb? What about firewire, as all current macs posses this.
Originally posted by dethl
What happens when you fill the iRiver up? Seeing how they only have a 10gig model...if you can replace the internal hard drive...then I could see.
USB 2.0 might be fine and dandy for windoze users, but I like my firewire alot better, and bus powering is an awesome feature. I can charge and sync in the same cable....this makes portabliity much more so. All USB2 products need an external adapter...thats not cool. I'm sure firewire was created with portability in mind. Also, I hear firewire is much faster than USB2, even though its an older standard (and firewire 2/800 blows usb2 away).
Originally posted by barkmonster
With all the noise they made about napster, I find it pretty funny that a metallica track is being played in a promo shot for an mp3 player!!!
Originally posted by melchior
what happens when you fill the iPod. can you replace the internal hard drive? no. if you 27gig of music, maybe you will be happy with a 30gig ipod. when you have 30.1gig of music then it doesn't matter if it's 10gig or 30gig.
i don't think it's useful for a music player. not when we are talking about 'portability' on the other hand firewire is better............i think, when it comes to music players, bus power doesn't matter. but i have a feeling we are just going to disagree on this. 😎
Originally posted by Foxer
I want to say it sucks, but it actually looks OK. Key would be the ease-of-use, since iPod nailed that requirement as well. I really like the remote, even though I never quite understood the point of remotes for something that you've probably got in your pocket. A wireless remote would be nicer, since I've been known to hook up my iPod to my creature speakers when I work in my garage - that would give me the abilty to control from a distance.
Originally posted by andrewlandry
i'm really surprised that Sony hasn't come up with some real competition for the iPod. i bet they could actually make something cool. who would have thought that the walkman for the 21st century would be made by Apple.