Drives me crazy.. I could handle losing a 27" screen if I could have 32GB of RAM. The Mac Mini goes up to 64..
But the Mini has its tradeoffs too.
Drives me crazy.. I could handle losing a 27" screen if I could have 32GB of RAM. The Mac Mini goes up to 64..
The white bezel will remain? No thanks.We are not expecting any external design changes to the 24-inch iMac, with rumors indicating it will use the same 24-inch display and the same bright color options.
Because Laptops will outsell desktops by a large amount - especially the MacBook Air.Why?
A lot of people supplement a Mac laptop with some kind of Mac desktop at home. It's irrelevant that laptops are used predominately out there as far as %. That also really shouldn't be a big factor when it's appropriate to update hardware, that should go by tech availability of AS SoC's and overall cost of manufactured product.Because Laptops will outsell desktops by a large amount - especially the MacBook Air.
I bet for every person who has a laptop and desktop there will be many more who only have one or the other. From a buisiness point of view, it makes more finincial sense to spend more money developing machines that are going to sell more. I just don't think the iMac, Studio and Pro sell in large enough numbers to justify a yearly update. I'm guessing the M1 MBA is still a massive seller so I think people will buy older hardware if it fulfills their needs. Propper Pros will buy what they need when they need it to support their business/income.A lot of people supplement a Mac laptop with some kind of Mac desktop at home. It's irrelevant that laptops are used predominately out there as far as %. That also really shouldn't be a big factor when it's appropriate to update hardware, that should go by tech availability of AS SoC's and overall cost of manufactured product.
The consumer then decides what he needs at the moment, not reduced to few comparable choices of older technology because of a 2 year cycle compared to 1 year cycle IMHO.
For me the reason I have both it's an important fall back in case one Mac fails for some reason. It also allows me to do a DFU restore for example. Just got a laptop only and the system gets weird, you go to the Apple Store instead.
The only thing to add to this mutual view, is 2 facts, first is the Mac Pro is terribly old (2019), and the 24" iMac (2021) is 2 years already. Second a lot of people are buying Mac because they are now using iPhones. So I don't disagree a M3 would be nicer then a M2, its just like everyone else have no idea if we see it this year definitively. I hope that the general emphasis its getting something much better for both solutions.I bet for every person who has a laptop and desktop there will be many more who only have one or the other. From a buisiness point of view, it makes more finincial sense to spend more money developing machines that are going to sell more. I just don't think the iMac, Studio and Pro sell in large enough numbers to justify a yearly update. I'm guessing the M1 MBA is still a massive seller so I think people will buy older hardware if it fulfills their needs. Propper Pros will buy what they need when they need it to support their business/income.
Because Laptops will outsell desktops by a large amount - especially the MacBook Air.
I think once the M3 lineup is released we will have a much clear idea of Apple's M chip strategy in terms of timings and product updates. At the moment we have one data point (transition from M1 to M2) which occurred across a pandemic (at least for the M2 design) and supply line crisis.The only thing to add to this mutual view, is 2 facts, first is the Mac Pro is terribly old (2019), and the 24" iMac (2021) is 2 years already. Second a lot of people are buying Mac because they are now using iPhones. So I don't disagree a M3 would be nicer then a M2, its just like everyone else have no idea if we see it this year definitively. I hope that the general emphasis its getting something much better for both solutions.![]()
Do you think M3 will be a huge leap from M2 or it will be the same as M2 was from M1?As I've posted previously I think the M2 disappointed Apple and there are suggestions they reduced their M2 requirement.
Looking forward to M3 though.
An easy way to do that is to go with the design of my LG OLED TV. The electronics are a thick enclosure at the bottom on the back. The actual display is about ¼" thick. If Apple went that route there would be no chin and plenty of room for whatever ports desired. The 24" iMac would only be 12" high.get rid of the chin, please...
Ah, I think you may have misunderstood something about that article. It actually said that all Mac sales are down, not just laptops. Yes, there was more focus in the article about laptops, but that's because Mac laptop sales are 74% of all Mac sales, with desktops only 26% (in the September 2022 quarter). MacBook Pros were 40%, and MacBook Airs 34%, each being more than all desktop sales alone. So I don't think this "frees up" chip production for desktops, as it's the lack of desktop demand that drives that.
Agreed. I would have jumped if there was an option for more RAM & additional ports.There was a lot of YouTube video content editors that used the larger 23.5" screen to make multiple video sourced content that ran out of memory about 1/2 hour into content editing, hence the need for a 32 GB RAM 24" iMac. The M2 Pro would provide that. 16 GB Ram is just too little for that type of usage. M2 offering 24 GB Ram is marginal. This was found out back in the days people bought these for content creation when they first came out almost 2 years ago.
The pandemic upset the well laid plans of countless people and businesses worldwide. Why would Apple be any different?So much for Apple Silicon = regular Mac updates....