I say, if you want a Hack, build it yourself. If you buy from Psytar, in all likelihood, you're going to end up supporting that system by yourself anyway. Might as well start from scratch so you know a bit more about your own machine.
I think the general consensus is not that its ilegal...
It's more that you can have some problems later. I haven't went too much into this anyway and I never bought from them but they seem to having some negative publicity going on, poor bastards probably won't survive long![]()
![]()
![]()
Buying from them is very likely not illegal. Using MacOS X on their computers most likely is. At least Apple is convinced that it is, and they will likely ask Psystar for a list of their customers when this is over![]()
It's legal for you to buy and it's legal for them to sell, but why the heck would you do that. Just go get a EFI-X.
Where does that come from? It seems to me that Apple is actually eager to put them into jail for DMCA violation, and to extract as much money as possible from any backers that Psystar might have.Oh? Is that why was Apple so eager to settle out of court earlier?
EULAs with reasonable terms have always been upheld in court, and I can't see anything unreasonable in Apple's EULA.Because EULA's are weak, that's why.
Actually, Judge Alsup has already said that he finds Apple's license, including the limitation to Apple computers, quite reasonable.They're highly vulnerable to any reasonable interpretation of copyright law.
Says who? Why is it called End User License Agreement then?Licensing agreements (which is the lone leg EULAs stand on) apply only between a copyright holder, and someone they are licensing to make for distribution. Which is to say, it applies between an author and a publisher, not between a publisher and a retailer (or an end-user).
Strictly speaking, what Psystar is doing is buying boxed copies from Apple, installing them in violation of the license terms, which automatically terminates the license, and circumventing Apple's copy protection, which makes it a DMCA violation.Strictly speaking, what Psystar is doing is buying boxed copies from Apple, and then reselling them. That's covered under the first sale doctrine, and is an absolutely protected legal right.
Nothing unclear about those parts of the DMCA that make it illegal to circumvent copy protection measures to gain access to a copyrighted works.Apple may win, but it will almost certainly be on DMCA grounds, based on Psystar's defeating Apple's "copy protection mechanisms" (quotes because this is a nebulous gray area because the DMCA is very poorly written) to allow installation on non-Apple hardware.
Those customers would be using MacOS X without a license. And Apple's goal is to stomp out Psystar and stop anyone else from trying a stunt like this. So what would you do if you got a letter from Apple's lawyers? Tough it out?The customers are however, entirely in the clear from any criminal standpoint. Apple could theoretically choose to pursue them in civil court for damages, but I strongly doubt it. It could easily turn into a PR disaster.