Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The question wasn't why it matters, or how much it might matter, but simply if it's a decrease or not. Continued avoidance and deflection of the simple question speaks louder than an actual answer would. That certainly puts it to rest indeed.

It's irrelevant to this discussion. The judge threw out the testimony. The question is indeed why does it matter? It doesn't. If an exhibit is introduced, expect the relevancy of the exhibit to be questioned. Additionally it's not even proven to be factual.
 
It's irrelevant to this discussion. The judge threw out the testimony. The question is indeed why does it matter? It doesn't. If an exhibit is introduced, expect the relevancy of the exhibit to be questioned. Additionally it's not even proven to be factual.

Cool. :cool:
 
It's irrelevant to this discussion. The judge threw out the testimony. The question is indeed why does it matter? It doesn't. If an exhibit is introduced, expect the relevancy of the exhibit to be questioned. Additionally it's not even proven to be factual.

bs_meter_1.gif
 
The amount of energy necessary to refute b*****it is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.

The video speaks for itself. :cool:
 
[MOD NOTE]
I think this topic has been beaten to death and no good will come of it, if it were to remain open.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.