now that little 13" bro has turned out to be a failure, is the 16" the last bastion of hope to achieve the glory of the 2015 MBPs?
...make it usable with external screens is all id need
If glory means slower processors, darker smaller screen with smaller color gamut, slower ports, and worse speakers, then no. It's much less glorious in all those ways.
Also PWM on the display panel and kernel panics.If glory means slower processors, darker smaller screen with smaller color gamut, slower ports, and worse speakers, then no. It's much less glorious in all those ways.
So in 5 years, Apple managed to make a laptop that has a faster processor, better display, faster ports, and better speakers, most of which they didn't invent themselves? Amazing. No one else can do that.If glory means slower processors, darker smaller screen with smaller color gamut, slower ports, and worse speakers, then no. It's much less glorious in all those ways.
I believe that the 16" was simply a stopgap, born out of the Butterfly Keyboard debacle. Due to the high rate of failure with the 15" hence Apple introduced the 16" into the Mac line up to mitigate the situation.
Apple will likely want to be focusing the bulk of it's resources allocated to the Mac for the next generation, hence the barebones updates to the 13" MBP. A Switch to ARM looks to be likely, nor does Apple have any qualms regarding such dramatic moves.
Some will likely drop platform due to such a transition, equally Apple likely has far more to gain as it's target audience will benefit from tighter integration with IOS and likely don't care what silicon drives the system as long as it does what they want.
Q-6
And kernel panics, and its heat/fan issues when using an external monitor.I mean 16" is a hell of a machine besides it's ghosting on the panels.
Some will leave the platform due to the unknown and not wanting to live through it, some will leave simply because they need an intel CPU. In many respects, I count myself in that camp, though I have already left the Mac camp.Some will likely drop platform due to such a transition,
Yes, but at this point you're buying a 5 year old computer. While I don't disagree with you in the details of how the 2015 model is better design wise, in actual usage its hard to recommend such an older computer.Oh, you can get a 2015 for 1/3 the price of the 16".
It's not such a hard sell if you think about the "price to remaining usable life" ratio instead of how old the machine is.Yes, but at this point you're buying a 5 year old computer. While I don't disagree with you in the details of how the 2015 model is better design wise, in actual usage its hard to recommend such an older computer.
If they update the 16" with the following, then it'll achieve the glory of the 2015:
- AMD APUs
- Nvidia GPUs
- Remove touchbar
- Downsize the touchpad
- Add one USBA, one HDMI port, and SD card slot
- Drop starting price by $400
If they update the 16" with the following, then it'll achieve the glory of the 2015:
- AMD APUs
- Nvidia GPUs
- Remove touchbar
- Downsize the touchpad
- Add one USBA, one HDMI port, and SD card slot
- Drop starting price by $400
Touchbar is a solution in search of a problem. They replaced something that is very useful for many users, with a component that looks great on display in the store but ergonomically is much more inferior to actual keys or a touchscreenits kinda useful for some stuff
If they update the 16" with the following, then it'll achieve the glory of the 2015:
- AMD APUs
- Nvidia GPUs
- Remove touchbar
- Downsize the touchpad
- Add one USBA, one HDMI port, and SD card slot
- Drop starting price by $400
People will never stop confusing their personal preferences with objective facts. Most people vastly prefer the 16" to the 2015, but that's a matter of personal preference. Most prefer more speed, more power, larger brighter screen, better color, better speakers and a larger trackpad to function keys, old slower ports and a small trackpad for those who type oddly. To each their own.
Just responding to some of the comments above, which disagree that 16" delivered.that's not at all what this thread is about.
only the touchbar is objectively worse because, as stated above, its a solution to a non-existent problem, and causes more problems thats its purported to solve.
i find it pretty crazy that sometimes i fantasize about using Fn keys with this new (old) keyboard. if only...if only.Your comment earned a few points in my book by keeping it honest about the TouchBar
now that little 13" bro has turned out to be a failure, is the 16" the last bastion of hope to achieve the glory of the 2015 MBPs?