i have it, love it. but its a toy. IMHO anyone who says its not a toy is just trying to justify it to themselves. Except in some rare cases ( i know a few architects that say its amazing for their work, most people aren't using it for work; etc. Editing docs, excel sheets; etc is a hassle on the ipad. Id rather be on my mbp anyday, and if i needed real portability id get a mba.
the ipad is just an extra toy. Now there is nothing wrong with that. It def. a gr8 toy. i wouldn't go without one.
Wheres the option for not with backlight bleeding!
i have it, love it. but its a toy. IMHO anyone who says its not a toy is just trying to justify it to themselves. Except in some rare cases ( i know a few architects that say its amazing for their work, most people aren't using it for work; etc. Editing docs, excel sheets; etc is a hassle on the ipad. Id rather be on my mbp anyday, and if i needed real portability id get a mba.
the ipad is just an extra toy. Now there is nothing wrong with that. It def. a gr8 toy. i wouldn't go without one.
I still dont get the need to label it a toy I agree, generally and strictly speaking, its an unneeded, luxury item most of our homes are full of such items I just dont buy into the whole use it for work=tool; use it for non-work=toy dichotomy many things can be used as toys high end PC for example however, most toys can never be used as anything but toys I see nothing inherently toy-like in the iPad simply being less then something else does not make it a toy
I voted "Yes I need it," but actually that's a bit too strong. On the other hand, I don't think of it as a toy, either. It's an extremely useful gadget that has both practical and entertainment uses.
With your logic, why do you own anything? A tv is a toy - you don't need one. In fact, a kitchen table is a toy - you could eat standing up or by setting your plate on your knees. But then, your entire house is a toy - you could probably get by with a tent and a heater.
If the iPad serves it's purpose, there you go. Who cares if it's a toy or not?
In a nutshell, I think iPads (and tablets in general) are fascinating toys with a LOT of potential.
I know I've ranted about this before but people who claim it's a toy because it can't do WORK are missing the point. For the VAST majority of the consumer market they don't need it to open excel or edit a word document. They edit photos, make movies, use the web, connect and share information on blogs, social networks and the like... all of those functions elavate it FAR above this derisory 'toy' designation that geeks throw around and make it a fully-fledged computer to those users.
Want a work computer? Buy a laptop or desktop. That's what they're designed for, that's what they're good for, that's what all the software is built around and that's where the toolset is based. But to consider an iPad (or any tablet actually) a 'toy' because it's based around the needs of its target market (a market, btw, that has the potential to be considerably larger than the business world) is just nonsense.